Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 May 2013, 14:24
Customize  |  Hide

Historian: Alexander the Great should not be judged by

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 327
Location: MI
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Historian: Alexander the Great should not be judged by [#permalink] New post 17 Dec 2003, 10:44
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Historian: Alexander the Great should not be judged by appeal to current notions of justice. Alexander, an ancient figure of heroic stature, should be judged by the standards of his own culture. That is, did he live up to his culture's ideals of leadership? Did Alexander elevate the contemporary standards of justice? Was he, in his day, judged to be a just and wise ruler?

Student: But you cannot tell whether or not Alexander raised the contemporary standards of justice without invoking standards other than those of his own culture.

Which one of the following argumentative strategies does the student use in responding to the historian?

(A) arguing that applying the historian's principle would require a knowledge of the past that is necessarily inaccessible to current scholarship

(B) attempting to undermine the historian's principle by showing that some of its consequences are inconsistent with each other

(C) showing that the principle the historian invokes, when applied to Alexander, does not justify the assertion that he was heroic

(D) questioning the historian's motivation for determining whether a standard of behavior has been raised or lowered

(E) claiming that one of the historian's criteria for judging Alexander is inconsistent with the principle that the historian has advanced
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 05 May 2003
Posts: 560
Location: Aus
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 17 Dec 2003, 11:38
Is it A ?
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 1031
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 17 Dec 2003, 12:13
E..
students disagree with one of the assertions
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Posts: 274
Location: USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 17 Dec 2003, 12:24
E
CEO
CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3550
Followers: 55

Kudos [?]: 626 [0], given: 781

Re: CR - Historian [#permalink] New post 17 Dec 2003, 13:02
asandeep wrote:
Historian: Alexander the Great should not be judged by appeal to current notions of justice. Alexander, an ancient figure of heroic stature, should be judged by the standards of his own culture. That is, did he live up to his culture's ideals of leadership? Did Alexander elevate the contemporary standards of justice? Was he, in his day, judged to be a just and wise ruler?

Student: But you cannot tell whether or not Alexander raised the contemporary standards of justice without invoking standards other than those of his own culture.

Which one of the following argumentative strategies does the student use in responding to the historian?

(A) arguing that applying the historian's principle would require a knowledge of the past that is necessarily inaccessible to current scholarship

(B) attempting to undermine the historian's principle by showing that some of its consequences are inconsistent with each other

(C) showing that the principle the historian invokes, when applied to Alexander, does not justify the assertion that he was heroic

(D) questioning the historian's motivation for determining whether a standard of behavior has been raised or lowered

(E) claiming that one of the historian's criteria for judging Alexander is inconsistent with the principle that the historian has advanced


E is best.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1683
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Dec 2003, 05:13
opt for E as well
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 327
Location: MI
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 18 Dec 2003, 07:29
:yes , E
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2007
Posts: 172
Location: Vienna, Austria
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - Historian [#permalink] New post 23 Jun 2008, 04:19
friends - this is a typical ambigous lsat one ... can someone explain the difference between A and E (OA) ?

many thanks
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Posts: 162
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Historian [#permalink] New post 23 Jun 2008, 07:23
Historian: Alexander the Great should not be judged by appeal to current notions of justice. Alexander, an ancient figure of heroic stature, should be judged by the standards of his own culture. That is, did he live up to his culture's ideals of leadership? Did Alexander elevate the contemporary standards of justice? Was he, in his day, judged to be a just and wise ruler?

Student: But you cannot tell whether or not Alexander raised the contemporary standards of justice without invoking standards other than those of his own culture.

Which one of the following argumentative strategies does the student use in responding to the historian?

(A) arguing that applying the historian's principle would require a knowledge of the past that is necessarily inaccessible to current scholarship
The argument here is about contemporary justice(during alexander's times) ..not justice prior to this time.

(E) claiming that one of the historian's criteria for judging Alexander is inconsistent with the principle that the historian has advanced

Student argues that Historian should take Standards of justice during alexanders times should take other cultures also into consideration. not just his(alexanders) own to determine whether he actually raised the contemporary. standards.

E suits the best.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Feb 2008
Posts: 317
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - Historian [#permalink] New post 23 Jun 2008, 11:59
asandeep wrote:
Historian: Alexander the Great should not be judged by appeal to current notions of justice. Alexander, an ancient figure of heroic stature, should be judged by the standards of his own culture. That is, did he live up to his culture's ideals of leadership? Did Alexander elevate the contemporary standards of justice? Was he, in his day, judged to be a just and wise ruler?

Student: But you cannot tell whether or not Alexander raised the contemporary standards of justice without invoking standards other than those of his own culture.

Which one of the following argumentative strategies does the student use in responding to the historian?

(A) arguing that applying the historian's principle would require a knowledge of the past that is necessarily inaccessible to current scholarship

(B) attempting to undermine the historian's principle by showing that some of its consequences are inconsistent with each other

(C) showing that the principle the historian invokes, when applied to Alexander, does not justify the assertion that he was heroic

(D) questioning the historian's motivation for determining whether a standard of behavior has been raised or lowered

(E) claiming that one of the historian's criteria for judging Alexander is inconsistent with the principle that the historian has advanced


I got E to.

What is the Historian stating?

According to the historian, Alexander should not be judged by present day nations of justice, rather should be judged by standards of his culture during his time and one of the criteria should be whether He (Alexander) did elevate contemporary standards of justice.

However the student, attacks his claim by pointing to a flaw in the Historian's claim (i.e. But you cannot tell whether or not Alexander ........)

E fits this perfectly.

(A) arguing that applying the historian's principle would require a knowledge of the past that is necessarily inaccessible to current scholarship - It is not stated anywhere that access to any knowledge is inaccesible. Out of scope.

(B) attempting to undermine the historian's principle by showing that some of its consequences are inconsistent with each other - Incorrect because The student does not state any consequence let alone several (some)

C is out of scope

D Also out of scope.
Re: CR - Historian   [#permalink] 23 Jun 2008, 11:59
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Popular new posts Historians generally agree that, of the great modern jpv 12 15 Mar 2005, 18:20
New posts Historian: Alexander the Great should not be judged by WinWinMBA 1 10 May 2005, 16:00
New posts Historians generally agree that, of the great modern priyankur_saha@ml.com 2 19 Aug 2008, 23:25
New posts 1 Historians generally agree that, of the great modern mailnavin1 4 14 Apr 2010, 07:36
Popular new posts 2 There was great debate among Greek historians whether the daagh 12 21 Oct 2010, 04:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Historian: Alexander the Great should not be judged by

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.