Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but Statement (2) ALONE is not sufficient Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but Statement (1) ALONE is not sufficient BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient EACH statement ALONE is sufficient Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficien

Using (1), X^2 = X => X can be 0 or 1 [not sufficient]

Using (2), X+3 is a primer number => X can be -1,0,2,........ [not sufficient]

Combining (1) and (2), X is 0 [sufficient]

(C) it is.

I understand that x can be 0 or 1 in the first statement. However, I'm just wondering algebraically why you couldn't cancel out (x+1) in the equation (x+1)(x-1)=x+1 ? There must be some rule broken if you do, because it will give you a definite solution, which is wrong. Any thoughts?

Using (1), X^2 = X => X can be 0 or 1 [not sufficient]

Using (2), X+3 is a primer number => X can be -1,0,2,........ [not sufficient]

Combining (1) and (2), X is 0 [sufficient]

(C) it is.

I understand that x can be 0 or 1 in the first statement. However, I'm just wondering algebraically why you couldn't cancel out (x+1) in the equation (x+1)(x-1)=x+1 ? There must be some rule broken if you do, because it will give you a definite solution, which is wrong. Any thoughts?

Never reduce equation by variable (or expression with variable), if you are not certain that variable (or expression with variable) doesn't equal to zero. We can not divide by zero.

So, if you divide (reduce) \(x^2=x\) by \(x\), you assume, with no ground for it, that \(x\) does not equal to zero thus exclude a possible solution.

Using (1), X^2 = X => X can be 0 or 1 [not sufficient]

Using (2), X+3 is a primer number => X can be -1,0,2,........ [not sufficient]

Combining (1) and (2), X is 0 [sufficient]

(C) it is.

I understand that x can be 0 or 1 in the first statement. However, I'm just wondering algebraically why you couldn't cancel out (x+1) in the equation (x+1)(x-1)=x+1 ? There must be some rule broken if you do, because it will give you a definite solution, which is wrong. Any thoughts?

Never reduce equation by variable (or expression with variable), if you are not certain that variable (or expression with variable) doesn't equal to zero. We can not divide by zero.

So, if you divide (reduce) \(x^2=x\) by \(x\), you assume, with no ground for it, that \(x\) does not equal to zero thus exclude a possible solution.

Hope it's clear.

Hi Bunnel,

How will x=0 satisfy in the 1st equation the possible values for 1st statement are -1 and 2....so not sufficient

statement 2

From statement 2 the possible values are -1, 2 0 .....so not sufficient

Even after combining we have 2 values satisfying the above statements i.e -1 and 2 so Not sufficient _________________

Using (1), X^2 = X => X can be 0 or 1 [not sufficient]

Using (2), X+3 is a primer number => X can be -1,0,2,........ [not sufficient]

Combining (1) and (2), X is 0 [sufficient]

(C) it is.

Your equation \(x^2 = x\) is incorrect. It seems that you missed the signs, as in the lefthand side you have \(-1\) and in the righthand side you have \(+1\). The two don't cancel out.

The correct equation is \(x^2-x-2=0\) or \((x+1)(x-2)=0\), which has two solutions, \(x=-1\) and \(x=2.\) _________________

PhD in Applied Mathematics Love GMAT Quant questions and running.

Using (1), X^2 = X => X can be 0 or 1 [not sufficient]

Using (2), X+3 is a primer number => X can be -1,0,2,........ [not sufficient]

Combining (1) and (2), X is 0 [sufficient]

(C) it is.

I understand that x can be 0 or 1 in the first statement. However, I'm just wondering algebraically why you couldn't cancel out (x+1) in the equation (x+1)(x-1)=x+1 ? There must be some rule broken if you do, because it will give you a definite solution, which is wrong. Any thoughts?

Never reduce equation by variable (or expression with variable), if you are not certain that variable (or expression with variable) doesn't equal to zero. We can not divide by zero.

So, if you divide (reduce) \(x^2=x\) by \(x\), you assume, with no ground for it, that \(x\) does not equal to zero thus exclude a possible solution.

Hope it's clear.

Hi Bunnel,

How will x=0 satisfy in the 1st equation the possible values for 1st statement are -1 and 2....so not sufficient

statement 2

From statement 2 the possible values are -1, 2 0 .....so not sufficient

Even after combining we have 2 values satisfying the above statements i.e -1 and 2 so Not sufficient

x=0 won't satisfy the first equation. if ur referring to the rule to not divide by zero that bunuel just mentioned, it applies to the whole expression (x+1) in this problem. you cant divide by (x+1) because it could equal zero, and it does when x=-1...x=0 does not satisfy the equation, so u are correct