Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Aug 2014, 00:30

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1226
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane [#permalink] New post 28 Dec 2004, 21:49
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane manufacturer implemented a program with the well-publicized goal of reducing by half the total yearly amount of hazardous waste generated by its passenger-jet division. When the program began in 1994, the
division’s hazardous waste output was 90 pounds per production worker; last year it was 40 pounds per production worker. Clearly, therefore, charges that the manufacturer’s program has not met its goal are false.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The amount of nonhazardous waste generated each year by the passenger-jet division has not increased significantly since 1994.

B. At least as many passenger jets were produced by the division last year as had been produced in 1994.

C. Since 1994, other divisions in the company have achieved reductions in hazardous waste output that are at least equal to that achieved in the passenger-jet division.

D. The average number of weekly hours per production worker in the passenger-jet division was not significantly greater last year than it was in 1994.

E. The number of production workers assigned to the passenger-jet division was not significantly less in 1994 than it was last year.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 728
Location: Milwaukee
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 Dec 2004, 15:48
E it is, good one :shock:
_________________

Praveen

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1226
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 Dec 2004, 18:22
praveen_rao7 wrote:
E it is, good one :shock:


Hello,

Could you explain? Please

Because I think the question described the production of each worker, is there any matter with the number of worker?
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 728
Location: Milwaukee
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 Dec 2004, 18:43
chunjuwu wrote:
praveen_rao7 wrote:
E it is, good one :shock:


Hello,

Could you explain? Please

Because I think the question described the production of each worker, is there any matter with the number of worker?


This is a really bad twisted question. Here Author employs -ve of a -ve is +ve technique. The key to solving this problem is to understand the last sentence "Clearly, therefore, charges that the manufacturer’s program has not met its goal are false" really means "clearly the goal has been met". Now, if you read the question in this context you would see in order for author's assumption to be true E has to be assumed. Does it make sense now?.
_________________

Praveen

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2004
Posts: 489
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 Dec 2004, 18:45
i am between B and E. there is a significant relationship between the number of workers in production and actual planes produced. if they build the same number of planes in both yeras, [choice B] => waste per worker goes from 90 to 40 for the same amount of planes => they cut the waste more than half. hence answer B

but E on the other hand might also be a good assumption. the wording in E seems strange to me. anyone has a better explanation on E please post it. whats the OA??
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 1498
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 Dec 2004, 19:03
I agree with E.............................................
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1447
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 Dec 2004, 20:04
"E" it is.

It is a good ques. Had me thinking between D and E. However, there is only 1 measure of failure of success here, that is total prod waste should reduce. Author assumes that Total waste (i.e. measure of success)= lbs / worker * no of workers. Author is clearly assuming that between the yrs the no of workers r same and the total waste can be directly proportional to lbs/worker. "B" is out of scope as the stem doesn't tell anything abt a relation between production of no of planes to waste prod, relation is only between workers and waste.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Sep 2004
Posts: 371
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 Dec 2004, 20:58
Yes! E it is. Praveen god exp! :good

Saurabh Malpani
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Dec 2004
Posts: 228
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 Dec 2004, 21:45
chunjuwu wrote:
praveen_rao7 wrote:
E it is, good one :shock:


Hello,

Could you explain? Please

Because I think the question described the production of each worker, is there any matter with the number of worker?


E is the right choice. B is a trap/decoy. same number of workers with each creating less waste in pound.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Posts: 606
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 25 Jul 2005, 15:38
Can somebody refute D?
_________________

Regards, S

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2004
Posts: 120
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 25 Jul 2005, 15:47
I picked E as well but am curious to see some one refute B
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 726
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 25 Jul 2005, 16:04
B talks about count of planes. There is no data in the argument that says the higher the # of planes, the higher is the waste. May be there are some planes who discharge less and some discharge more. This way the overall affect is same.

Take an example with E.

1994 - Lets say there were 100 workers, so total = 90*100 = 9000
2005 - Lets say workers have increaded 10 times = 40 * 1000 = 40,000

So clearly # of workers affect the conclusion.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Posts: 606
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 25 Jul 2005, 16:23
How about D? Does it mean that fewer employees are giving the desired ratio of waste/worker by working more hours?
_________________

Regards, S

  [#permalink] 25 Jul 2005, 16:23
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane KC 8 17 Oct 2006, 20:47
In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane Gauss 14 15 Jul 2006, 01:03
In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane gamjatang 18 07 Dec 2005, 07:15
In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane nakib77 18 20 Sep 2005, 10:31
In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane DLMD 6 13 Jan 2005, 15:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.