Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 08:11 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 08:11

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92942
Own Kudos [?]: 619181 [3]
Given Kudos: 81609
Send PM
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 4128
Own Kudos [?]: 9247 [1]
Given Kudos: 91
 Q51  V47
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 20 Oct 2019
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Posts: 368
Own Kudos [?]: 707 [0]
Given Kudos: 67
Location: Switzerland
Concentration: General Management
GPA: 3.9
Send PM
Re: Dr. Ruiz: Dr. Smith has expressed outspoken antismoking views in publi [#permalink]
Dr. Ruiz: Dr. Smith has expressed outspoken antismoking views in public. Even though Dr. Smith is otherwise qualified, clearly she cannot be included on a panel that examines the danger of secondhand cigarette smoke. As an organizer of the panel, I want to ensure that the panel examines the issue in an unbiased manner before coming to any conclusion.

Which one of the following, if true, provides the strongest basis for countering Dr. Ruiz’ argument that Dr. Smith should not be included on the panel?



Weaken question

Pre-thinking

What if in order to arrive to an unbiased opinion one can express their view in public?

An assumption made by Dr. Ruiz is that if someone express their opinion in public, it won't be possible to arrive to an unbiased opinion.


POE:

(A) A panel composed of qualified people with strong but conflicting views on a particular topic is more likely to reach an unbiased conclusion than a panel composed of people who have kept their views, if any, private.
In line with our pre-thought [b]falsification scenario[/b]

(B) People who hold strong views on a particular topic tend to accept new evidence on that topic only if it supports their views.
strengthener

(C) A panel that includes one qualified person with publicly known strong views on a particular topic is more likely to have lively discussions than a panel that includes only people with no well-defined views on that topic.
strengthener

(D) People who have expressed strong views in public on a particular topic are better at raising funds to support their case than are people who have never expressed strong views in public.
irrelevant

(E) People who have well-defined strong views on a particular topic prior to joining a panel are often able to impose their views on panel members who are not committed at the outset to any conclusion.
strengthener
Current Student
Joined: 03 Jan 2019
Posts: 22
Own Kudos [?]: 38 [0]
Given Kudos: 134
Location: India
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V33
GPA: 4
Send PM
Re: Dr. Ruiz: Dr. Smith has expressed outspoken antismoking views in publi [#permalink]
Mentalist517 wrote:
I chose option C. Why is C wrong ?
And how is A a better option ?


One needs to not only look at the conclusion but also how the author arrives at that conclusion.
Here, the author wants the panel to examine the situation in an unbiased manner. Does it matter if the discussion is lively?

These are some clever traps GMAT lures you into.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Jun 2019
Posts: 275
Own Kudos [?]: 89 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Send PM
Re: Dr. Ruiz: Dr. Smith has expressed outspoken antismoking views in publi [#permalink]
I read A, but didn't pick it because in reality it isn't true. That's why I picked C because it has basis in reality and, as an assumption, a lively discussion will produce more facts.
But the question specifically says "if true", therefore A is the better answer because it's simpler and directly counters the argument.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17224
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Dr. Ruiz: Dr. Smith has expressed outspoken antismoking views in publi [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Dr. Ruiz: Dr. Smith has expressed outspoken antismoking views in publi [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne