fantaisie wrote:
After solving a fair bit of questions from various sources (
OG, GMAT Club, random questions online) + doing practice tests from Kaplan, Veritas, the Economist & GMAT Club, I developed this theory that due to more and more students scoring high on GMAT nowadays, the creaters have significantly altered the questions, which makes a lot of older material simply too easy for practice.
I scored just ok on many of the tests (not GMAT Club ones though), did many 600-700 exercises regardless of the topic correctly. But when doing
GMAT Club tests and the official free GMAT prep test, I realised that the original questions (and GMAT Club questions) are much harder than the ones I often see online. I have developed a false sense of security that I can solve many questions just to realise that I actually can't.
1. More and more high scores: this is not true, or it is
extremely unlikely to be true. At least where it matters. The average GMAT (total) score has not changed much in the last 10 years or so (only quant percentiles have changed significantly).
2. Old material is too easy: how old?
OG questions are still very representative of what the GMAT tests. You should be fine using them, as long as you keep in mind that the OGs are not meant to provide you with only "700-800 level" questions. The GMAT itself does not have a particular difficulty level (it's an adaptive test). So yes, if you are very good, most
OG questions will be easier than the ones you'll see on the exam.
3. Doing "600-700 level" questions correctly: it's very hard to put questions into such categories, and the GMAT itself does not use them. Use the GMATPrep practice tests to get a better idea of where you are. Do your practice sets/drills under timed conditions.
4. False sense of security: (from the earlier point) don't use practice questions to determine your current ability level. Use the GMATPreps. Even the GMATPreps won't account for exam day pressure though.