Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Ready to ace the GMAT and unlock your dream MBA program? Look no further! In this comprehensive video, we cover everything you need to know – from mindset shifts to powerful strategies and a step-by-step monthly plan.
Prepare with upto 44% off on our plans and score 99th %ile on GMAT Focus. Take advantage of the sale & get access to a personalized study plan, 100+ video lessons, 5 mocks & a dedicated mentor at prices starting $149. Hurry up!
earn how to utilize unique factors about your profile to stand out in the MBA application. Join Jen with ARINGO as she dives into the different parts of the application where you can share your individuality in a stacked applicant pool.
Join us for a GMAT Marathon on May the 4th, where the power of your preparation will be as strong as the Force! Just like Jedi Masters hone their skills, we'll be sharpening our minds for the GMAT challenges ahead.
In this webinar, Rajat Sadana, GMAT Club’s #1 rated expert will help you create a personalized study plan so that each one of you can visualize your journey to a top GMAT Focus Score.
We know Strengthen and Weaken questions account for more than 50% of the CR questions on the GMAT. With CR becoming even more important on GMAT Focus, it's time you strengthen your weaknesses with an approach that improves your solving time and accuracy!
With brand new features like:AI-driven Planner tool, 850+ data Insights practice questions and GMAT Focus Edition Adaptive mock tests with ESR+ analysis and personal mentor support, our course is the most comprehensive course for GMAT Focus Edition.
Charlotte Parkins Gilman, a late nineteenth-century
[#permalink]
11 Oct 2005, 11:16
Show timer
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct
0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 2
sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
Charlotte Parkins Gilman, a late nineteenth-century feminist, called for urban apartment houses including child-care facilities and clustered suburban houses including communal eating and social facilities.
(A) including child-care facilities and clustered suburban houses including communal eating and social facilities
(B) that included child-care facilities, and for clustered suburban houses to include communal eating and social facilities
(C) with child-care facilities included and for clustered suburban houses to include communal eating and social facilities
(D) that included child-care facilities and for clustered suburban houses with communal eating and social facilities
(E) to include child-care facilities and for clustered suburban houses with communal eating and social facilities included
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Re: Charlotte Parkins Gilman, a late nineteenth-century
[#permalink]
11 Oct 2005, 14:06
A is out. the meaning doesn't make any sense.
B can be left out for the same reason. To call suburban houses to include....? My English is crap but good enough to know that a house can not do any anction.
C is out for the same reason that B has been left out. The same for D.
Re: Charlotte Parkins Gilman, a late nineteenth-century
[#permalink]
11 Oct 2005, 14:54
Go with D.
Question is about parallelism. Reading the original sentence, we notice that we need to begin the underlined portion with "that" to identify the houses. You can immediately cross out all the choice except B and D.
Between B and D, I selected D because B contains "to include" which indicates a tense change.
macca wrote:
Charlotte Parkins Gilman, a late nineteenth-century feminist, called for urban apartment houses including child-care facilities and clustered suburban houses including communal eating and social facilities.
(A) including child-care facilities and clustered suburban houses including communal eating and social facilities (B) that included child-care facilities, and for clustered suburban houses to include communal eating and social facilities (C) with child-care facilities included and for clustered suburban houses to include communal eating and social facilities (D) that included child-care facilities and for clustered suburban houses with communal eating and social facilities (E) to include child-care facilities and for clustered suburban houses with communal eating and social facilities included
Re: Charlotte Parkins Gilman, a late nineteenth-century
[#permalink]
24 Oct 2005, 16:07
The answer should be B.
Option D changes the meaning of the original sentance by using "with". The original sentance uses "including" and therefore we must use "to include" to preserve the meaning.
Re: Charlotte Parkins Gilman, a late nineteenth-century
[#permalink]
24 Oct 2005, 20:19
Am I the only one who vote for (A)?
I know I'm always wrong when I go against the flow, but still I can't help leaning toward (A).
She is calling for two things;
- urban apartment houses with(=including) child-care facilities
- clustered suburban houses with(=including) communal eating and social facilities
Re: Charlotte Parkins Gilman, a late nineteenth-century
[#permalink]
25 Oct 2005, 04:02
My pick is D!
This shows that PNP rule - the preposition noun participle - which is not acceptable structure as per standard engligh grammar. That means we can rule out C and E.
As the sentence tests parallelism the preferred structure is to have 'for' repeated before clustered houses - so we can rule out A based on this.
So its between B and D - B does not sound right what with - called for....to include.
SO i pick D!
Re: Charlotte Parkins Gilman, a late nineteenth-century
[#permalink]
25 Oct 2005, 04:19
macca wrote:
Charlotte Parkins Gilman, a late nineteenth-century feminist, called for urban apartment houses including child-care facilities and clustered suburban houses including communal eating and social facilities.
(A) including child-care facilities and clustered suburban houses including communal eating and social facilities (B) that included child-care facilities, and for clustered suburban houses to include communal eating and social facilities (C) with child-care facilities included and for clustered suburban houses to include communal eating and social facilities (D) that included child-care facilities and for clustered suburban houses with communal eating and social facilities (E) to include child-care facilities and for clustered suburban houses with communal eating and social facilities included
we need "for" after and for parallelism.
A - Not parallel - "for" not present after "and".
B - to include changes tense between two parallel statements. Not correct.
C - Tense change. Not correct.
E - Tense change. Not correct.
Re: Charlotte Parkins Gilman, a late nineteenth-century
[#permalink]
25 Oct 2005, 06:16
syamee_u wrote:
macca wrote:
Charlotte Parkins Gilman, a late nineteenth-century feminist, called for urban apartment houses including child-care facilities and clustered suburban houses including communal eating and social facilities.
(A) including child-care facilities and clustered suburban houses including communal eating and social facilities (B) that included child-care facilities, and for clustered suburban houses to include communal eating and social facilities (C) with child-care facilities included and for clustered suburban houses to include communal eating and social facilities (D) that included child-care facilities and for clustered suburban houses with communal eating and social facilities (E) to include child-care facilities and for clustered suburban houses with communal eating and social facilities included
we need "for" after and for parallelism. A - Not parallel - "for" not present after "and". B - to include changes tense between two parallel statements. Not correct. C - Tense change. Not correct. E - Tense change. Not correct.
My choice - D.
B/t what is OA?
Why should there be two "for"s ?
I think "call for X and Y" is better than "call for X and for Y"...
Re: Charlotte Parkins Gilman, a late nineteenth-century
[#permalink]
25 Oct 2005, 06:51
gamjatang wrote:
syamee_u wrote:
macca wrote:
Charlotte Parkins Gilman, a late nineteenth-century feminist, called for urban apartment houses including child-care facilities and clustered suburban houses including communal eating and social facilities.
(A) including child-care facilities and clustered suburban houses including communal eating and social facilities (B) that included child-care facilities, and for clustered suburban houses to include communal eating and social facilities (C) with child-care facilities included and for clustered suburban houses to include communal eating and social facilities (D) that included child-care facilities and for clustered suburban houses with communal eating and social facilities (E) to include child-care facilities and for clustered suburban houses with communal eating and social facilities included
we need "for" after and for parallelism. A - Not parallel - "for" not present after "and". B - to include changes tense between two parallel statements. Not correct. C - Tense change. Not correct. E - Tense change. Not correct.
My choice - D.
B/t what is OA?
Why should there be two "for"s ?
I think "call for X and Y" is better than "call for X and for Y"...
(But I'm only 3% sure )
This "for" is not redundant coz it makes the parallelism, without the second " for" , one may think that "clustered suburban houses " is a part of "that included ".
Re: Charlotte Parkins Gilman, a late nineteenth-century
[#permalink]
25 Oct 2005, 07:04
macca wrote:
Charlotte Parkins Gilman, a late nineteenth-century feminist, called for urban apartment houses including child-care facilities and clustered suburban houses including communal eating and social facilities.
(A) including child-care facilities and clustered suburban houses including communal eating and social facilities (B) that included child-care facilities, and for clustered suburban houses to include communal eating and social facilities (C) with child-care facilities included and for clustered suburban houses to include communal eating and social facilities (D) that included child-care facilities and for clustered suburban houses with communal eating and social facilities (E) to include child-care facilities and for clustered suburban houses with communal eating and social facilities included
I've got to go with D.
A. "including" is incorrect in this context, it has to be "to include" or "that included"
B. lacks parallelism between "that included" and "to include"
C. lacks parallelism between "included" and "to include"
E. lacks parallelism between "to include" and "included"
Re: Charlotte Parkins Gilman, a late nineteenth-century
[#permalink]
25 Oct 2005, 10:47
[quote="macca"]Charlotte Parkins Gilman, a late nineteenth-century feminist, called for urban apartment houses including child-care facilities and clustered suburban houses including communal eating and social facilities.
(A) including child-care facilities and clustered suburban houses including communal eating and social facilities
The construction is ambiguous. This reads as if he was calling for apartment houses that included both child care facilities and suburban houses.
(B) that included child-care facilities, and for clustered suburban houses to include communal eating and social facilities
that included and to include is not parallel.
(C) with child-care facilities included and for clustered suburban houses to include communal eating and social facilities
Again included and to include is not parallel.
(D) that included child-care facilities and for clustered suburban houses with communal eating and social facilities
This is be best. He calls for A that included something and for B with something else.
(E) to include child-care facilities and for clustered suburban houses with communal eating and social facilities included
Again not parallel.
D
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
gmatclubot
Re: Charlotte Parkins Gilman, a late nineteenth-century [#permalink]