ugafan wrote:
reviewed manhatten books for 6 weeks....got the general idea of the exam..
took it this morning....370(Q 18(6%), V 22(27%)
i have 45 days til my exam Monday Jan 30,2012
I must break 500 and goal is 600 flat.
there is to much jibber jabber in manhatten to really go through all of it...i am no braniac.
over the next 45 days i am going to take one manhattan test per week till test day, gmat prep on the saturday before my exam.
New study tactics:
OG12 problems primarily...forget 'studying'...do problems, understand basic concepts.
SC book + NP book, basic formulas get down.---these books seem to be the absolute bibles for a base 500.
i flew through math with 20mins to go....verbal about 10min to go....i felt anxious to finish like i was always going to run out of time. the verbal i felt at ease reading the material...surprisingly found it interesting.because i dont read much.
math section....data sufficiency...is the devil.....really need to understand the GMAT mentality in how they want us to analyze problems.
IS GETTING ABOVE 500 POSSIBLE OR EVEN FLAT 600. PLEASE PROVIDE ANY HELP, SUGGESTIONS, ETC.
I REFUSE TO LET THE GMAT BEAT ME.
THANKS
UGAFAN
Tips for data sufficiency:
Read the question.
Read statement 1. Assume it is true. Evaluate whether the information provided in statement 1 is enough to answer the question. You do not actually have to solve the problem, but you must determine if the information given is sufficient to solve the problem.
If you find that the information in statement 1 is sufficient, you automatically know that the answer will be either A (statement 1 alone is sufficient, but statement 2 alone is not sufficient) or D (each statement alone is sufficient to answer the question).
If you find that the information in statement 1 is not sufficient, you automatically know that the answer will be either B (statement 2 alone is sufficient, but statement 1 alone is not sufficient), C (both statements 1 and 2 together are sufficient to answer the question, but neither statement alone is sufficient), or E (statements 1 and 2 are not sufficient to answer the question asked and additional data is needed to answer the question).
Now, completely ignore statement 1 and only focus on statement 2. Read statement 2. Assume it is true. Note that the GMAT wants you to assume both statements 1 and 2 are true, and thus cannot contradict one another. Evaluate whether the information given in statement 2 is enough to answer the question. (Keep in mind, that once you have reviewed statement 1, you can narrow your choices to know the answer will be either A or D, or that the answer will be either B, C, or E - you can always narrow down to these two groups)
If after reviewing statement 1, you decided the answer was either A or D, read statement 2 and determine whether it is sufficient to answer the question alone. If statement 2 alone is sufficient, you know your answer is D (because you already determined that statement 1 alone is sufficient).
If after reviewing statement 2, you decided the answer was between B, C, or E, read statement 2 and determine whether it is sufficient alone. If so, the answer is B (since you already determined statement 1 alone is not sufficient). If it is not sufficient alone, but you can solve the problem with both statements 1 and 2 together, the answer is C. If neither statement alone is sufficient, the answer is E.
Hope this helps! If it confused you even more, let me know and I'll try to explain further.