Last visit was: 01 May 2026, 08:51 It is currently 01 May 2026, 08:51
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
shrive555
Joined: 15 Sep 2010
Last visit: 26 Jun 2016
Posts: 201
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 193
Status:Do and Die!!
Posts: 201
Kudos: 2,636
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GyanOne
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Last visit: 29 Apr 2026
Posts: 3,241
Own Kudos:
1,725
 [1]
Given Kudos: 33
Status: World Rank #4 MBA Admissions Consultant
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,241
Kudos: 1,725
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
shrive555
Joined: 15 Sep 2010
Last visit: 26 Jun 2016
Posts: 201
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 193
Status:Do and Die!!
Posts: 201
Kudos: 2,636
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
dandarth1
Joined: 23 Aug 2012
Last visit: 29 Apr 2013
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 7
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GyanOne
Using (1), X^2 = X
=> X can be 0 or 1 [not sufficient]

Using (2), X+3 is a primer number
=> X can be -1,0,2,........ [not sufficient]

Combining (1) and (2), X is 0 [sufficient]

(C) it is.

I understand that x can be 0 or 1 in the first statement. However, I'm just wondering algebraically why you couldn't cancel out (x+1) in the equation (x+1)(x-1)=x+1 ? There must be some rule broken if you do, because it will give you a definite solution, which is wrong. Any thoughts?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 01 May 2026
Posts: 109,994
Own Kudos:
812,296
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,972
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,994
Kudos: 812,296
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dandarth1
GyanOne
Using (1), X^2 = X
=> X can be 0 or 1 [not sufficient]

Using (2), X+3 is a primer number
=> X can be -1,0,2,........ [not sufficient]

Combining (1) and (2), X is 0 [sufficient]

(C) it is.

I understand that x can be 0 or 1 in the first statement. However, I'm just wondering algebraically why you couldn't cancel out (x+1) in the equation (x+1)(x-1)=x+1 ? There must be some rule broken if you do, because it will give you a definite solution, which is wrong. Any thoughts?

Never reduce equation by variable (or expression with variable), if you are not certain that variable (or expression with variable) doesn't equal to zero. We can not divide by zero.

So, if you divide (reduce) \(x^2=x\) by \(x\), you assume, with no ground for it, that \(x\) does not equal to zero thus exclude a possible solution.

Hope it's clear.
User avatar
mydreammba
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Last visit: 06 Dec 2013
Posts: 224
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, General Management
GPA: 3.86
WE:Accounting (Commercial Banking)
Posts: 224
Kudos: 1,679
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
dandarth1
GyanOne
Using (1), X^2 = X
=> X can be 0 or 1 [not sufficient]

Using (2), X+3 is a primer number
=> X can be -1,0,2,........ [not sufficient]

Combining (1) and (2), X is 0 [sufficient]

(C) it is.

I understand that x can be 0 or 1 in the first statement. However, I'm just wondering algebraically why you couldn't cancel out (x+1) in the equation (x+1)(x-1)=x+1 ? There must be some rule broken if you do, because it will give you a definite solution, which is wrong. Any thoughts?

Never reduce equation by variable (or expression with variable), if you are not certain that variable (or expression with variable) doesn't equal to zero. We can not divide by zero.

So, if you divide (reduce) \(x^2=x\) by \(x\), you assume, with no ground for it, that \(x\) does not equal to zero thus exclude a possible solution.

Hope it's clear.

Hi Bunnel,

How will x=0 satisfy in the 1st equation the possible values for 1st statement are -1 and 2....so not sufficient

statement 2

From statement 2 the possible values are -1, 2 0 .....so not sufficient

Even after combining we have 2 values satisfying the above statements i.e -1 and 2 so Not sufficient
User avatar
EvaJager
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 31 Aug 2016
Posts: 513
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
WE:Science (Education)
Posts: 513
Kudos: 2,372
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GyanOne
Using (1), X^2 = X
=> X can be 0 or 1 [not sufficient]

Using (2), X+3 is a primer number
=> X can be -1,0,2,........ [not sufficient]

Combining (1) and (2), X is 0 [sufficient]

(C) it is.

Your equation \(x^2 = x\) is incorrect. It seems that you missed the signs, as in the lefthand side you have \(-1\) and in the righthand side you have \(+1\).
The two don't cancel out.

The correct equation is \(x^2-x-2=0\) or \((x+1)(x-2)=0\), which has two solutions, \(x=-1\) and \(x=2.\)
User avatar
dandarth1
Joined: 23 Aug 2012
Last visit: 29 Apr 2013
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 7
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mydreammba
Bunuel
GyanOne
Using (1), X^2 = X
=> X can be 0 or 1 [not sufficient]

Using (2), X+3 is a primer number
=> X can be -1,0,2,........ [not sufficient]

Combining (1) and (2), X is 0 [sufficient]

(C) it is.

I understand that x can be 0 or 1 in the first statement. However, I'm just wondering algebraically why you couldn't cancel out (x+1) in the equation (x+1)(x-1)=x+1 ? There must be some rule broken if you do, because it will give you a definite solution, which is wrong. Any thoughts?

Never reduce equation by variable (or expression with variable), if you are not certain that variable (or expression with variable) doesn't equal to zero. We can not divide by zero.

So, if you divide (reduce) \(x^2=x\) by \(x\), you assume, with no ground for it, that \(x\) does not equal to zero thus exclude a possible solution.

Hope it's clear.

Hi Bunnel,

How will x=0 satisfy in the 1st equation the possible values for 1st statement are -1 and 2....so not sufficient

statement 2

From statement 2 the possible values are -1, 2 0 .....so not sufficient

Even after combining we have 2 values satisfying the above statements i.e -1 and 2 so Not sufficient

x=0 won't satisfy the first equation. if ur referring to the rule to not divide by zero that bunuel just mentioned, it applies to the whole expression (x+1) in this problem. you cant divide by (x+1) because it could equal zero, and it does when x=-1...x=0 does not satisfy the equation, so u are correct

Archived Topic
Hi there,
Archived GMAT Club Tests question - no more replies possible.
Where to now? Try our up-to-date Free Adaptive GMAT Club Tests for the latest questions.
Still interested? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for better discussion and related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderator:
Math Expert
109994 posts