Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 11:53 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 11:53

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2009
Posts: 146
Own Kudos [?]: 723 [17]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Posts: 29
Own Kudos [?]: 157 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Healthcare
GMAT 1: 600 Q49 V25
GMAT 2: 650 Q49 V32
GPA: 3.5
WE:Pharmaceuticals (Consulting)
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 125
Own Kudos [?]: 195 [2]
Given Kudos: 12
Concentration: General Management, Sustainability
WE:Consulting (Computer Software)
Send PM
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Apr 2010
Posts: 19
Own Kudos [?]: 72 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of labor-saving techn [#permalink]
The stimulus,however,talks about numbers and averages and instinctively you think in terms of number and percentages chapter in Powerscore, the answer choices seems pretty easy and ONLY E is left out as every other AC seems out of scope.
Thanks,
-V
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Status:2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Posts: 767
Own Kudos [?]: 3947 [0]
Given Kudos: 109
Location: Peru
Concentration: Finance, SMEs, Developing countries, Public sector and non profit organizations
Schools:Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
GPA: 4.0
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Send PM
Re: Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of labor-saving techn [#permalink]
+1 E

Remember that Must be true questions don't accept new information in the answer choices.
The correct answer must be an inference based on the estimulus.
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2163
Own Kudos [?]: 1180 [1]
Given Kudos: 236
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE:General Management (Transportation)
Send PM
Re: Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of labor-saving techn [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
angel2009 wrote:
Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of labor-saving technologies has greatly reduced the average amount of time a worker needs to produce a given output, potentially both reducing the number of hours each worker works each week and increasing workers’ leisure time correspondingly. The average amount of leisure time per worker, however, has increased at only half the rate at which the average hourly output per worker has grown.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following is most strongly supported by them?

(A) Workers on average spend more money on leisure activities today than they did twenty-five years ago.
(B) Labor-saving technologies have created fewer jobs than they have eliminated.
(C) The percentage of the population that is in the work force has grown over the past twenty-five years.
(D) The average hourly output per worker has not risen as much as had been anticipated when modern labor-saving technologies were first introduced.
(E) Twenty-five years ago the average weekly output per worker was less than it is today.


only E makes sense.
A - out of scope
B - not discussed so no
C - not discussed so no
D - what was anticipated is out of scope.
E - last sentence says that the average hourly output per worker has grown.

E it is.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Posts: 484
Own Kudos [?]: 2335 [2]
Given Kudos: 36
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
Send PM
Re: Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of labor-saving techn [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Answer is E

25 YEARS AGO :-Total hours available to a worker each week = 7 Days X 24 Hours = 168 Hours
Off course the worker will not work for all 24 hours a day. He would finish his job and relax. Those Relaxing hours are called Leisure hours.
Mathematically speaking :- Total hours in a week (Work hours in a week + Leisure hours in a week)
Lets assume 25 YEARS AGO worker works all 7 days for 10 hours a day (70 hours per week) and his rate was 10 toys an hour==> 10 toys per hour X 70 hours a week = 700 toys per week
Total weekly hours available= 168 hours
His weekly work hours = 70 hours
Weekly leisure time available to worker = (168-70)= 98 Hours
25 years ago Weekly output ===> 700 toys per week.

Now statements tells us that TODAY weekly output has grown by X amount But leisure time has grown by only X/2 amount.
Since the weekly production has definitely increased, lets assume it has increased 10 times. (it can be 2 times, 200 times, 1.8 times.. How many times it doesn't matter but the sure thing is that "hourly" output has increased and by extension the "weekly" output has also increased) so now the worker makes 10 times of 700 toys = 10 X 700==> 7000 toys
But his leisure time has increased only half the original leisure time= 98 hours + half of 98 hours= 98+49=147 hours (This statement is not totally useless by the way, as it will be used to calculate TODAYS working hours )

Today Worker works 168-147=21 hours .. WHATTTTT !! Today the worker works only 21 hours in a whole week and still produces 7000 toys a week
His weekly Production ===> 7000 TOYS per week

So , we can see that 25 years ago a worker produced 700 toys and today he produces 7000 toys. It means 25 years ago his weekly production was less compared to today.

What answer choice is reconfirming the math. It's E

(E) Twenty-five years ago the average weekly output per worker was less than it is today.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Status:You have to have the darkness for the dawn to come
Posts: 227
Own Kudos [?]: 660 [0]
Given Kudos: 162
Daboo: Sonu
GMAT 1: 590 Q49 V20
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V38
Send PM
Re: Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of labor-saving techn [#permalink]
(E) Twenty-five years ago the average weekly output per worker was less than it is today.
how E is the answer?
it might be that workers are working for longer hours twenty five years ago, so may be output worker may be equal to or larger 25 years ago.
CEO
CEO
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Posts: 2555
Own Kudos [?]: 1813 [0]
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of labor-saving techn [#permalink]
Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of labor-saving technologies has greatly reduced the average amount of time a worker needs to produce a given output, potentially both reducing the number of hours each worker works each week and increasing workers’ leisure time correspondingly. The average amount of leisure time per worker, however, has increased at only half the rate at which the average hourly output per worker has grown.

If the statements above are true, which one of the following is most strongly supported by them?


(A) Workers on average spend more money on leisure activities today than they did twenty-five years ago.

(B) Labor-saving technologies have created fewer jobs than they have eliminated.

(C) The percentage of the population that is in the work force has grown over the past twenty-five years.

(D) The average hourly output per worker has not risen as much as had been anticipated when modern labor-saving technologies were first introduced.

(E) Twenty-five years ago the average weekly output per worker was less than it is today.

POE leads to E only. Rest all are irrelevant.

Answer E.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Aug 2021
Posts: 374
Own Kudos [?]: 35 [0]
Given Kudos: 226
Send PM
Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of labor-saving techn [#permalink]
daboo343 wrote:
(E) Twenty-five years ago the average weekly output per worker was less than it is today.
how E is the answer?
it might be that workers are working for longer hours twenty five years ago, so may be output worker may be equal to or larger 25 years ago.


It is the case I think of too, can anybody elaborate?
Also, let's say the counterexample as below, which shows 25yrs ago the weekly output per worker was MORE than it is today, so choice E is NOT always TRUE:


-------------------------25 Years Ago-----------Today -----------Rate of Growth

Leisure Time------------16 Hrs/Day-----------20 Hrs/Day------------25%

Work Time---------------8 Hrs/Day------------4 Hrs/Day

Productivity/------------10 Units/Hr-----------15 Units/Hr -----------50%
Hourly Output

Total Output-------------80 Units/Day---------60 Units/Day
GMAT Club Bot
Over the past twenty-five years the introduction of labor-saving techn [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne