Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 19:21 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 19:21

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 135
Own Kudos [?]: 267 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 19 Apr 2008
Posts: 172
Own Kudos [?]: 382 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Posts: 413
Own Kudos [?]: 368 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: Eastern Europe
Schools:Oxford
 Q49  V42
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 135
Own Kudos [?]: 267 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: if x is a positive integer x = ? (1) {(x-5)(x+4)}^1/2 >10 [#permalink]
greenoak wrote:
Hi, vdhawan1!

I agree with the solution that the previous author has posted, but still decided to post since it might be helpful for you to know where the flaw in your reasoning was.

This is how you approached the inequality:

Quote:
(x-5)(x+4) >100

which means x-5>100 or x+4 >100.


This is where the mistake is. In general, a*b>c is not equivalent to a>c or b>c. In fact, the latter does not even follow from the former. Consider a*b>6, for example. a=2, b=4 satisfy this inequality, while neither is greater than 6.

Then, you wrote

Quote:
(x-5)(x+4) <121

which means x-5<121 or x+4 <121


Here you applied the same method. While in this case x-5<121 or x+4 <121 indeed follow from the initial inequality, this two inequalities are not equivalent to the initial one, since the range of possible solutions for the system of these two inequalities is larger than that of the initial inequality. Consider x=100. It is one of the solutions of the system {x-5<121 or x+4 <121}, but not of the initial inequality.

In general, I think that it might be useful to review the properties of inequalities of various types, the equivalent ways to transform them etc.


ok i see the mistake now and thanks a lot for pointing it out

i have reviewed the wiki guide (https://gmatclub.com/wiki/Algebra) on this and i see the following

consider the following example

x^2>x
x^2-x>0
x(x-1) >0
now either both x>0 and x-1>0 which translates to x>0 and x>1
or
both x<0 and x-1<0 which translates to x<0 and x<1
so the solution can be
x>1 or x<0

now coming back to the question
(x-5)(x+4) >100
therefore this means
(x-5)>100 or (x-5)<100 which translates to x>105 or x<105

(x+4) >100 or (x+4)<100 which translates to x>96 or x<96
combining both statements together we get the solution
as
x>96 or x<96

similarly
now coming back to the question
(x-5)(x+4) <121
therefore this means
(x-5)<121 or (x-5)>121 which translates to x<126 or x>126

so statement 1 does not help

(x+4) <121 or (x+4)>121 which translates to x<117 or x>125
combining both statements together we get the solution
as
x<117 or x>125
so statement 2 does not help
combining 2 statements together we get
x<117 or x>125

from this again it can be any value greater than 125 or less than 117

so shdnt E be the answer

wud appreciate u r help , if u can tell me where exactly i am going wrong
Many thanks
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Posts: 960
Own Kudos [?]: 693 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: Madrid
 Q51  V50
Send PM
Re: if x is a positive integer x = ? (1) {(x-5)(x+4)}^1/2 >10 [#permalink]
If x is a positive integer x = ?

(1) {(x-5)(x+4)}^1/2 >10
(2) {(x-5)(x+4)}^1/2 <11


Together, we see that 100 < (x - 5)(x + 4) < 121, where x is a positive integer

Note that x - 5 and x + 4 differ by 9

15 x 6 < 100
100 < 16 x 7 < 121
17 x 8 > 121

Thus x + 4 must be 16, i.e. x = 12
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Posts: 413
Own Kudos [?]: 368 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: Eastern Europe
Schools:Oxford
 Q49  V42
Send PM
Re: if x is a positive integer x = ? (1) {(x-5)(x+4)}^1/2 >10 [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Hello again, vdhawan1!

Quote:
now coming back to the question
(x-5)(x+4) >100
therefore this means
(x-5)>100 or (x-5)<100 which translates to x>105 or x<105


If we have zero on the right side, this reasoning would be correct. Otherwise, it is not applicable. So, in this case, in order to apply this logic, we should transform the equation so that it will have zero.

Thus, we may write:
(x-5)(x+4) = x^2-x-20 and thus we obtain
x^2-x-20>100 and consequently
x^2-x-120>0


This last one we could have solved by factorizing (theoretically), as you suggested, only it is not practical in the given example, because the roots of this quadratic equation are not integers, and we are looking for an integer x. Moreover, from the form of the last equation, it is clear that we have infinite possibilities for x, so clearly it is not suff.

That’s why it’s better to left the equation in form:
x^2-x>120 =>
x(x-1)>120

and look at the second one.

The equation from the second condition, written as x^2-x-141<0, again, leaves more than one possibility for x and it’s impractical to solve the q. equation, again.

So, let’s leave it in the form x(x-1)<141

And, finally, we have
120< x(x-1)< 141

and at this stage it’s time to pick numbers :) . Luckily, only one possibility for x, namely x=12, satisfies the equation.

***
So, in general, if you have an eq. of the kind (x-a)(x-b)>c (or < c), you may apply the reasoning you described only if c=0. Otherwise, it won’t work, and we need to search for another approach.
P.S. I've PM you.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 135
Own Kudos [?]: 267 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: if x is a positive integer x = ? (1) {(x-5)(x+4)}^1/2 >10 [#permalink]
greenoak wrote:
Hello again, vdhawan1!

Quote:
now coming back to the question
(x-5)(x+4) >100
therefore this means
(x-5)>100 or (x-5)105 or x100 and consequently
x^2-x-120>0


This last one we could have solved by factorizing (theoretically), as you suggested, only it is not practical in the given example, because the roots of this quadratic equation are not integers, and we are looking for an integer x. Moreover, from the form of the last equation, it is clear that we have infinite possibilities for x, so clearly it is not suff.

That’s why it’s better to left the equation in form:
x^2-x>120 =>
x(x-1)>120

and look at the second one.

The equation from the second condition, written as x^2-x-141c (or < c), you may apply the reasoning you described only if c=0. Otherwise, it won’t work, and we need to search for another approach.
P.S. I've PM you.



Greenoak

Buddy cant thank u enough for this help

now i see where i m going wrong

Kudos to u for this



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: if x is a positive integer x = ? (1) {(x-5)(x+4)}^1/2 >10 [#permalink]
Moderators:
Math Expert
92915 posts
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
3137 posts
GMAT Tutor
1905 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne