Last visit was: 07 May 2024, 06:02 It is currently 07 May 2024, 06:02

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Jun 2008
Posts: 19
Own Kudos [?]: 10 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 398
Own Kudos [?]: 1512 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Mar 2008
Posts: 50
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 46
Own Kudos [?]: 20 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: SC - federal law [#permalink]
1
Kudos
A bit tricky but I'll try to break it down.

For starters, the sentence is telling us that there is a federal law and (there is) a provincial law that are each valid and consistent.

There is a federal law AND (There is) a provincial law. The ‘AND’ is combining two clauses and the expletive construction takes on a singular verb as the second expletive construction is implied since it comes after a conjunction. It is NOT of the form ‘There are (a federal law and a provincial law)’ but of the form mentioned at the start.

However, the relative pronoun ‘THAT’ stands for (the federal law and the provincial law). Hence it will be followed by a plural verb.

That's why we can eliminate B, C and E.

The use of 'both of which are each' in Answer choice D is awkward.

Answer is A
VP
VP
Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Posts: 1230
Own Kudos [?]: 951 [0]
Given Kudos: 32
Location: Oklahoma City
Concentration: Life
Schools:Hard Knocks
 Q47  V42
Send PM
Re: SC - federal law [#permalink]
Great explanation Legend. +1

I came to A as the answer when I tried to think of another sentence using the same concepts that sounded more familiar to me. I came up with this sentence that helped me realize that A is correct. It's a funny sentence, but it helped me.

In New York there is a blue dot and a red dot that are each on a sign. That helped me see the sentence contains 2 items that are each singluar and therefore, the verb should be singular.

The reason "are" is correct in the second part of the sentence is because the sentence is referring to the 2 items collectively. When refer to 2 individual items collectively, it is plural and therefore "are" is correct.

Alternative sentence:

"A tree and a flower are what the teacher instructed us to paint."
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Jun 2008
Posts: 19
Own Kudos [?]: 10 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: SC - federal law [#permalink]
OA is B

can someone pls throw some more light on the usage of "are" and "is" in the context of this sentence .. it will help ....
VP
VP
Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Posts: 1230
Own Kudos [?]: 951 [0]
Given Kudos: 32
Location: Oklahoma City
Concentration: Life
Schools:Hard Knocks
 Q47  V42
Send PM
Re: SC - federal law [#permalink]
Nope, I can't shed any light on that. I think the answer is A for the reasons I posted above. Where did you get this question? Some sources are better than others due to mistakes in the answers.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 46
Own Kudos [?]: 20 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: SC - federal law [#permalink]
I really find it hard to believe that the answer is B. I'm disappointed now :( .

I guess that's the reason why I normally only do questions from official GMAT questions. ie. OG, GMAT Prep, Sets, 1000 SCs. No other testmaker's questions come close to the quality of those developed by ACT or ETS.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Sentence Correction (EA only) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: SC - federal law [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6922 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
Current Student
278 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne