Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 May 2013, 12:06
Customize  |  Hide

Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
VP
VP
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1255
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for [#permalink] New post 11 Dec 2004, 19:06
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for our chemical division, which has traditionally contributed about 60 percent of the corporation's profits. It is therefore encouraging that there is the following evidence that the pharmaceutical division is growing stronger. It Contributed 45 percent of the corporation's profits, up from 20 percent the previous year.

On the basisc of the facts stated, which of the following is the best critique of the evidence presented above?

(A) The increase in the pharmaceutical division's contribution to corporation profits could have resulted largely from the introduction of a single, important new product.

(B)In multidivisional corporations that have pharmaceutical divisions, over half of the corporation's profits usually comes from pharmaceuticals

(C)The percentage of the corporation's profits attributable to the pharmaceutical division could have increased even if that division's performance had not improved.

(D) The information cited does not make it possible to determine whether the 20 percent share of profits cited was itself an improvement over the year before.

(E)The information cited does not make it possible to compare the performance of the chemical and pharmaceutical divisions in terms of the percent of total profits attributable to each
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Dec 2004
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Dec 2004, 21:12
C is the correct answer.

Since contribution to profit by chemical division is down, that would increase the contribution to profit by other divisons.This can happen without even other divisions growing stronger.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Oct 2004
Posts: 102
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Dec 2004, 23:00
It's C.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 495
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 14 Dec 2004, 01:18
i'll pick B ;
  [#permalink] 14 Dec 2004, 01:18
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Popular new posts Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for nocilis 11 16 Feb 2005, 20:32
New posts Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for nakib77 7 27 Oct 2005, 14:17
New posts Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for prude_sb 4 25 Apr 2006, 19:39
Popular new posts 5 Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for noboru 27 23 Aug 2009, 11:13
Popular new posts 10 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for feruz77 10 01 Nov 2010, 08:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.