One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) - Page 2
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 21 Jan 2017, 22:33

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 118
Location: Bangalore, India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 77 [13] , given: 0

One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Oct 2005, 04:44
13
KUDOS
56
This post was
BOOKMARKED
One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique, commonly called "benchmarking", permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather that against competitors EXCEPT:

(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to fous on practices that the manager making the comparisions already employs
(B) Getting "inside" information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult
(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have cpmparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products of markets
Manager
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 116
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 115 [2] , given: 1

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2010, 05:55
2
KUDOS
Need to find an option where it is not discussing about the rival companies / practices of other companies in the market, the option falling outside the scope of the argument :

(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the comparisons already employs.
Discusses disadvantage of benchmarking against competitors.
(B) Getting “inside” information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult.
Discusses rival company and difficulty of benchmarking with competitors.
(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors.
Discuss advantage of benchmarking with other than competitors.
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.
Discuss advantage of benchmarking with other than competitors.
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products of markets.
Discuss about market and product- out of scope of the original argument
Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 997
Location: Singapore
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 747 [0], given: 36

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2010, 06:10
P1 : To judge the performance is to compare it with other companies
P2 : benchmarking allowws manager to adopt good practices

Which of the following is NOT a valid reason to benchmark against a non competitor?

(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the special circumstances of their products of markets. >>> Odd one. Hence the answer. The "special circumstance" makes the benefits of copying non portable.
_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Manager
Joined: 08 Sep 2010
Posts: 232
Location: India
WE 1: 6 Year, Telecom(GSM)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 251 [0], given: 21

One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2010, 02:07
One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique,
commonly called “benchmarking,” permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices
and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.
Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against
companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:
(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the
(B) Getting “inside” information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult.
(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only
benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors.
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the
special circumstances of their products or markets.

OA will be given tomorrow.

If u like the question consider giving KUDOS

Last edited by ankitranjan on 10 Oct 2010, 02:40, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Status: Time to step up the tempo
Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 408
Location: Milky way
Schools: ISB, Tepper - CMU, Chicago Booth, LSB
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 50

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2010, 03:25
ankitranjan wrote:
One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique,
commonly called “benchmarking,” permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices
and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.
Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against
companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:
(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the
(B) Getting “inside” information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult.
(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only
benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors.
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the
special circumstances of their products or markets.

OA will be given tomorrow.

If u like the question consider giving KUDOS

To determine:
Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against
companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:

can be rephrased as

"Any valid reason for benchmarking with non-competitors rather than competitors EXCEPT" --

which again can be rephrased to remove EXCEPT as --

"Any valid reason for benchmarking against competitors rather than non-competitors"

We are asked to find out a reason that is NOT a valid reason for benchmarking against competitors rather than non-competitors.

Thus after simplifying the "to find" part of the question we can see that option A is the best choice.

Reason for eliminating other options.

B -- One more reason to benchmark against non-competitors. Incorrect.
C -- Incorrect. One more reason to benchmark against non-competitors. Again this option would be enticing to those who might not have clearly grasped the double negative in the argument.
D -- Incorrect. Out of their own industry, there would be lot of non-competitors than competitors.
E -- Out of scope.

Actually after solving the question, I was able to recollect that in the EXCEPT and LEAST CR question types there would be ONLY ONE correct option unlike the strengthen or weaken type questions. Hence we could eliminate option B and C since both these options are suggesting to benchmark against non-competitors.
_________________

Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog

Manager
Joined: 17 Apr 2010
Posts: 108
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 12

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2010, 10:07
OA plz
Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 170
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2010, 11:58
Intern
Joined: 25 Sep 2010
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2010, 17:19
E for me.
Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1712
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 97

Kudos [?]: 915 [0], given: 109

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2010, 13:49
+1 E
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2010
Posts: 260
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 554 [0], given: 11

One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Dec 2010, 16:59
One way to judge the performance of a company is
to compare it with other companies. This technique,
commonly called "benchmarking," permits the manager
of a company to discover better industrial practices
and can provide a justification for the adoption of
good practices.

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for
benchmarking the performance of a company
against companies with which it is not in competi-
tion rather than against competitors EXCEPT:
(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely
to focus on practices that the manager making
(B) Getting "inside" information about the unique
practices of competitors is particularly difficult.
(C) Since companies that compete with each other are
likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only
benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to
reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors.
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new
ideas that they find outside their own industry.
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to
the special circumstances of their products of markets.

I am having some trouble with 'except' questions, please can someone provide some pointers in dealing with such questions efficiently. thanks.
_________________

Gmat: everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ajit

Manhattan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 185
Schools: MBA, Thunderbird School of Global Management / BA, Wesleyan University
Followers: 96

Kudos [?]: 211 [2] , given: 7

Re: One way to judge the performance of a company [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Dec 2010, 19:25
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
ajit257,

In general, I'd suggest the following for EXCEPT questions:

Before you get to the answer choices, be explicit with yourself about what you expect to see in the answer choices and rephrase the question to make that clear to yourself.

For example, if the question is: "All of the following, if true, weaken the conclusion EXCEPT" then you'll expect to see 4 answer choices that weaken the conclusion and 1 that either has no bearing at all or in fact strengthens the conclusion. Tell yourself: "I'm looking for something that strengthens the conclusion or is totally irrelevant."

If the question is similar to yours posted below, you'd expect to see four answer choices that are completely logical and valid rationale for benchmarking against non-competitors and one that either provides justification for benchmarking against competitors or is irrelevant. Tell yourself: "I'm looking for an answer that would make me want to benchmark my performance against competitors or is totally irrelevant to the issue."

If you can rephrase the question to be explicit, you'll be much less likely to fall for trap answers.

Brett
_________________

Brett Beach-Kimball | Manhattan GMAT Instructor

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Current Student
Status: Up again.
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 541
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V42
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 410 [0], given: 75

Re: One way to judge the performance of a company [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Dec 2010, 20:30
All option choices except E clearly give reasons for 2 things:(i) Why there shouldn't be benchmarking against competitors and (ii) Why there should be benchmarking against non competitors..

E neither talks about benchmarking nor about competitors/ non competitors and so does not have any impact whatsoever on the argument. Hence E is the best answer choice.

Often, in an "except" question, the correct answer choice does not have any impact on the argument. Its just a cold statement of facts, as it is in this case.
_________________

My GMAT debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/from-620-to-710-my-gmat-journey-114437.html

Intern
Joined: 18 Nov 2010
Posts: 42
Location: Richmond VA
Schools: ISB, IIMA (PGPX), IIMB (EMBA) & IIMC..
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 24

Re: One way to judge the performance of a company [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Dec 2010, 05:44
gmatpapa wrote:
All option choices except E clearly give reasons for 2 things:(i) Why there shouldn't be benchmarking against competitors and (ii) Why there should be benchmarking against non competitors..

E neither talks about benchmarking nor about competitors/ non competitors and so does not have any impact whatsoever on the argument. Hence E is the best answer choice.

Often, in an "except" question, the correct answer choice does not have any impact on the argument. Its just a cold statement of facts, as it is in this case.

well said. IMO E. Question was bit twisting..but straight E...I wud say.
Intern
Joined: 18 Nov 2010
Posts: 42
Location: Richmond VA
Schools: ISB, IIMA (PGPX), IIMB (EMBA) & IIMC..
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 24

### Show Tags

21 Dec 2010, 10:00
ankitranjan wrote:
One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique,
commonly called “benchmarking,” permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial practices
and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.
Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against
companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:
(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the
(B) Getting “inside” information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult.
(C) Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency, only
benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in beating competitors.
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take advantage of the
special circumstances of their products or markets.

OA will be given tomorrow.

If u like the question consider giving KUDOS

IMO E.

This is from OG11. All choices except E talk the adv of gathering info about non-competing companies. So straight E....
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Oct 2010
Posts: 410
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 115

Another one: One way to judge the performance of a company [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2011, 11:53
Another one:

One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique,
commonly called “benchmarking,” permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial
practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against
companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:

(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the
(B) Getting “inside” information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult
(C)Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency,
only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in
beating competitors.
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take
advantage of the special circumstances of their products or markets
Manager
Joined: 27 Oct 2010
Posts: 189
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [1] , given: 20

### Show Tags

10 Feb 2011, 12:59
1
KUDOS
E. If the company takes advantage of the special circumstances, then benchmarking won't help.
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Oct 2010
Posts: 410
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 115

### Show Tags

12 Feb 2011, 13:39
intcan wrote:
E. If the company takes advantage of the special circumstances, then benchmarking won't help.

got it, thanks
Manager
Joined: 19 Nov 2010
Posts: 91
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 159 [0], given: 9

### Show Tags

16 Feb 2011, 13:28
E does not relate to benchmarking or the advantage/disadvantage of benchmarking against the competitor or non-competitor. It's completely irrevelent.
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Oct 2010
Posts: 410
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 115

### Show Tags

16 Feb 2011, 18:20
bellcurve wrote:
E does not relate to benchmarking or the advantage/disadvantage of benchmarking against the competitor or non-competitor. It's completely irrevelent.
Are you saying that the OA is wrong? what is the correct answer in your opinion?
Current Student
Status: Up again.
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 541
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V42
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 410 [0], given: 75

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2011, 07:27
heygirl wrote:
Another one:

One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare it with other companies. This technique,
commonly called “benchmarking,” permits the manager of a company to discover better industrial
practices and can provide a justification for the adoption of good practices.

Any of the following, if true, is a valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against
companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors EXCEPT:

(A) Comparisons with competitors are most likely to focus on practices that the manager making the
(B) Getting “inside” information about the unique practices of competitors is particularly difficult
(C)Since companies that compete with each other are likely to have comparable levels of efficiency,
only benchmarking against noncompetitors is likely to reveal practices that would aid in
beating competitors.
(D) Managers are generally more receptive to new ideas that they find outside their own industry.
(E) Much of the success of good companies is due to their adoption of practices that take
advantage of the special circumstances of their products or markets

A. Valid. It could broaden the manager's perspective.
B. Valid.
C. Valid.
D. Valid
E. Only this answer choice doesn't differentiate between competitors and non competitors and talks about special circumstances. Clearly, this statement does not give any valid reason for benchmarking the performance of a company against companies with which it is not in competition rather than against competitors.

_________________

My GMAT debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/from-620-to-710-my-gmat-journey-114437.html

Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 649
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 219 [0], given: 51

Re: One way to judge the performance of a company [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2011, 08:31
kimball thanks for the suggestion. paraphrasing the expectation definitely helps in Except question, otherwise under time pressure such questions can easily go wrong.

i chose E but it took me 3 minutes +
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Re: One way to judge the performance of a company   [#permalink] 27 Apr 2011, 08:31

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4    Next  [ 71 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare 1 25 Apr 2013, 05:04
One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare 0 21 Dec 2010, 10:00
One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare 0 04 Sep 2010, 06:10
One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare 0 25 Oct 2011, 20:43
One way to judge the performance of a company is to compare 0 13 Mar 2008, 23:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by