Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: Inequality Help! [#permalink]
21 Jun 2011, 11:32

1

This post received KUDOS

I cannot think of scenario where statement A is not alone sufficient. Statement A should alone give the value of exp as either +ve or -ve. So should be sufficient.

As per state statement 2, the value of the expression can be either 0 or -ve or +ve, so it is not sufficient.

i remember this Q i read somewhere and it was required to determine - x(y+z) >=0 , in that case the both statements will be required and OA should be C.

Last edited by agdimple333 on 21 Jun 2011, 11:45, edited 1 time in total.

Re: Inequality Help! [#permalink]
21 Jun 2011, 11:08

Hmm I don't get the OA..

If xyz is not equal to zero it means neither value, x, y or z can be zero.

1) If we pick values for y and z, -2 and 0,5, then we get 1,5 = 2,5 which obviously doesn't fit. If we take -2 and -0,5 we get 2,5 = 2,5 which fits. In order to fit this y and z must therefore have the same sign. Therefore it can either be negative or positive. Still, whether x(y+z)=0, now depends on the value of x. We can see from the question that if xyz is not equal to zero it means x is also not zero. So, if x can't equal zero, x(y+z), no matter the value of y+z, can not equal zero. Why is it C then, anyone?

Re: Inequality Help! [#permalink]
27 Jun 2011, 10:10

agdimple333 wrote:

I cannot think of scenario where statement A is not alone sufficient. Statement A should alone give the value of exp as either +ve or -ve. So should be sufficient.

As per state statement 2, the value of the expression can be either 0 or -ve or +ve, so it is not sufficient.

i remember this Q i read somewhere and it was required to determine - x(y+z) >=0 , in that case the both statements will be required and OA should be C.

I agree with this. Anyone thinks otherwise? Please give me an example where A alone fails.

\(If \hspace{2} xyz \ne 0, \hspace{1} is \hspace{3} x(y+z)=0?\)

\(1) \hspace{4} |y+z| = |y|+|z|\)

\(2) \hspace{4} |x+y| = |x|+|y|\)

Given : xyz not equal to 0 therefore x not equal to 0 , y not equal to 0 and z not equal to 0.

from condition 1 : |y+z| = |y|+|z| therefore both y and z are either positive or negative but not zero(this is given), therefore (y+z) will never be zero. This condtion is not sufficient beacuse if x=0 then x(y+z) becomes '0' else x(y+z) is non zero.

from condition 2 : |x+y| = |x| + |y| therefore x and y are either positive or negative but not zero(this is given) , therefore neither x =0 nor y = 0 . This condtion is not sufficient because what if z= -y then x(y+z) = 0.

From condition 1 and 2 neither x=0 nor y=-z (because they both are either positive or negative). Hence we can say that x(y+z) will never be zero.

Social entrepreneurs aren't running charities : ‘It’s easy to think about it in terms of charity: it’s not. They are sustainable, trading, revenue-generating businesses. The benefit of them...