Optional Essay to Address GMAT?

I agree with gobruins and yellowjacket. If you're in the 80% range, leave it alone.

Then again, how weak on quant? If you're still in the 70%+ range and your undergrad quant course grades are decent (B average or higher) I would leave it alone.

RF

I had a 46 quant (79%) and didn't explain it, but I have a moderate to decent level of quant/analytical work in college and my job. I figured that was enough. Plus, I had better things to talk about in the optional that was a positive thing to mention. No changing it now! (for me)

What is there to talk about really? If you're weak on quant, you're weak on quant. It's not really like classes and grades in school, for which there may be extenuating circumstances.

A 79% on quant is not worth bringing up. Anything above an 80% is fine. A 79% is close enough.

RF

What about a low AWA score? See any reason in justifying that? I have no idea how I did so poorly - 4.0.

overall is 83%/84%--700 so I don't put too much concern on the GMAT but I just can't figure out how I bombed the AWA.

Re: the AWA, any chance you left notes typed in at the bottom? I was worried I had done that.

For either of these scores, I'm going to take a page out of my dad's book when I asked if I could borrow the mercedes: "Address the GMAT in the optional essay? NaaaaAAAaaaa."

could be. I seriously wondered if I deleted the whole thing before submitting or something. I didn't study much for it but I did study a little and I had reviewed 6.0 essays and developed a plan to mimic them. Again, no clue how a 4.0 happened. I have a friend who is a published author and has won many writing contests...he got a 4.5. Made me feel a lot better about the obscurity of the grading structure.

I scored terribly in the quant section (67%tile) (and that was the higher of my two scores!) and still got a 710 due to a 46 (99%tile) on Verbal. Odd thing for me is that I am a financial professional, (series 7, banking training program and corporate finance background).

It annoys the hell out of me that I did that poorly, but I didn't talk about it in my optional section at Kellogg, mainly because I think anyone looking at my application will be able to determine that I have strong quant and math skills from college finance and calculus classes, and relevant work experience. I don't know why the hell I did so badly in those tests, as I didn't do that badly in the practice tests.

I hope the test doesn't end up being a critical flaw in my application, but if schools like Kellogg and Chicago really mean what they say about looking at the "whole" you, I can't I am hopeful that the rest of application compensates.

Granted, if I get dinged from Kellogg in R1, I will retake the test again in time for Chicago R2.

Hey Manbehindthecurtain, I'm in a similar position to you numberswise but from a different background. I got a 44Q, 44V for a 710. I decided not to discuss the GMAT score on my application. I have some decent though nothing outstanding (B in Calculus 2 for scientists and engineers, B+ in Game Theory) undergrad coursework but nothing exceptional. My Kellogg interviewer asked my GMAT score and we ended up discussing the breakdown. His take was that I'm a nonprofit guy looking to do more nonprofit and will be taking mostly management classes at Kellogg and they know that and aren't going to sweat the 70% quant score. I'm hoping that that is sound advice.

Hello from the GMAT Club MBAbot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.