Last visit was: 04 May 2024, 01:29 It is currently 04 May 2024, 01:29

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Difficulty: Sub 505 Levelx   Inequalitiesx                           
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Jan 2016
Status:Persevere
Posts: 107
Own Kudos [?]: 3611 [20]
Given Kudos: 94
Location: Hong Kong
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V41
GPA: 3.52
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Jan 2016
Posts: 57
Own Kudos [?]: 72 [7]
Given Kudos: 71
Location: United States
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.5
WE:Supply Chain Management (Consumer Electronics)
Send PM
General Discussion
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 10160
Own Kudos [?]: 16637 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Send PM
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Posts: 18807
Own Kudos [?]: 22131 [0]
Given Kudos: 283
Location: United States (CA)
Send PM
Re: Is k + m < 0 ? (1) k < 0 (2) km > 0 [#permalink]
Expert Reply
nalinnair wrote:
Is k + m < 0 ?


(1) k < 0
(2) km > 0


(DS09260)

Solution:

Question Stem Analysis:


We need to determine whether k + m < 0.

Statement One Alone:

We are given that the value of k is negative. However, without knowing anything about the value of m, we can’t determine whether k + m < 0. Statement one alone is not sufficient.

Statement Two Alone:

We are given that the value of km is positive, which means either k and m are both positive or they are both negative. If they are both positive, then k + m is not less than 0. On the other hand, if they are both negative, then k + m is less than 0. Statement two is not sufficient.

Statements One and Two Together:

From statement one, we know that k is negative. From statement two, we know that km > 0. Thus, m must also be negative. Since both k and m are negative, we see that k + m is indeed less than 0. Both statements are sufficient.

Answer: C
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 May 2021
Posts: 49
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [1]
Given Kudos: 108
Send PM
Re: Is k + m < 0 ? (1) k < 0 (2) km > 0 [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Here instead of taking cases we can only consider what sign will hold the equation :
Is k + m < 0 ?
this means is
1) k and m both are -ve
2) one is neg and its magnitude is greater than the +ve one

(1) k < 0 : this means k is -ve but we don't know about m which can be -ve or +ve - Not sufficient.
(2) km > 0 : this means both are having same sign either +ve or -ve - Not sufficient.

(1) &(2) : combine give me k is -ve and km > 0 means m has to be -ve
so both are -ve -- Sufficient as per 1) condition.

And C
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Feb 2022
Posts: 79
Own Kudos [?]: 763 [0]
Given Kudos: 69
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Send PM
Re: Is k + m < 0 ? (1) k < 0 (2) km > 0 [#permalink]
Bunuel

Can this question be solved algebraically?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Dec 2022
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 39
Send PM
Re: Is k + m < 0 ? (1) k < 0 (2) km > 0 [#permalink]
ScottTargetTestPrep wrote:
nalinnair wrote:
Is k + m < 0 ?


(1) k < 0
(2) km > 0


(DS09260)

Solution:

Question Stem Analysis:


We need to determine whether k + m < 0.

Statement One Alone:

We are given that the value of k is negative. However, without knowing anything about the value of m, we can’t determine whether k + m < 0. Statement one alone is not sufficient.

Statement Two Alone:

We are given that the value of km is positive, which means either k and m are both positive or they are both negative. If they are both positive, then k + m is not less than 0. On the other hand, if they are both negative, then k + m is less than 0. Statement two is not sufficient.

Statements One and Two Together:

From statement one, we know that k is negative. From statement two, we know that km > 0. Thus, m must also be negative. Since both k and m are negative, we see that k + m is indeed less than 0. Both statements are sufficient.

Answer: C



why can't I assume from the question that k < 0-m and B would be sufficient?
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Is k + m < 0 ? (1) k < 0 (2) km > 0 [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
93025 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne