Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1912:30 PM EST
-01:30 PM EST
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2001:30 PM EST
-02:30 PM IST
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2407:00 PM PST
-08:00 PM PST
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
01 Jan 2022, 21:34
Kudos
Bookmarks
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
52% (02:18) correct
48%
(02:35)
wrong
based on 1032
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Most jurors will be more inclined to reach a verdict favorable to one side if that side’s case is based primarily on eyewitness testimony rather than on physical evidence backed by expert scientific testimony. Surprisingly, studies involving jurors in mock trials have found that this tendency survives even for those jurors who understand that eyewitness testimony is generally less reliable than is physical evidence backed by expert testimony.
Which of the following would, if true, most help to explain the surprising phenomenon described above?
A. Jurors in mock trials usually spend less time deliberating and worrying about reaching the right verdict than do jurors in actual trials.
B. Because expert testimony regarding physical evidence presented at trial is almost invariably given by witnesses testifying for one side or the other, many jurors regard such witnesses as biased.
C. The credibility that a particular juror will assign to a particular eyewitness will be profoundly influenced by personal characteristics of the eyewitness including age, gender, occupation, and appearance.
D. Even jurors who understand that eyewitnesses tend to be less reliable than physical evidence incorrectly believe they are better than the average juror at telling when an eyewitness’s testimony is reliable
E. The more complex the physical evidence presented at trial is, the less it will influence the jurors in reaching their verdict.
GMAT-Club-Forum-ym7lijlb.png [ 120.12 KiB | Viewed 2859 times ]
Which of the following would, if true, most help to explain the surprising phenomenon described above?
A. Jurors in mock trials usually spend less time deliberating and worrying about reaching the right verdict than do jurors in actual trials.
B. Because expert testimony regarding physical evidence presented at trial is almost invariably given by witnesses testifying for one side or the other, many jurors regard such witnesses as biased.
C. The credibility that a particular juror will assign to a particular eyewitness will be profoundly influenced by personal characteristics of the eyewitness including age, gender, occupation, and appearance.
D. Even jurors who understand that eyewitnesses tend to be less reliable than physical evidence incorrectly believe they are better than the average juror at telling when an eyewitness’s testimony is reliable
E. The more complex the physical evidence presented at trial is, the less it will influence the jurors in reaching their verdict.
Attachment:
GMAT-Club-Forum-ym7lijlb.png [ 120.12 KiB | Viewed 2859 times ]
Updated on: 21 Sep 2024, 15:08
Originally posted by MartyMurray on 06 Feb 2024, 02:59.
Last edited by MartyMurray on 21 Sep 2024, 15:08, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by MartyMurray on 21 Sep 2024, 15:08, edited 1 time in total.
Kudos
Bookmarks
Most jurors will be more inclined to reach a verdict favorable to one side if that side’s case is based primarily on eyewitness testimony rather than on physical evidence backed by expert scientific testimony. Surprisingly, studies involving jurors in mock trials have found that this tendency survives even for those jurors who understand that eyewitness testimony is generally less reliable than is physical evidence backed by expert testimony.
Reading the passage, we see that it presents a surprising situation: Jurors will be more inclined to reach a verdict favorable to one side if that side’s case is based primarily on eyewitness testimony rather than on physical evidence backed by expert scientific testimony even if the jurors understand that eyewitness testimony is generally less reliable than physical evidence backed by expert testimony.
Which of the following would, if true, most help to explain the surprising phenomenon described above?
This is a Paradox or Best Explains question, and the correct answer will help to explain the surprising situation. In other words, it will make it less surprising.
A. Jurors in mock trials usually spend less time deliberating and worrying about reaching the right verdict than do jurors in actual trials.
Notice that this choice shows how mock trials are DIFFERENT from actual trials.
In contrast, what we need to explain is, basically, why some jurors in mock trials do basically the SAME thing jurors in real trials do.
Bringing up a way in which the two types of trials are different would not explain why the jurors in the two types of trials do the same thing.
Eliminate.
B. Because expert testimony regarding physical evidence presented at trial is almost invariably given by witnesses testifying for one side or the other, many jurors regard such witnesses as biased.
This choice seems potentially correct.
After all, if this choice is true, then we may have a reason why jurors tend to be more inclined to reach a verdict favorable to one side if that side’s case is based primarily on eyewitness testimony rather than on physical evidence backed by expert scientific testimony. That reason would be that jurors tend to believe that expert witnesses are biased. So, they prefer eyewitness testimony.
Keep.
C. The credibility that a particular juror will assign to a particular eyewitness will be profoundly influenced by personal characteristics of the eyewitness including age, gender, occupation, and appearance.
This choice is incorrect because it explains the wrong thing.
We need a choice that explains why jurors favor eyewitness testimony over physical evidence backed by scientific testimony.
This choice explains why jurors trust some eyewitnesses more than others.
Eliminate.
D. Even jurors who understand that eyewitnesses tend to be less reliable than physical evidence incorrectly believe they are better than the average juror at telling when an eyewitness’s testimony is reliable.
This choice is interesting.
If jurors who understand that eyewitnesses tend to be less reliable than physical evidence incorrectly believe they are better than the average juror at telling when an eyewitness’s testimony is reliable, then, even though eyewitness testimony is, in general, less reliable than physical evidence, the jurors who understand that may still favor eyewitness testimony because they believe that they can discern which eyewitness testimony to rely on and therefore rely on some eyewitness testimony, the eyewitness testimony that they believe to be reliable, more than physical evidence.
So, this choice could explain why jurors who understand that eyewitness testimony is less reliable than physical evidence still favor the side that uses eyewitnesses.
Keep.
E. The more complex the physical evidence presented at trial is, the less it will influence the jurors in reaching their verdict.
This choice is incorrect because it provides the wrong information.
We need a choice that provides information on why jurors favor eyewitness testimony over physical evidence backed by scientific testimony.
This choice provides information on a characteristic of physical evidence that causes some physical evidence to influence jurors more than other physical evidence.
Eliminate.
So, we are left with (B) and (D), and initially, I thought that this question to be flawed with no clear correct answer.
However, looking more carefully, we can see the following reason why (D) is the better answer.
The surprising situation involves the following people:
jurors who understand that eyewitness testimony is generally less reliable than is physical evidence backed by expert testimony
Notice that they "understand that eyewitness testimony is generally less reliable than is physical evidence backed by expert testimony."
Now, let's consider what (B) says:
many jurors regard such witnesses (expert witnesses) as biased
So, (B) seems to mean that many people believe that expert testimony is less reliable than eyewitness testimony because expert testimony is biased.
Notice the issue with that. The people involved in the surprising situation DON'T BELIEVE THAT. The passage states as fact that they "understand that eyewitness testimony is generally less reliable than physical evidence backed by expert testimony."
So, regardless of how biased they or anyone else believes expert testimony to be, the jurors involved in the surprising situation still believe that physical evidence backed by expert testimony is more reliable than eyewitness testimony.
Thus, (B) cannot explain why these jurors favor eyewitness testimony because (B) does not change the fact that they understand that eyewitness testimony is less reliable.
In contrast, as we have seen in our above discussion of (D), (D) does explain why jurors favor the side that uses eyewitness testimony even though they understand that, in general, eyewitness testimony is less reliable than physical evidence backed by expert testimony.
So, we can choose (D) as the correct answer.
Correct answer: D
Reading the passage, we see that it presents a surprising situation: Jurors will be more inclined to reach a verdict favorable to one side if that side’s case is based primarily on eyewitness testimony rather than on physical evidence backed by expert scientific testimony even if the jurors understand that eyewitness testimony is generally less reliable than physical evidence backed by expert testimony.
Which of the following would, if true, most help to explain the surprising phenomenon described above?
This is a Paradox or Best Explains question, and the correct answer will help to explain the surprising situation. In other words, it will make it less surprising.
A. Jurors in mock trials usually spend less time deliberating and worrying about reaching the right verdict than do jurors in actual trials.
Notice that this choice shows how mock trials are DIFFERENT from actual trials.
In contrast, what we need to explain is, basically, why some jurors in mock trials do basically the SAME thing jurors in real trials do.
Bringing up a way in which the two types of trials are different would not explain why the jurors in the two types of trials do the same thing.
Eliminate.
B. Because expert testimony regarding physical evidence presented at trial is almost invariably given by witnesses testifying for one side or the other, many jurors regard such witnesses as biased.
This choice seems potentially correct.
After all, if this choice is true, then we may have a reason why jurors tend to be more inclined to reach a verdict favorable to one side if that side’s case is based primarily on eyewitness testimony rather than on physical evidence backed by expert scientific testimony. That reason would be that jurors tend to believe that expert witnesses are biased. So, they prefer eyewitness testimony.
Keep.
C. The credibility that a particular juror will assign to a particular eyewitness will be profoundly influenced by personal characteristics of the eyewitness including age, gender, occupation, and appearance.
This choice is incorrect because it explains the wrong thing.
We need a choice that explains why jurors favor eyewitness testimony over physical evidence backed by scientific testimony.
This choice explains why jurors trust some eyewitnesses more than others.
Eliminate.
D. Even jurors who understand that eyewitnesses tend to be less reliable than physical evidence incorrectly believe they are better than the average juror at telling when an eyewitness’s testimony is reliable.
This choice is interesting.
If jurors who understand that eyewitnesses tend to be less reliable than physical evidence incorrectly believe they are better than the average juror at telling when an eyewitness’s testimony is reliable, then, even though eyewitness testimony is, in general, less reliable than physical evidence, the jurors who understand that may still favor eyewitness testimony because they believe that they can discern which eyewitness testimony to rely on and therefore rely on some eyewitness testimony, the eyewitness testimony that they believe to be reliable, more than physical evidence.
So, this choice could explain why jurors who understand that eyewitness testimony is less reliable than physical evidence still favor the side that uses eyewitnesses.
Keep.
E. The more complex the physical evidence presented at trial is, the less it will influence the jurors in reaching their verdict.
This choice is incorrect because it provides the wrong information.
We need a choice that provides information on why jurors favor eyewitness testimony over physical evidence backed by scientific testimony.
This choice provides information on a characteristic of physical evidence that causes some physical evidence to influence jurors more than other physical evidence.
Eliminate.
So, we are left with (B) and (D), and initially, I thought that this question to be flawed with no clear correct answer.
However, looking more carefully, we can see the following reason why (D) is the better answer.
The surprising situation involves the following people:
jurors who understand that eyewitness testimony is generally less reliable than is physical evidence backed by expert testimony
Notice that they "understand that eyewitness testimony is generally less reliable than is physical evidence backed by expert testimony."
Now, let's consider what (B) says:
many jurors regard such witnesses (expert witnesses) as biased
So, (B) seems to mean that many people believe that expert testimony is less reliable than eyewitness testimony because expert testimony is biased.
Notice the issue with that. The people involved in the surprising situation DON'T BELIEVE THAT. The passage states as fact that they "understand that eyewitness testimony is generally less reliable than physical evidence backed by expert testimony."
So, regardless of how biased they or anyone else believes expert testimony to be, the jurors involved in the surprising situation still believe that physical evidence backed by expert testimony is more reliable than eyewitness testimony.
Thus, (B) cannot explain why these jurors favor eyewitness testimony because (B) does not change the fact that they understand that eyewitness testimony is less reliable.
In contrast, as we have seen in our above discussion of (D), (D) does explain why jurors favor the side that uses eyewitness testimony even though they understand that, in general, eyewitness testimony is less reliable than physical evidence backed by expert testimony.
So, we can choose (D) as the correct answer.
Correct answer: D
24 Apr 2024, 10:10
Kudos
Bookmarks
ashutosh_73
The problem with choice (B) is that it doesn't explain the discrepancy presented in the passage.
We are told that the jurors understand that eyewitness testimony is generally less reliable than is physical evidence backed by expert testimony. So even though many jurors regard the witnesses presenting expert testimony as biased, the jurors still believe that eyewitness testimony is generally less reliable.
In other words, a juror can consider expert testimony to be biased but still believe that expert testimony is better (i.e. more reliable) than eyewitness testimony.
We need to resolve the discrepancy: given the fact in bold above, why are most jurors more inclined to reach a verdict favorable to one side if that side’s case is based primarily on eyewitness testimony?
Only choice (D) resolves that specific paradox. Yes, they generally consider eyewitness testimony to be less reliable than physical evidence backed by expert testimony, but they also believe that they can tell when eyewitnesses are reliable and when they are not!
The GENERAL belief -- that eyewitnesses are less reliable -- isn't an issue for those jurors because they think they can judge the reliability of the INDIVIDUAL eyewitness on the witness stand.
Choice (B) could help explain why jurors think eyewitnesses are more reliable than physical evidence with expert testimony -- but that would go against the passage and ELIMINATE the paradox, rather than EXPLAIN the paradox.
Only choice (D) explains the paradox, so that's our winner.
