Last visit was: 21 May 2025, 10:25 It is currently 21 May 2025, 10:25
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
ritula
Joined: 18 May 2008
Last visit: 12 Apr 2011
Posts: 695
Own Kudos:
3,040
 [67]
Posts: 695
Kudos: 3,040
 [67]
15
Kudos
Add Kudos
51
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Technext
Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Last visit: 14 Oct 2022
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
375
 [14]
Concentration: International Business
Posts: 66
Kudos: 375
 [14]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
boeinz
Joined: 26 Jul 2009
Last visit: 27 Jan 2012
Posts: 228
Own Kudos:
1,266
 [4]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 228
Kudos: 1,266
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
silasaaa2
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Last visit: 29 Apr 2012
Posts: 53
Own Kudos:
74
 [2]
Given Kudos: 5
 Q45  V27 GMAT 2: 640  Q47  V31
GPA: 3.32
Posts: 53
Kudos: 74
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Current farm policy is institutionalized penalization of consumers. It increases food prices for middle- and low-income families and costs the taxpayer billions of dollars a year.
Which of the following statements, if true, would provide support for the author’s claims above?


I. Farm subsidies amount to roughly $20 billion a year in federal payouts and $12 billion more in higher food prices. affects consumer since food prices increases due to farm subsidies
II. According to a study by the Department of Agriculture, each $1 of benefits provided to farmers for ethanol production costs consumers and taxpayers $4.
benefits given to farmers affects taxpayers
III. The average full-time farmers have an average net worth of over $300,000. networth of farmers doesn't affect tax payers and consumers so irrelavant

only option I and II support authors claim

so my choice is D
User avatar
almostfamous
Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Last visit: 21 Mar 2011
Posts: 195
Own Kudos:
122
 [2]
Given Kudos: 8
Concentration: Strategy Consulting
Schools:HEC Paris, , Tepper
Posts: 195
Kudos: 122
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Clearly, D is the right answer.

Some people have asked why II results in "millions of dollars".

On the GMAT CR, it helps if you really focus on the main scheme or idea.

This question is actually simple, because the central theme of the question stem (i.e. central assumption of the question stem) is just one:

"Government policy of financial aids to the farmers hurts the consumers financially."

So, if "for each dollar the farmers receive, the consumers need to pay 4 dollars", it is REASONABLE to infer that these 4 dollars accumulate into millions of the taxes these consumers need to pay to assist the farmers.

The reasonability of inference depends on the context. It's similar in everyday conversations. Let's assume that we are talking about the VAT in say, France (VAT = 15%). Then, if I say that "for every euro I spend, the government gets 15 cents.", it is totally reasonable to infer that the French government gets not only my 15 cents but also millions (if not billions) Euro from VAT, others pay.

Hope this helps to clarify the question some of you had.
avatar
ForzaJuve
Joined: 25 Nov 2012
Last visit: 20 May 2014
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
8
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.29
WE:Corporate Finance (Consulting)
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
Posts: 6
Kudos: 8
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My attempt at explaining D:

- Identify the type of question: Strengthen
- Most, if not all Strengthen questions require the test taker to strengthen the Conclusion
- Identify the Conclusion: "Current farm policy is institutionalized penalization of consumers."
- Therefore, any answer choice that lends support to this conclusion is a Strengthener

I. This is the easiest answer choice - clearly consumers are penalized by higher food prices. This answer provides cold, hard numbers (i.e., $12 bn). YES

II. This is the trickiest answer choice - the test maker tries to throw you off by shifting your focus away from the conclusion and onto the premise. This is why for CR questions, identifying and separating the conclusion and premise (in addition to subsidiary conclusion and counter-premise) is so important. The trick is to not fall into the trap of trying to strengthen the premise (i.e., the second sentence of the stimulus). At the end of the day, you are trying to prove the conclusion that [general] farm policy hurts consumers. Regardless of whether this answer choice pertains to food prices, this answer choice gives readers more reason to believe the conclusion. YES

III. Also pretty easy to get rid of this answer - a farmer's net worth has nothing to do with whether farm policy penalizes consumers. The focus of the conclusion is on consumers, not farmers. NO
avatar
OptimusPrepJanielle
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Last visit: 08 Sep 2017
Posts: 1,781
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 23
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,781
Kudos: 1,434
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Current farm policy is institutionalized penalization of consumers. It increases food prices for middle- and low-income families and costs the taxpayer billions of dollars a year.

Which of the following statements, if true, would provide support for the author’s claims above?
*Current farm policy increases food costs for middle and low income families and penalizes taxpayers.
I. Farm subsidies amount to roughly $20 billion a year in federal payouts and $12 billion more in higher food prices. *Supports food increase claim
II. According to a study by the Department of Agriculture, each $1 of benefits provided to farmers for ethanol production costs consumers and taxpayers $4.*Supports penalization of taxpayers (Ethanol production costs consumers and taxpayers)
III. The average full-time farmers have an average net worth of over $300,000. *Their net worth doesn't affect consumers or taxpayers.

(A) I only
(B) II only
(C) III only
(D) I and II only
(E) I, II, and III
User avatar
mvictor
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Last visit: 14 Jul 2021
Posts: 2,129
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 236
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE:General Management (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
Posts: 2,129
Kudos: 1,240
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I highly doubt that this is a valid gmat CR question.
Moreover, it is very ambiguous, as the fact that something can lead to smth else does not mean that it really is. What if the farmers are not given anything to process their crops into ethanol?
What if by processing the ethanol, the price per gallon of gas decreases by 5$? This clearly does not affect much the taxpayers who have cars.
avatar
nandeta
Joined: 16 Jan 2020
Last visit: 02 Apr 2020
Posts: 52
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Posts: 52
Kudos: 82
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion: Farm policy = Penalized for consumer
Argument : Inc. Food prices for families & costs taxpayer billions of dollars
Strengthen: To provide the statistics for the above argument.



I. Farm subsidies amount to roughly $20 billion a year in federal payouts and $12 billion more in higher food prices.
II. According to a study by the Department of Agriculture, each $1 of benefits provided to farmers for ethanol production costs consumers and taxpayers $4.

III. The average full-time farmers have an average net worth of over $300,000.

(A) I only
(B) II only
(C) III only
(D) I and II only
(E) I, II, and III
User avatar
Qazi700
Joined: 13 Jan 2022
Last visit: 10 Jan 2024
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 21
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Technext
Current farm policy is institutionalized penalization of consumers. It increases food prices for middle- and low-income families and costs the taxpayer billions of dollars a year.

Which of the following statements, if true, would provide support for the author’s claims above?

Explanation:
----------------------
I. Farm subsidies amount to roughly $20 billion a year in federal payouts and $12 billion more in higher food prices. ---> Correct. This option just looks like a restatement of the premise (the only difference is that they have added numbers instead of words).

II. According to a study by the Department of Agriculture, each $1 of benefits provided to farmers for ethanol production costs consumers and taxpayers $4. ---> Clearly provides support for author's claim. Benefit ($1) provided to the farmers is not going to come from money plant; it will come from the taxpayers. Also, increase in production cost will be reflected in increased food prices, which will affect consumers.

III. The average full-time farmers have an average net worth of over $300,000. ---> Irrelevant. How does it show that the farm policy is penalizing consumers and taxpayers?

(A) I only
(B) II only
(C) III only
(D) I and II only
(E) I, II, and III
----------------------

Clearly, option D.

Hope that helps.


Regards,
Technext

I do not understand the underlying assumption here. It is not explicit in the first option that the subsidies are being financed by tax. Government can also use sovereign bonds to finance the capital. All I want to bring out is that the whole point of CR is to judge on the basis of provided information and to forget the previous knowledge of subject. Hence, I don't think first option stands. Please correct me.
User avatar
Vannybhardwaj
Joined: 12 Mar 2025
Last visit: 11 May 2025
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
but still in the in the second statement if there was no ethanol subside
User avatar
Agarwal2003
Joined: 21 Jan 2025
Last visit: 20 May 2025
Posts: 54
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 186
Posts: 54
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
please explain the meaning of statement 1
ritula
Current farm policy is institutionalized penalization of consumers. It increases food prices for middle- and low-income families and costs the taxpayer billions of dollars a year.

Which of the following statements, if true, would provide support for the author’s claims above?

I. Farm subsidies amount to roughly $20 billion a year in federal payouts and $12 billion more in higher food prices.
II. According to a study by the Department of Agriculture, each $1 of benefits provided to farmers for ethanol production costs consumers and taxpayers $4.
III. The average full-time farmers have an average net worth of over $300,000.

(A) I only
(B) II only
(C) III only
(D) I and II only
(E) I, II, and III
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7307 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
233 posts