Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 May 2013, 10:12
Customize  |  Hide

Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2010
Posts: 258
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 65

GMAT Tests User
Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been [#permalink] New post 28 Oct 2010, 21:33
00:00

Question Stats:

77% (01:50) correct 22% (00:51) wrong based on 0 sessions
Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been put into orbit around the Earth, and the chances of a collision involving such material increase greatly as the amount of both space debris and satellites continue to rise.

(A) as the amount of both space debris and satellites continue to rise

(B) as the rise continues in both the amount of satellites and space debris

(C) as the amount of space debris and the number of satellites continue to rise

(D) with the continually increasing amount of space debris and the number of satellites

(E) with the amount of space debris continuing to increase along with the number of satellites
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Consider KUDOS if my post was helpful. :-D

My Debrief: 750-q49v42-105591.html#p825487


Last edited by scheol79 on 29 Oct 2010, 00:28, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 03 Mar 2010
Posts: 41
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 1

Re: Diction; Rhetorical construction [#permalink] New post 29 Oct 2010, 00:09
I pick C
"as" sounds better than "with" so D, E out
debris is non-countable while satellite is countable
_________________

Hardworkingly, you like my post, so kudos me.

Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2009
Posts: 57
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 15

Re: Diction; Rhetorical construction [#permalink] New post 29 Oct 2010, 00:17
(A) as the amount of both space debris and satellites continue to rise
amount refers to a quantity that is uncountable. Whereas satellites are countable. hence Incorrect.

(B) as the rise continues in both the amount of satellites and space debris
same as A. Satellites are countable. Also rise sounds better as a verb than as a Subject in this sentence.

(C) as the amount of space debris and the number of satellites continue to rise

As X & Y continue to rise. S+V agree. Also number refers correctly to satellites. hence Right answer.


(D) with the continually increasing amount of space debris and the number of satellites
Wordy. Ambiguity in the use of Increase instead of rise. Such prefers the use of 'as' instead of 'with'.

(E) with the amount of space debris continuing to increase along with the number of satellites
Wordy and redundant. Such prefers the use of 'as' instead of 'with'.
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 185
Schools: MBA, Thunderbird School of Global Management / BA, Wesleyan University
Followers: 64

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 7

Re: Diction; Rhetorical construction [#permalink] New post 29 Oct 2010, 08:30
You both nailed this problem.

It's critical to understand not only the grammar behind the GMAT, but also the way the test works. As soon as you see "the number" or "less than" or "fewer" in an underlined section of SC, chances are you're going to have to think through countable and uncountable nouns. Be on the look out for that issue.
_________________


Brett Beach-Kimball | Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 177
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 39

Re: Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been [#permalink] New post 26 Sep 2012, 00:27
Answers A and B are incorrect. "Satellites" are countable. Therefore, it is incorrect to say "the amount of satellites."
Answer C is correct.
Answers D and E are much longer and redundant in comparison to answer C. Also they use "with" instead of "as", which is less favored in the GMAT. Moreover, answer E changes the intended meaning because of the use of "along with" instead of "and." The original sentence suggests that the number of satellites and the amount of space debris continue to rise and that these are two separate problems. Answer E states that the amount of debris is correlated with the number of satellites.
_________________

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, I kinda need some =)

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 456
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 39

GMAT Tests User
Re: Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been [#permalink] New post 20 Dec 2012, 06:05
pls, explain fully why D is wrong. I think D is wrong because of meaning problem.

"with phrase" can modify noun a a clause. why "with phrase " is wrong in D.
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1083
Followers: 510

Kudos [?]: 1058 [0], given: 131

Re: Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been [#permalink] New post 20 Dec 2012, 07:57
thangvietnam wrote:
pls, explain fully why D is wrong. I think D is wrong because of meaning problem.

"with phrase" can modify noun a a clause. why "with phrase " is wrong in D.


Hi there,

Choice D: with the continually increasing amount of space debris and the number of satellites
Notice the parallel list in this sentence – chances increase greatly with
a. The continually increasing amount of space debris
b. The number of satellites.
This is not the intended meaning of the sentence. Per the sentence both are increasing and this choice fails to communicate that.

Hope this helps. :)
Thanks.
Shraddha
_________________

Free trial:Click here to start free trial (100+ free practice questions)
Free Session (May 25): : Learn how to master Sentence Correction. Click here to attend.
ImageImageImageImage

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 456
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 39

GMAT Tests User
Re: Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been [#permalink] New post 30 Dec 2012, 01:05
in c, " as" shows the simultaneousness of 2 actions, the intended meaning

in D, "with phrase" shows the context of the main clause and is distorted meaning.

I learn english when they study gmat

with they studying gmat, I learn english.

the second sentence is correct though "with" refers to no noun in the main clause.

in the context that thay study gmat, I study english. the first sentence has different meaning.

If choice D stand alone it is correct, but if C and D stand together and C is closer to the meaning of the original sentence, C is correct and D is considered distorted.

is my thinking correct? pls comment
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jun 2012
Posts: 413
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 194 [0], given: 171

CAT Tests
Re: Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been [#permalink] New post 30 Dec 2012, 02:47
I think intended meaning here is to give the reasoning for certain prediction using the conjunction "As". The use of "with" here gives impression that given events are the independent events that are occurring simultaneously, and hence fails to establish the causal relationship. Use of "as" is more appropriate here.

Choice (C) depicts the required reasoning and establishes the relationship between two events:
(cause) As the amount of space debris and the number of satellites continue to rise -> (effect) the chances of a collision involving such material increase greatly.

PS: Grammatically "with" can only act as a Preposition. It cannot be used as a conjunction.
_________________

Thanks,
PraPon

VOTE: vote-best-gmat-practice-tests-excluding-gmatprep-144859.html
Tough RCs: Passage1 | Passage2 | Passage3 | Passage4 | Passage5 | Passage6 | Passage7

Re: Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been   [#permalink] 30 Dec 2012, 02:47
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Two modes of argumentation have been used on behalf of serf87 7 05 Nov 2007, 03:27
Popular new posts Two giant identical poles have been planted in the ground. mohan514 11 08 Sep 2011, 18:40
New posts EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC When n liters of fuel was added to a tank that was already naveenhv 4 20 Apr 2012, 06:55
New posts In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central SOURH7WK 5 17 Aug 2012, 19:56
New posts 2 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been metallicafan 6 10 Sep 2012, 10:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.