|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1304
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
59
[0], given: 0
|
Current farm policy is institutionalized penalization of [#permalink]
28 Feb 2009, 00:06
Question Stats:
59% (02:05) correct
40% (00:57) wrong based on 179 sessions
Current farm policy is institutionalized penalization of consumers. It increases food prices for middle- and low-income families and costs the taxpayer billions of dollars a year. Which of the following statements, if true, would provide support for the author’s claims above? I. Farm subsidies amount to roughly $20 billion a year in federal payouts and $12 billion more in higher food prices. II. According to a study by the Department of Agriculture, each $1 of benefits provided to farmers for ethanol production costs consumers and taxpayers $4. III. The average full-time farmers have an average net worth of over $300,000. (A) I only (B) II only (C) III only (D) I and II only (E) I, II, and III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Posts: 501
Schools: Kellogg, MIT, Michigan, Berkeley, Marshall, Mellon
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
20
[0], given: 13
|
Re: CR: Farm policy [#permalink]
28 Feb 2009, 09:28
ritula wrote: Current farm policy is institutionalized penalization of consumers. It increases food prices for middle- and low-income families and costs the taxpayer billions of dollars a year. Which of the following statements, if true, would provide support for the author’s claims above? I. Farm subsidies amount to roughly $20 billion a year in federal payouts and $12 billion more in higher food prices. II. According to a study by the Department of Agriculture, each $1 of benefits provided to farmers for ethanol production costs consumers and taxpayers $4. III. The average full-time farmers have an average net worth of over $300,000. (A) I only (B) II only (C) III only (D) I and II only (E) I, II, and III Hi mates, IMO AI've chosen A thanks to eliminating others. II out because it talks about ethanol production costs and the question is wider. III out because it talks about just full-time farmers and alse because the net worth doesn't add any special thing and because "None" is not among answers, I must be correct OA and Source? Cheers
_________________
mates, please visit my profile and leave comments johnlewis1980-s-profile-feedback-is-more-than-welcome-80538.html
I'm not linked to GMAT questions anymore, so, if you need something, please PM me
I'm already focused on my application package 
My experience in my second attempt http://gmatclub.com/forum/p544312#p544312 My experience in my third attempt 630-q-47-v-28-engineer-non-native-speaker-my-experience-78215.html#p588275
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Posts: 112
Followers: 8
Kudos [?]:
106
[1] , given: 0
|
Re: CR: Farm policy [#permalink]
28 Feb 2009, 11:35
1
This post received KUDOS
Current farm policy is institutionalized penalization of consumers. It increases food prices for middle- and low-income families and costs the taxpayer billions of dollars a year. Which of the following statements, if true, would provide support for the author’s claims above? Explanation: ---------------------- I. Farm subsidies amount to roughly $20 billion a year in federal payouts and $12 billion more in higher food prices. ---> Correct. This option just looks like a restatement of the premise (the only difference is that they have added numbers instead of words). II. According to a study by the Department of Agriculture, each $1 of benefits provided to farmers for ethanol production costs consumers and taxpayers $4. ---> Clearly provides support for author's claim. Benefit ($1) provided to the farmers is not going to come from money plant; it will come from the taxpayers. Also, increase in production cost will be reflected in increased food prices, which will affect consumers. III. The average full-time farmers have an average net worth of over $300,000. ---> Irrelevant. How does it show that the farm policy is penalizing consumers and taxpayers? (A) I only (B) II only (C) III only (D) I and II only (E) I, II, and III ---------------------- Clearly, option D. Hope that helps. Regards, Technext
_________________
+++ Believe me, it doesn't take much of an effort to underline SC questions. Just try it out. +++ +++ Please tell me why other options are wrong. +++
~~~ The only way to get smarter is to play a smarter opponent. ~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 923
Followers: 27
Kudos [?]:
93
[0], given: 14
|
Re: CR: Farm policy [#permalink]
28 Feb 2009, 12:18
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1592
Followers: 7
Kudos [?]:
132
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR: Farm policy [#permalink]
28 Feb 2009, 17:39
Very confusing question. Initially, I thought options I and II are correct. But, I will go only with I because, II does not support the fact that each year, the policy costs billions of dollars to tax payers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1304
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
59
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR: Farm policy [#permalink]
28 Feb 2009, 23:29
OA is D. thanks Technext for the explanation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Posts: 288
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
25
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR: Farm policy [#permalink]
01 Mar 2009, 12:24
ritula wrote: OA is D. thanks Technext for the explanation What's the source of this question? consider the second given statement : According to a study by the Department of Agriculture, each $1 of benefits provided to farmers for ethanol production costs consumers and taxpayers $4. How would one deduce a multiple of billion for the costs? this statement only talks about the proportions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 29 Dec 2009
Posts: 42
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
Schools: Duke (Fuqua) - Class of 2014
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
GPA: 3.5
WE: General Management (Real Estate)
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 1
|
Re: CR: Farm policy [#permalink]
02 Feb 2010, 06:55
Quote: What's the source of this question? consider the second given statement : According to a study by the Department of Agriculture, each $1 of benefits provided to farmers for ethanol production costs consumers and taxpayers $4. How would one deduce a multiple of billion for the costs? this statement only talks about the proportions. ritula wrote: OA is D. thanks Technext for the explanation What's the source of this question? consider the second given statement : According to a study by the Department of Agriculture, each $1 of benefits provided to farmers for ethanol production costs consumers and taxpayers $4. How would one deduce a multiple of billion for the costs? this statement only talks about the proportions. I second that....the logic behind II being a supporting statement is not convincing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2009
Posts: 109
Location: United States
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
21
[0], given: 5
|
Re: CR: Farm policy [#permalink]
02 Feb 2010, 07:30
Without using outside knowledge that ethanol costs drive up food costs, I don't see how II increases food costs for low/middle income people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 154
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 1
|
Re: CR: Farm policy [#permalink]
02 Feb 2010, 12:31
I agree I and II so answer D is correct
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 180
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
49
[1] , given: 5
|
Re: CR: Farm policy [#permalink]
02 Feb 2010, 22:26
1
This post received KUDOS
Current farm policy is institutionalized penalization of consumers. It increases food prices for middle- and low-income families and costs the taxpayer billions of dollars a year. Which of the following statements, if true, would provide support for the author’s claims above?
I. Farm subsidies amount to roughly $20 billion a year in federal payouts and $12 billion more in higher food prices. affects consumer since food prices increases due to farm subsidies II. According to a study by the Department of Agriculture, each $1 of benefits provided to farmers for ethanol production costs consumers and taxpayers $4. benefits given to farmers affects taxpayers III. The average full-time farmers have an average net worth of over $300,000. networth of farmers doesn't affect tax payers and consumers so irrelavant
only option I and II support authors claim
so my choice is D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 154
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 1
|
Re: CR: Farm policy [#permalink]
02 Feb 2010, 23:50
Wow! that's a confusing one! Thanks for posting!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 12 Jul 2009
Posts: 13
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 2
|
Re: CR: Farm policy [#permalink]
11 Feb 2010, 10:26
Clearly D as III is completely irrelevant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 10 Feb 2010
Posts: 197
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
23
[0], given: 6
|
Re: CR: Farm policy [#permalink]
11 Feb 2010, 14:00
D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 14 Sep 2010
Posts: 7
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 6
|
Re: CR: Farm policy [#permalink]
07 Feb 2011, 08:52
silasaaa2 wrote: Current farm policy is institutionalized penalization of consumers. It increases food prices for middle- and low-income families and costs the taxpayer billions of dollars a year. Which of the following statements, if true, would provide support for the author’s claims above?
I. Farm subsidies amount to roughly $20 billion a year in federal payouts and $12 billion more in higher food prices. affects consumer since food prices increases due to farm subsidies II. According to a study by the Department of Agriculture, each $1 of benefits provided to farmers for ethanol production costs consumers and taxpayers $4. benefits given to farmers affects taxpayers III. The average full-time farmers have an average net worth of over $300,000. networth of farmers doesn't affect tax payers and consumers so irrelavant
only option I and II support authors claim
so my choice is D hw would farm subsidies increase food prices and tat too for middle- and low-income families and costs the taxpayer billions of dollars a year. It might cost taxpayers billions of dollars. bt fud price increase - i couldnt gt tat. plz explain?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 27 Oct 2010
Posts: 190
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
6
[0], given: 20
|
Re: CR: Farm policy [#permalink]
07 Feb 2011, 10:22
Easy D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2010
Posts: 431
WE 1: Business Development
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
25
[0], given: 161
|
Re: CR: Farm policy [#permalink]
07 Feb 2011, 10:50
Thanks guys, but i still agree with sanjay_gmat. how can u know it will cost millions? thanks.
_________________
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Status: GMAT Learner
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 664
Followers: 21
Kudos [?]:
109
[0], given: 31
|
Re: CR: Farm policy [#permalink]
07 Feb 2011, 13:14
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 16 Mar 2010
Posts: 42
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 39
|
Re: CR: Farm policy [#permalink]
07 Feb 2011, 14:18
can you please post the source of this question? i don't see anything in statement 2 that supports costing the taxpayer billions of dollars per year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2010
Posts: 431
WE 1: Business Development
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
25
[0], given: 161
|
Re: CR: Farm policy [#permalink]
07 Feb 2011, 14:22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: CR: Farm policy
[#permalink]
07 Feb 2011, 14:22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Vercules, Legendaddy, noboru, Marcab, metallicafan, rajeevrks27, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, souvik101990, doe007, MacFauz, PTK, carcass, kissthegmat, Narenn
|