Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

there is no need for much calculation,
simply switch their X and Y

P and Q are always perpendicular and same distance from O

OP is perpendicular to OQ means you rotate OQ 90 degrees, you will
get OP, in terms of X,Y value, that is just to switch them and flip the sign
to have (-Y,X)

There are more than one way to solve this. I like this way

The line PO has slope =-1/√3 The line QO has slope = t/s PO and QO is perpendicular so [-1/√3]*t/s = -1 ==> t/s =√3 or √3/1 so s = 1

I know I write like this [the colored] will raise the disscussion. In general slope of PO = a/b slope of QO = t/s PO and QO is perpendicular so [a/b]*[t/s]=-1, so t/s = -b/a In this case, b = √3, a = -1 , so t/s = [-√3]/[-1] = √3/1, so s =1 _________________

There are more than one way to solve this. I like this way

The line PO has slope =-1/√3 The line QO has slope = t/s PO and QO is perpendicular so [-1/√3]*t/s = -1 ==> t/s =√3 or √3/1 so s = 1

I know I write like this [the colored] will raise the disscussion. In general slope of PO = a/b slope of QO = t/s PO and QO is perpendicular so [a/b]*[t/s]=-1, so t/s = -b/a In this case, b = √3, a = -1 , so t/s = [-√3]/[-1] = √3/1, so s =1

From the picture t^2 +s^2 = 4(radius = 2) By substituting t =√3s we get s=1

Re: coordinate geometry [#permalink]
16 Jun 2009, 09:18

15

This post received KUDOS

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

The answer is B.

Lets see how: First draw a perpendicular from the x-axis to the point P. Lets call the point on the x-axis N. Now we have a right angle triangle \triangle NOP. We are given the co-ordinates of P as (-\sqrt{3}, 1). i.e. ON=\sqrt{3} and PN=1. Also we know angle PNO=90\textdegree. If you notice this is a 30\textdegree-60\textdegree-90\textdegreetriangle with sides 1-sqrt3-2 and angle NOP=30\textdegree.

Similarly draw another perpendicular from the x-axis to point Q. Lets call the point on the x-axis R. Now we have a right angle triangle \triangle QOR. We know angle QRO=90\textdegree.

There's a simple reason and misconception as to why people find this question confusing: --> the 90 degree angle between P and Q seems like it is cut perfectly right down the centre >> to make two 45 degree angles. --> that's why your brain instinctively thinks the answer is r = sq(3), since the distance seems the same from the left and to the right of the origin!

However, that's the trick to this question and that's why it is CRUCIAL that you train yourself to be highly critical and weary of accepting the simple answer!

Upon closer inspection of the question:

P(-sq(3),1) Which means the triangle beneath point P has: height = 1 base = sq(3) meaning >> radius = 2 (30-60-90 triangle)

This follows the ideal case of the 30-60-90 triangle, which means that opposite to the height of 1, there is an angle of 30 degrees from the x-axis to point P. This means that from the y-axis to point P, there is an angle of 60 degrees (to make a 90 degrees total from x-axis to y-axis). Therefore on the right side, since the figure shows there is a 90 degree angle between point P and Q, 60 degrees have been taken up from the left of the y-axis, which leaves 30 degrees on the right of the y-axis. Furthermore, this leaves 60 degrees from Point Q to the positive x-axis. Therefore, making the exact same 30-60-90 triangle once again, since the radius is the same (the two points lie on the semi-circle). The 60 degree angle is now where the 30 degree angle was on the other triangle, which makes the height now sq(3) and base now 1 >> therefore, base r = 1!

**Have a look at the attachment and then it should make perfect sense!

Attachments

gmatprep-PSgeoQ.jpg [ 20.74 KiB | Viewed 39108 times ]

Re: Plane Geometry, Semicircle from GMATPrep [#permalink]
11 Oct 2009, 11:48

2

This post received KUDOS

Since OP and OQ are the radii of the circle, and we know P has co-ordinates (-\sqrt{3}, 1), from the distance formula we have OP = OQ = 2. Therefore, s^2+t^2=4. -> (1) Also from the right triangle, we know the length of PQ=2\sqrt{2}. Again, using the distance formula, (s+\sqrt{3})^2 + (t-1)^2 = PQ^2 = 8. ->(2)

From (1) and (2) you can solve for s. Hope this helps.

Re: Plane Geometry, Semicircle from GMATPrep [#permalink]
13 Oct 2009, 04:29

DenisSh wrote:

Sorry, didn't get that part:

badgerboy wrote:

Again, using the distance formula, (s+\sqrt{3})^2 + (t-1)^2 = PQ^2 = 8. ->(2)

The method used to find the length of OP or OQ from origin i.e. the distance formula has been used here as well to find the length of PQ with P as (-[square_root]3,1) and Q as (s,t) which gives us {s - (-[square_root]3)}^2 + {t-1}^2 = PQ^2 = 8 ->equation 2

from Right angle Triangle POQ we had got the length of PQ^2 as 8

Re: Plane Geometry, Semicircle from GMATPrep [#permalink]
09 Nov 2009, 19:25

1

This post received KUDOS

Correct me if I'm wrong, (and forgive my english) the coordinates of a point p(x,y) that lays on a circle can be expressed as p(sen,cos). we know that sen π/6 = cos π/3, and that sen π/3 = cos π/6

in this case I just have to invert x with y and y with x -> indeed we have p(y,x)

As we know x and y have to be positive we have to change the sign for x, the new coordinates are p (y,-x).

in this way to solve the problem doesn't take more than 20 secs. hope I was enough clear.

Re: coordinate geometry [#permalink]
17 Nov 2009, 22:51

Because the explanation by IndianGuardian seems incorrect:

Lets see how: First draw a perpendicular from the x-axis to the point P. Lets call the point on the x-axis N. Now we have a right angle triangle \triangle NOP. We are given the co-ordinates of P as (-\sqrt{3}, 1). i.e. ON=\sqrt{3} and PN=1. Also we know angle PNO=90\textdegree. If you notice this is a 30\textdegree-60\textdegree-90\textdegreetriangle with sides 1-sqrt3-2 and angle NOP=30\textdegree.

The coordinates of point P is (-\sqrt{3}, 1) ie ON = 1 and PN = root3 - not the other way round as explained in his posting quoted in blue above.

I get PO = QO = 2 (RADIUS) POQ is a rt angled Triangle. Hence, isn't PN = 2 sqrt2 ? So wouldn't s = 2 sqrt2 - sqrt3

I need someone like Bunuel or walker to look at my statement and tell if this is true.

Since OP and OQ are perpendicular to each other and since OP=OQ=2(radius) , the coordinates of Q are same as P but in REVERSE order, keep the sign +/- based on Quandrant it lies. in this case Q(1,\sqrt{3)}.

I need someone like Bunuel or walker to look at my statement and tell if this is true.

Since OP and OQ are perpendicular to each other and since OP=OQ=2(radius) , the coordinates of Q are same as P but in REVERSE order, keep the sign +/- based on Quandrant it lies. in this case Q(1,\sqrt{3)}.

In the figure above, points P and Q lie on the circle with center O. What is the value of s?

Yes you are right.

Point Q in I quadrant (1, \sqrt{3}); Point P in II quadrant (-\sqrt{3}, 1); Point T in III quadrant (-1, -\sqrt{3}) (OT perpendicular to OP); Point R in IV quadrant (\sqrt{3},-1) (OR perpendicular to OQ). _________________

Re: Plane Geometry, Semicircle from GMATPrep [#permalink]
18 Jun 2010, 03:35

I understood bunuel's solution ok but i have a problem with the other one.

I got every step of maths but how did you get (t-1) too. However How did you decide that "t" is bigger than 1. Because it can be less then one then it should became (1-t). Can anyone explain it plz just that part??

hey guys, A metallurgist but currently working in a NGO and have scheduled my GMAT in December for second round .....u know. I read some but valuable blogs on this...

One thing I did not know when recruiting for the MBA summer internship was the following: just how important prior experience in the function that you're recruiting for...