Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 18:03 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 18:03

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 May 2009
Posts: 104
Own Kudos [?]: 685 [2]
Given Kudos: 2
Concentration: Finance
GMAT Date: 12-16-2011
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Posts: 144
Own Kudos [?]: 1484 [11]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: St. Louis, MO
Schools:Cornell (Bach. of Sci.), UCLA Anderson (MBA)
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 May 2009
Posts: 104
Own Kudos [?]: 685 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Concentration: Finance
GMAT Date: 12-16-2011
Send PM
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Posts: 144
Own Kudos [?]: 1484 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: St. Louis, MO
Schools:Cornell (Bach. of Sci.), UCLA Anderson (MBA)
Send PM
Re: Negate Test [#permalink]
Correct, it only applies to Assumption CR. The same thinking, but not the test itself, could be applied a bit to Weaken the Conclusion questions, on which the correct answer sometimes is the explicit negation of an assumption.

I don't use the test right away, but I don't think it would wrong to do so necessarily. I tend to read the argument and anticipate the needed Assumption, based on whether there is a logic gap, weak premise, etc. For me, that is faster. Only if debating between a couple decent-sounding answers do I use the negation test to decide.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Status:Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Posts: 470
Own Kudos [?]: 2377 [0]
Given Kudos: 36
Location: Singapore
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: Chicago Booth - Class of 2015
Send PM
Re: Negate Test [#permalink]
790 8-) Thats an awesome score Emily !

:-D
Director
Director
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 530
Own Kudos [?]: 523 [0]
Given Kudos: 916
Send PM
Re: Negate Test [#permalink]
The book CRITICAL REASONING BIBLE develops the concept of SUPPORTER ASSUMPTION, and DEFENDER ASSUMPTION.
the application of this concept is not explained clearly. here I want to share with you some application.

Supporter assumption is easy to realize when you read answer choices. However, you can not realize defender assumption when you read answer choices. The only way to realize defender assumption is the negation test. negate each answer choice to find defender assumption. This process will take much more time and defender is normally a hard question.

the lesion is that when you finish reading 5 answer choices and see no assumption, it is defender assumption and you have to use negation test and longer time.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Jan 2014
Posts: 55
Own Kudos [?]: 56 [0]
Given Kudos: 20
Send PM
Negate Test [#permalink]
esledge wrote:
The negation test works on CR Assumption questions. Assumptions basically complete the argument (i.e. when verbalized, they become premises), and therefore they support the conclusion. On GMAT Assumption questions, it is common for several choices to support the argument, and often these choices all “sound good.” The trick is to sort out the truly necessary statement from the merely helpful statements.

Rather than being a supporting statement, the correct Assumption is a statement that’s opposite (negation) would kill the argument.

For example, here’s one from GMATPrep.
Attachment:
CR_18.JPG

Notice the “on which the argument depends” language, not simply “what helps the argument?”

If we mistakenly look for answers that support, we might think the following:
(A) Supports: Large tranquilizer dose. Possible overdose? This does seem to indicate that the tranquilizer is a problem.
(B) Supports: If uncollared females have increasing fertility, then what else would explain the reduced fertility of the tranquilized/collared females? It would have to be the tranquilizer, the only other difference between the two groups.
(C) Supports: Rules out other factors involved in the tranquilizing, and allows us to conclude the reduced fertility is due to a substance in the tranquilizer.
(D) Supports (maybe): At least it suggests that female rhinos are tranquilized more frequently than males, and would be affected more by whatever substance is in the tranquilizer.
(E) Neutral: Just a fact about the tranquilizer.

You can see how unproductive this thought process is! The choices start to sound similar, and you could talk yourself into almost any one.

In contrast, if we negate each statement to see the effect on the conclusion (“some substance in the tranquilizer inhibits fertility”), the correct answer stands out. I’ve put the negated idea/word(s) in caps.

(A) The tranquilizer dose is NOT large. No effect on the conclusion.
(B) The fertility rate of uncollared female rhinos has been STEADY or DECLINING. No effect on the conclusion.
(C) The stress of being tranquilized and handled DOES have a negative effect on fertility. This kills the conclusion that some substance in the tranquilizer is to blame.
(D) Male rhinos lose their collars AS FREQUENTLY as females. No effect on the conclusion.
(E) The tranquilizer used on the rhinos is DIFFERENT than that used on other large mammals. No effect on the conclusion.

The correct answer is C.




Hi Emily,
Good day.. I have a clarification here.. I understand that it's the the tranquilizers a reason for lowering fertility from C.. But doesn't B breaks the conclusion on negating as well? Because on negating B, we get that B) The fertility rate of uncollared female rhinos is declined. Which means that even the untranquilized ones are also getting negative effect on fertility. So tranqilizers are not the reason. There must be some other... Doesn't this pulls down the conclusion that darts are responsible for fertility decline? Please. Help...

Originally posted by sheolokesh on 13 Mar 2015, 19:45.
Last edited by sheolokesh on 14 Mar 2015, 10:16, edited 1 time in total.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Dec 2013
Posts: 164
Own Kudos [?]: 125 [0]
Given Kudos: 113
Send PM
Re: Negate Test [#permalink]
Hi Esledge,

I like your thought process for the below question. I like the negate the statement approach.

I am struggling with one bit... where exactly you negate a sentence for example...

'Sam goes to university in a bus along the riverside'

How do we negate the above sentence..

1. Sam does not go to uni

or

2. Sam does not go in a bus to Uni.

or

3. sam's bus does not go along rivver.


With many other negations coming up, I find it a bit hard to crack some CR question.

Please could you help me with negation approach.

esledge wrote:
The negation test works on CR Assumption questions. Assumptions basically complete the argument (i.e. when verbalized, they become premises), and therefore they support the conclusion. On GMAT Assumption questions, it is common for several choices to support the argument, and often these choices all “sound good.” The trick is to sort out the truly necessary statement from the merely helpful statements.

Rather than being a supporting statement, the correct Assumption is a statement that’s opposite (negation) would kill the argument.

For example, here’s one from GMATPrep.
Attachment:
CR_18.JPG

Notice the “on which the argument depends” language, not simply “what helps the argument?”

If we mistakenly look for answers that support, we might think the following:
(A) Supports: Large tranquilizer dose. Possible overdose? This does seem to indicate that the tranquilizer is a problem.
(B) Supports: If uncollared females have increasing fertility, then what else would explain the reduced fertility of the tranquilized/collared females? It would have to be the tranquilizer, the only other difference between the two groups.
(C) Supports: Rules out other factors involved in the tranquilizing, and allows us to conclude the reduced fertility is due to a substance in the tranquilizer.
(D) Supports (maybe): At least it suggests that female rhinos are tranquilized more frequently than males, and would be affected more by whatever substance is in the tranquilizer.
(E) Neutral: Just a fact about the tranquilizer.

You can see how unproductive this thought process is! The choices start to sound similar, and you could talk yourself into almost any one.

In contrast, if we negate each statement to see the effect on the conclusion (“some substance in the tranquilizer inhibits fertility”), the correct answer stands out. I’ve put the negated idea/word(s) in caps.

(A) The tranquilizer dose is NOT large. No effect on the conclusion.
(B) The fertility rate of uncollared female rhinos has been STEADY or DECLINING. No effect on the conclusion.
(C) The stress of being tranquilized and handled DOES have a negative effect on fertility. This kills the conclusion that some substance in the tranquilizer is to blame.
(D) Male rhinos lose their collars AS FREQUENTLY as females. No effect on the conclusion.
(E) The tranquilizer used on the rhinos is DIFFERENT than that used on other large mammals. No effect on the conclusion.

The correct answer is C.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17226
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Negate Test [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Negate Test [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6923 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13961 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne