Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: If n is a prime number greater than 2, is 1/x > 1? [#permalink]
08 May 2013, 22:28

emmak wrote:

If n is a prime number greater than 2, is 1/x > 1? (1) x^n < x < x^{\frac{1}{n}} (2)x^{n-1} > x^{2n-2}

Couldn't the answer be [A],

Statement 1: for all n where n is prime and > 2, x^n < x < x^1/n. Since n>2, n must be odd. Hence the above values of x belongs to {0,1} will hold for the above equation. For -ve values of x, x^1/n will not be defined.

In such a case, 1/x>1 or x belongs to {0,1} -ve values again will not satisfy the equation.

Statement 2: x^(n-1) > x^2(n-1), for n being odd, n-1 will be even. Hence for the above equation the solution set will be {-1,1} As mentioned above, the negative values of x will not hold the 1/x>1 equation. Hence the range is again {0,1}.

This is only possible if x is a proper fraction .. if you want to check .. plugin the value of n as 3 or 5 .... Therefore, from this ....

we can say that x is a proper fraction.. Therefore. Sufficient ..

Statement :: 2 says ... x^{n-1} > x^{2n-2} ...

x^{n-1} > x^{2n-2}

In this one also if we plugin in the value of n as 3 or 5 ... we will get when n = 3 ...x^2 > x^4

& when n = 5 .. we will get x^4 > x^8 ....... Both of these states that x is a proper fraction .....

Therefore.. Sufficient ....

Hence, ...... D.......

I agree with Statement 1 being sufficient, but when it comes to Statement 2,

For example, x = -0.1, in such a case, assuming n is Odd and equal to 3, the inequality can be reduced to x^2>x^4. The value x = -0.1 satisfies.

Since the power term (n-1) will always be even, the inequality will hold good for even -ve numbers between {-1,0}. But when it comes to our parent equation: 1/-0.1 = -10 < 1. Hence the inequality doesn't satisfy. Therefore, I feel [A] should be the answer. Please look into my method and let me know if I am doing anything wrong! Also please refer to my post above for a general approach to the prob.

Re: If n is a prime number greater than 2, is 1/x > 1? [#permalink]
08 May 2013, 23:45

Expert's post

arpanpatnaik wrote:

emmak wrote:

If n is a prime number greater than 2, is 1/x > 1? (1) x^n < x < x^{\frac{1}{n}} (2)x^{n-1} > x^{2n-2}

Couldn't the answer be [A],

Statement 1: for all n where n is prime and > 2, x^n < x < x^1/n. Since n>2, n must be odd. Hence the above values of x belongs to {0,1} will hold for the above equation. For -ve values of x, x^1/n will not be defined.

Not true. As x>2 and is a prime number, x will always be an odd integer. For x = -8,x^{1/3} = -2. _________________

This is only possible if x is a proper fraction .. if you want to check .. plugin the value of n as 3 or 5 .... Therefore, from this ....

we can say that x is a proper fraction.. Therefore. Sufficient ..

Statement :: 2 says ... x^{n-1} > x^{2n-2} ...

x^{n-1} > x^{2n-2}

In this one also if we plugin in the value of n as 3 or 5 ... we will get when n = 3 ...x^2 > x^4

& when n = 5 .. we will get x^4 > x^8 ....... Both of these states that x is a proper fraction .....

Therefore.. Sufficient ....

Hence, ...... D.......

I agree with Statement 1 being sufficient, but when it comes to Statement 2,

For example, x = -0.1, in such a case, assuming n is Odd and equal to 3, the inequality can be reduced to x^2>x^4. The value x = -0.1 satisfies.

Since the power term (n-1) will always be even, the inequality will hold good for even -ve numbers between {-1,0}. But when it comes to our parent equation: 1/-0.1 = -10 < 1. Hence the inequality doesn't satisfy. Therefore, I feel [A] should be the answer. Please look into my method and let me know if I am doing anything wrong! Also please refer to my post above for a general approach to the prob.

Regards, Arpan

My answer is still A ... _________________

If you don’t make mistakes, you’re not working hard. And Now that’s a Huge mistake.

Last edited by manishuol on 09 May 2013, 00:34, edited 2 times in total.

Re: If n is a prime number greater than 2, is 1/x > 1? [#permalink]
09 May 2013, 00:06

vinaymimani wrote:

arpanpatnaik wrote:

emmak wrote:

If n is a prime number greater than 2, is 1/x > 1? (1) x^n < x < x^{\frac{1}{n}} (2)x^{n-1} > x^{2n-2}

Couldn't the answer be [A],

Statement 1: for all n where n is prime and > 2, x^n < x < x^1/n. Since n>2, n must be odd. Hence the above values of x belongs to {0,1} will hold for the above equation. For -ve values of x, x^1/n will not be defined.

Not true. As n>2 and is a prime number, will n always be an odd integer. For x = -8,x^{1/3} = -2.

My Bad!! I missed that... Thanks for correcting me Vinay! I got the answer now! [C] it is Can't believe I used the odd principle in Statement 2 and failed to use it in Statement 1. The range x < -1 will be valid and the solution set needs to be an intersection of Statement 1 and 2 i.e. x belongs to {0,1}.

Re: If n is a prime number greater than 2, is 1/x > 1? [#permalink]
28 Oct 2014, 10:26

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________

Re: If n is a prime number greater than 2, is 1/x > 1? [#permalink]
29 Oct 2014, 23:49

the question asks if 1/x > 1 or, 1/x - 1 > 0 or, (1-x) / x > 0 again for the above condition to be true; (1-x) > 0 and x > 0 or (1-x) < 0 and x<0 (for x<0, 1-x can never be less than 0, hence ignore this) basically the question asks if 0 < x < 1 <----------- this is what we need to find, does x lie between 0 and 1??

statement 1 is clearly insufficient

i've got a doubt here with statement 2.

x^(n-1) > x^(2n-2) => (x^(n-1)) - (x^(2n-2)) > 0 => (x^n/x) - (x^2n/x^2) > 0 => x^n/x (1-x^n/x) > 0 taking x^n/x common outside the bracket => for the above condition to be true either or x^n/x > 0 and (1- x^n/x) > 0 x^n/x < 0 and (1 - x^n/x) < 0 when x^n/x > 0, when x^n/x < 0, (1 - x^n/x) can never be less than 0 it means for (1 - x^n/x) > 0 hence, we can ignore this option x^n/x has to be a fraction between 0 and 1 i.e. 0< x^n/x < 1 or, 0 < x^(n-1) < 1

when x^(n-1) is between 0 and 1, and n is a prime number greater than 2, it implies that x is a fraction between 0 and 1 and x^(n-1) will always be positive and true for any value between 0 and 1. in that case Statement 2 is satisfying what we are asked to find out. statement 2 should be sufficient. correct me if i am wrong.

Re: If n is a prime number greater than 2, is 1/x > 1? [#permalink]
30 Oct 2014, 07:52

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

emmak wrote:

If n is a prime number greater than 2, is 1/x > 1?

(1) x^n < x < x^{\frac{1}{n}}

(2)x^{n-1} > x^{2n-2}

Statement 1 -> will be true for negative integers and positive fractions. So X can either be a negative integer or positive fraction. If X is a negative integer 1/X will not be greater than 1 but if X is a positive fraction 1/X will be greater than 1. So we have two possibilities.

Hence Statement 1 alone is insufficient.

Statement 2 -> Will be true for negative and positive fractions. If X is a negative fraction 1/X will not be greater than 1 but if X is a positive fraction 1/X will be greater than 1. So we have two possibilities.

Hence Statement 2 alone is insufficient.

But for both statement 1 and 2 to be true, X can only be a positive fraction. Here 1/X will be greater than 1.

Re: If n is a prime number greater than 2, is 1/x > 1? [#permalink]
01 Nov 2014, 07:12

emmak wrote:

If n is a prime number greater than 2, is 1/x > 1?

(1) x^n < x < x^{\frac{1}{n}}

(2)x^{n-1} > x^{2n-2}

I got A for this one.

1) x^n < x < x^(1/n) n = odd (since it is prime and > 2) so the inequality will hold true only for 0 < x < 1 it will not hold true for -ve x as in that case x^(1/n) would be an imaginary number. so this is sufficient.

2) x^(n-1) > x^(2n-2) => x^(n-1) > x^2(n-1) n=odd, so n-1=even=2k(say) x^2k > x^4k this inequality holds true for -1<x<1 so insufficient.

Is the OA correct? Bunuel can you please have a look at this one. _________________

Re: If n is a prime number greater than 2, is 1/x > 1? [#permalink]
01 Nov 2014, 07:38

Expert's post

thefibonacci wrote:

emmak wrote:

If n is a prime number greater than 2, is 1/x > 1?

(1) x^n < x < x^{\frac{1}{n}}

(2)x^{n-1} > x^{2n-2}

I got A for this one.

1) x^n < x < x^(1/n) n = odd (since it is prime and > 2) so the inequality will hold true only for 0 < x < 1 it will not hold true for -ve x as in that case x^(1/n) would be an imaginary number. so this is sufficient.

2) x^(n-1) > x^(2n-2) => x^(n-1) > x^2(n-1) n=odd, so n-1=even=2k(say) x^2k > x^4k this inequality holds true for -1<x<1 so insufficient.

Is the OA correct? Bunuel can you please have a look at this one.

Odd root from negative number is negative, not imaginary. For, example, \sqrt[3]{-8}=-2.

The question asks whether 0 < x < 1. For (1) check x = -8 and n = 3 prime. _________________

If n is a prime number greater than 2, is 1/x > 1? [#permalink]
01 Nov 2014, 07:47

Bunuel wrote:

thefibonacci wrote:

emmak wrote:

If n is a prime number greater than 2, is 1/x > 1?

(1) x^n < x < x^{\frac{1}{n}}

(2)x^{n-1} > x^{2n-2}

I got A for this one.

1) x^n < x < x^(1/n) n = odd (since it is prime and > 2) so the inequality will hold true only for 0 < x < 1 it will not hold true for -ve x as in that case x^(1/n) would be an imaginary number. so this is sufficient.

2) x^(n-1) > x^(2n-2) => x^(n-1) > x^2(n-1) n=odd, so n-1=even=2k(say) x^2k > x^4k this inequality holds true for -1<x<1 so insufficient.

Is the OA correct? Bunuel can you please have a look at this one.

Odd root from negative number is negative, not imaginary. For, example, \sqrt[3]{-8}=-2.

The question asks whether 0 < x < 1. For (1) check x = -8 and n = 3 prime.

Well, I’ve had a busy month! In February I traveled to interview and visit three MBA programs. Earlier in the month I also went to Florida on vacation. This...

One of the reasons why I even considered Tepper is the location. Last summer I stopped in Pittsburgh on the way home from a road trip. We were vacationing...

“Which French bank was fined $613bn for manipulating the Euribor rate?” asked quizmaster Andrew Hill in this year’s FT MBA Quiz. “Société Générale” responded the...