Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

because the figure in question is a cube sides pq,qr,pr are equal. Hence pqr is an equilateral triangle. So you get 60 for each included angle.
Had this been a cuboid, then it is a different story.
_________________

Re: For the cube shown above, what is the degree measure of [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Jun 2012, 06:34

Hi, I understood the answer and I agree, but I can't find out why my logic isn't right.

Since it's a cube, all angles are 90 degrees, and since PO and RO are the bisectrix of the angle 90, than PQR would have to be 90, which is not the answer. What am thinking wrong?

Hi, I understood the answer and I agree, but I can't find out why my logic isn't right.

Since it's a cube, all angles are 90 degrees, and since PO and RO are the bisectrix of the angle 90, than PQR would have to be 90, which is not the answer. What am thinking wrong?

Thanks.

Below solution might help.

For the cube shown above, what is the degree measure of PQR? A. 30 B. 45 C. 60 D. 75 E. 90

Note that triangle PQR is equilateral: it's made by the diagonals of the adjacent faces of the given cube (and as faces of a cube are squares its diagonals are equal). Thus angle BEG=60 degrees.

Re: For the cube shown above, what is the degree measure of PQR [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Oct 2013, 13:54

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Re: For the cube shown above, what is the degree measure of PQR [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 May 2014, 10:38

Hi Bunuel, since the face of a cube forms the square and the diagonal of the square bisects the angles.The 2 diagonals shown in the pictures and each makes an angle of 45.Thus,why not the answer is 45+45=90?Can you please help me to understand this.

Re: For the cube shown above, what is the degree measure of PQR [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 May 2014, 11:22

8

This post received KUDOS

2

This post was BOOKMARKED

ankushbassi wrote:

Hi Bunuel, since the face of a cube forms the square and the diagonal of the square bisects the angles.The 2 diagonals shown in the pictures and each makes an angle of 45.Thus,why not the answer is 45+45=90?Can you please help me to understand this.

Hi Ankush, The angle in question is as shown.Please refer the diagram below:

Attachment:

g2.png [ 17.85 KiB | Viewed 16585 times ]

It would be an equilateral triangle made up by 3 face diagonals.

What you are referring are the two angles in two different planes. which are angle POA and angle AOR each 45 degrees

They are on adjacent faces of the cube,which you cannot combine.

Hi Bunuel, since the face of a cube forms the square and the diagonal of the square bisects the angles.The 2 diagonals shown in the pictures and each makes an angle of 45.Thus,why not the answer is 45+45=90?Can you please help me to understand this.

Because these two squares are not in the same plane. If the square were in the same plane (as shown below), then you would be correct:

Re: For the cube shown above, what is the degree measure of PQR [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Sep 2014, 03:23

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

i am still not able to figure out ..why is it not 90 deg.

keeping in view the above figure..gmatacequant`s fig.

can`t we say. since sides are equal..ap=ar in traingle apo..ap=ao(sides of cube) thus, ap=ao (isos tr) this implies ..angle apo=aop=45 similarly, ang. aor=45 thus, por= 90

i am still not able to figure out ..why is it not 90 deg.

keeping in view the above figure..gmatacequant`s fig.

can`t we say. since sides are equal..ap=ar in traingle apo..ap=ao(sides of cube) thus, ap=ao (isos tr) this implies ..angle apo=aop=45 similarly, ang. aor=45 thus, por= 90

Re: For the cube shown above, what is the degree measure of PQR [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Sep 2015, 12:42

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...