Last visit was: 06 May 2024, 15:22 It is currently 06 May 2024, 15:22

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Jul 2006
Posts: 59
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: NY, NY
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 565
Own Kudos [?]: 176 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Jul 2006
Posts: 59
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: NY, NY
Send PM
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 1490
Own Kudos [?]: 1136 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools:Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
 Q50  V34
Send PM
Re: DS question [#permalink]
microjohn wrote:
even if the line is not coming from the origin?

But its shown that its coming from origin. Question should have stated that line OX where O is the origin. Thats why I hate KAPLAN book. It tricks you on wording rather than concept.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Jul 2006
Posts: 59
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: NY, NY
Send PM
Re: DS question [#permalink]
thanks dahiya. That's what I'm saying. Origin is not specified, and if you look at the line, it actually begins a little above the origin.
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 896
Own Kudos [?]: 593 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: DS question [#permalink]
I know Kaplan sucks.... but IMO we can assume this. Right?
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 418
Own Kudos [?]: 48 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
 Q49  V41
Send PM
Re: DS question [#permalink]
B....

I can see the confusion, I agree the diagram is a little messed up.
Kaplan has ways to go.... :evil:
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 565
Own Kudos [?]: 176 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: DS question [#permalink]
microjohn wrote:
even if the line is not coming from the origin?


your question is valid.

i also supposed that the line originated from the origin, we cannot suppose. so now st. 2 is also not suffcient. 1 and 2 are not suff. answer should be E.

the approach used in kaplan book is flawed..
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Apr 2006
Posts: 35
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: DS question [#permalink]
Professor wrote:
microjohn wrote:
even if the line is not coming from the origin?


your question is valid.

i also supposed that the line originated from the origin, we cannot suppose. so now st. 2 is also not suffcient. 1 and 2 are not suff. answer should be E.

the approach used in kaplan book is flawed..


Professor,

It can be easily inferred that O is the origin since X and Y axis are shown and the point where X and Y axis intersect is the origin. We dont have to suppose anything here. So, IMO the answer is B.
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 565
Own Kudos [?]: 176 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: DS question [#permalink]
nope. you cannot make any supposition. ok, you can make inference but how do you infer that the line is originated from O (0,0)? you have to prove it.

either the question must provide or you should prove that the origin of the line is O (0,0).

this is a bad question at all.

yessuresh wrote:
Professor wrote:
microjohn wrote:
even if the line is not coming from the origin?


your question is valid.

i also supposed that the line originated from the origin, we cannot suppose. so now st. 2 is also not suffcient. 1 and 2 are not suff. answer should be E.

the approach used in kaplan book is flawed..


Professor,

It can be easily inferred that O is the origin since X and Y axis are shown and the point where X and Y axis intersect is the origin. We dont have to suppose anything here. So, IMO the answer is B.
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Posts: 960
Own Kudos [?]: 695 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: Madrid
 Q51  V50
Send PM
Re: DS question [#permalink]
If the line doesn't originate from orgin, then what does angle r refer to? The arrows mean that the horizontal and vertical lines are the x and y axes. Cut us people at Kaplan some slack here, eh? :?
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 565
Own Kudos [?]: 176 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: DS question [#permalink]
kevincan wrote:
If the line doesn't originate from orgin, then what does angle r refer to?


we can have a line passed from x=0 and y>0 with c=d where 0<r<180.
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Posts: 960
Own Kudos [?]: 695 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: Madrid
 Q51  V50
Send PM
Re: DS question [#permalink]
Professor wrote:
kevincan wrote:
If the line doesn't originate from orgin, then what does angle r refer to?


we can have a line passed from x=0 and y>0 with c=d where 0<r<180.


Then r would be the angle between which two line segments?
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 565
Own Kudos [?]: 176 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: DS question [#permalink]
kevincan wrote:
Professor wrote:
kevincan wrote:
If the line doesn't originate from orgin, then what does angle r refer to?


we can have a line passed from x=0 and y>0 with c=d where 0<r<180.


Then r would be the angle between which two line segments?


r would be between y axis and the line that we draw from y axis..
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Posts: 960
Own Kudos [?]: 695 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: Madrid
 Q51  V50
Send PM
Re: DS question [#permalink]
The diagram would have to be a lot more detailed if that were the case! Granted, the drawing could have been more carefully done. It was not Kaplan intention to mislead with it, though.
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 565
Own Kudos [?]: 176 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: DS question [#permalink]
kevincan wrote:
The diagram would have to be a lot more detailed if that were the case! Granted, the drawing could have been more carefully done. It was not Kaplan intention to mislead with it, though.


agreed. 8-)

but kaplan and TPR questions are not properly designed. particularly kaplan's questions are designed to give an impression that their questions are tough and standard but they actually are poorly structured. TPR is also not free from flaws.

however, anybody can get trapped anywhere in gmat questions. cracking the gmat is not an easy job. :evil: :evil: :twisted:
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 69
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: DS question [#permalink]
I agree with majority and OP that this question (with the given answer by Kaplan) is misleading. Everywhere in the prep books it is said that on DS questions that have drawings and graphs you are not supposed to assume that the the graphs/pictures are drawn to scale. But apparently in order to solve this particular question the way Kaplan intended, one have to assume that the line is groing through the origin. I think they should change the wording of the question



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: DS question [#permalink]
Moderators:
Math Expert
93060 posts
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
3137 posts
GMAT Tutor
1904 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne