Last visit was: 06 May 2024, 16:51 It is currently 06 May 2024, 16:51

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 Sep 2006
Posts: 50
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
VP
VP
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 1346
Own Kudos [?]: 5015 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: New York City
Send PM
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 31 Oct 2007
Posts: 58
Own Kudos [?]: 135 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 34
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink]
Personally, I don’t think Kaplan is a waste of time. I do not believe their tests are indicative of what you will face on the actual exam, but I believe that if you work through their math workbook you will have a strong grasp on the foundations you’ll need to approach GMAT problems. However, you must incorporate the Official Guides into your prep. No test company has really succeeded in mimicking GMAT test questions, IMHO. Personally, I’m not a huge fan of Manhattan GMAT guides. I believe their guides are geared towards those who just need to brush up. I don’t understand why they don’t just release one book and combine all the sections. That seems odd to me (I almost venture to think it’s because they can charge more by separating the books, but I’m trying to refrain from making any erroneous claims). Which book do you start with? There’s no logical sequence. If you just need help in just one or two areas, that’s fine, but if you struggle in quant, that isn’t much help. Second, they gloss over a lot of the building blocks and they overlap a lot of concepts. Kaplan is a lot more thorough in this regard. There is a logical sequence and each chapter builds off the last one. So it just depends, if you need help in just one or two areas, go with Manhattan GMAT. If you need help with everything, I recommend working through your Kaplan book. To answer the original question, no I don’t think they have changed that much.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Posts: 61
Own Kudos [?]: 10 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
[#permalink]
I don't know what forum you're reading, dude, but I've read very few posts so far where people say Kaplan and PR are garbage. I'm not personally a fan of Kaplan because I don't think their CATs are realistic, but they're still good practice (just ignore the scores and don't get caught up on verbal). I used Cracking the GMAT (PR's book) and it was a huge help. The tests were a lot like the real thing. I would definitely recommend it along with OG 11 and GMATPrep.

To the OP...if you have the 2005 or 2006 editions, that's probably ok. PR's most recent editions come with a DVD, which I got a lot out of. It has some very useful interactive lessons and tools and is cheap enough on Amazon that it might be worth getting anyway.
GMAT Club Bot
[#permalink]

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne