NEW HERE? LEARN MORE
closeclose
Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 21:35 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 21:35
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New posts
New comers' posts

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel

Financial success does not guarantee happiness. This claim is not mere

SORT BY:
Date
Kudos
Tags:
Find Similar Topics 
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
cbrf3
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Feb 2004
Posts: 190
Own Kudos [?]: 28 [12]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: USA
Send PM
Financial success does not guarantee happiness. This claim is not mere [#permalink] New post   Updated on: 20 Feb 2020, 01:12
12
Bookmarks
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

65% (01:52) correct 35% (02:09) wrong based on 1078 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
Financial success does not guarantee happiness. This claim is not mere proverbial wisdom but a fact verified by statistics. In a recently concluded survey, only one-third of the respondents who claimed to have achieved financial success reported that they were happy.

Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the conclusion drawn from the survey results?


(A) The respondents who reported financial success were, for the most part, financially successful

(B) Financial success was once thought to be necessary for happiness but is no longer considered a prerequisite for happiness

(C) Many of the respondents who claimed not to have achieved financial success reported that they were happy five years ago

(D) Many of the respondents who failed to report financial success were in fact financially successful

(E) Most of the respondents who reported they were unhappy were in fact happy.
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
A

Originally posted by cbrf3 on 08 Mar 2004, 09:48.
Last edited by Bunuel on 20 Feb 2020, 01:12, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
L
KarishmaB
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14823
Own Kudos [?]: 64925 [0]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Financial success does not guarantee happiness. This claim is not mere [#permalink] New post   18 Aug 2019, 22:35
Expert Reply
cbrf3 wrote:
Financial success does not guarantee happiness. This claim is not mere proverbial wisdom but a fact verified by statistics. In a recently concluded survey, only one-third of the respondents who claimed to have achieved financial success reported that they were happy.

Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the conclusion drawn from the survey results?

(A) The respondents who reported financial success were, for the most part, financially successful

(B) Financial success was once thought to be necessary for happiness but is no longer considered a prerequisite for happiness

(C) Many of the respondents who claimed not to have achieved financial success reported that they were happy five years ago

(D) Many of the respondents who failed to report financial success were in fact financially successful

(E) Most of the respondents who reported they were unhappy were in fact happy.



Survey - only one-third of the respondents who claimed to have achieved financial success reported that they were happy

Conclusion: Financial success does not guarantee happiness.

As discussed number of times before, the most important point in CR questions is to understand the argument well. Look at what the survey found - 1/3 of respondents who claimed to have fin success reported happiness.
But our conclusion says fin success does not guarantee happiness. It does not say that people who claim to have fin success needn't be happy.
So even before you move on to the options, you should note this difference in wording.

Which option supports the conclusion:

(A) The respondents who reported financial success were, for the most part, financially successful

This option tells us that most of those who claim to be financially successful, actually are financially successful. Then the results of the survey are actually valid. This does support that financial success does not guarantee happiness.

(B) Financial success was once thought to be necessary for happiness but is no longer considered a prerequisite for happiness

Our conclusion says that fin success is not sufficient for happiness. Whether it is necessary for happiness or not, is irrelevant to our argument.

(C) Many of the respondents who claimed not to have achieved financial success reported that they were happy five years ago

Were they financially successful five years ago or not, we don't know. So this option is irrelevant. No need to evaluate.

(D) Many of the respondents who failed to report financial success were in fact financially successful

The survey does not care about those who did not report financial success. We are only told about the result of those who claimed to be financially successful. Our conclusion is then drawn from only that pool. Say there were 500 participants. 200 said they were financially successful. 65 of these 200 said they were happy. Are we bothered about the 300 who said they were not fin successful? No. The survey results do not talk about them.
We don't now whether those who failed to report fin success reported being happy or not. Hence, this does not help establish our conclusion.

(E) Most of the respondents who reported they were unhappy were in fact happy.

This doesn't help our conclusion. If anything, it weakens it a tad.

Answer (A)
General Discussion
User avatar
nakib77
Director
Director
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 986
Own Kudos [?]: 3462 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Dhaka
Send PM
Re: Financial success does not guarantee happiness. This claim is not mere [#permalink] New post   08 Nov 2005, 08:38
1
Bookmarks
I got A.

A. is assuming that the other 2 third who did not claim to have achieved financial success are happy or they are actually not financially successful.
either way if those who claimed to be financially successful, are actually successful, then it strengthens the conclusion.
B. is totally out of scope
C. those who are not financially successful were happy 5 years ago, does help us resolve anything.
D. Is a trap. if most people who failed to report financial success are in fact suceessful, there will be a lot of happy people who are financially successful.
so it weakens the conclusion.
E. also weakens the conclusion
User avatar
B
LogicGuru1
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Posts: 484
Own Kudos [?]: 2335 [2]
Given Kudos: 36
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
Send PM
Re: Financial success does not guarantee happiness. This claim is not mere [#permalink] New post   10 Aug 2016, 06:39
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Financial success does not guarantee happiness. This claim is not mere proverbial wisdom but a fact verified by statistics. In a recently concluded survey, only one-third of the respondents who claimed to have achieved financial success reported that they were happy.

Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the conclusion drawn from the survey results?

Background:- The old age proverb is you can't buy happiness. Meaning Money cannot buy happiness

Premise 1) Financial Success does not guarantee happiness
Premise 2) This is proved by statistical studies
Conclusion) In a survey only one-third (33%) of the respondent who CLAIMED to have achieved financial success said they were happy.


The conclusion is a very tricky one because it makes some test taker to think about the remaining two third 66% of people and this will make them to infer and assume things that are not explicitly mentioned in the argument. DON'T DO THAT. Remember we don't have to include them in our thought process. Since the argument draws conclusion about 33% of people so this is the subset that we will use to strengthen out conclusion.

Now what if these 33% happy people were actually utter failures in their life or only moderately successful but due to some misguided sense of prosperity/richness they thought they were financially successful. --> Then it would mean that they were happy but not really financially successful. Then the argument will fall apart. We have remove any doubt about their financial success and by doing so we will show that they were indeed successful and indeed happy.

What option does the trick
OPTION A
(A) The respondents who reported financial success were, for the most part, financially successful.
Meaning they were really successful and also happy.


(A) The respondents who reported financial success were, for the most part, financially successful.
CORRECT

(B) Financial success was once thought to be necessary for happiness but is no longer considered a prerequisite for happiness.
WRONG :-DEEP PHILOSOPHICAL INCORRECT ANSWER :) IRRELEVANT

(C) Many of the respondents who claimed not to have achieved financial success reported that they were happy five years ago.
WRONG:- Not successfull right now ---> happy five years ago--> currently happy or unhappy ???
The option prompts that they are unhappy .
argument is successfull ---> happy
Option is Not successfull---> not happy
Mistaken reversal.

(D) Many of the respondents who failed to report financial success were in fact financially successful.
WRONG:-Does not give us any idea about the sate of happiness of such participant and thus cannot be use to strengthen the conclusion.

(E) Most of the respondents who reported they were unhappy were in fact happy.
Wrong:- Does not give us the link between financial success and state of happiness/unhappiness of such participants. Cannot be used to strengthen the argument.


Antmavel wrote:
Financial success does not guarantee happiness. This claim is not mere proverbial wisdom but a fact verified by statistics. In a recently concluded survey, only one-third of the respondents who claimed to have achieved financial success reported that they were happy.

Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the conclusion drawn from the survey results?

(A) The respondents who reported financial success were, for the most part, financially successful.
(B) Financial success was once thought to be necessary for happiness but is no longer considered a prerequisite for happiness.
(C) Many of the respondents who claimed not to have achieved financial success reported that they were happy five years ago.
(D) Many of the respondents who failed to report financial success were in fact financially successful.
(E) Most of the respondents who reported they were unhappy were in fact happy.
User avatar
L
abhimahna
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Posts: 3600
Own Kudos [?]: 5426 [0]
Given Kudos: 346
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Financial success does not guarantee happiness. This claim is not mere [#permalink] New post   10 Aug 2016, 10:21
Expert Reply
LogicGuru1 wrote:
Financial success does not guarantee happiness. This claim is not mere proverbial wisdom but a fact verified by statistics. In a recently concluded survey, only one-third of the respondents who claimed to have achieved financial success reported that they were happy.

Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the conclusion drawn from the survey results?

Background:- The old age proverb is you can't buy happiness. Meaning Money cannot buy happiness

Premise 1) Financial Success does not guarantee happiness
Premise 2) This is proved by statistical studies
Conclusion) In a survey only one-third (33%) of the respondent who CLAIMED to have achieved financial success said they were happy.


The conclusion is a very tricky one because it makes some test taker to think about the remaining two third 66% of people and this will make them to infer and assume things that are not explicitly mentioned in the argument. DON'T DO THAT. Remember we don't have to include them in our thought process. Since the argument draws conclusion about 33% of people so this is the subset that we will use to strengthen out conclusion.

Now what if these 33% happy people were actually utter failures in their life or only moderately successful but due to some misguided sense of prosperity/richness they thought they were financially successful. --> Then it would mean that they were happy but not really financially successful. Then the argument will fall apart. We have remove any doubt about their financial success and by doing so we will show that they were indeed successful and indeed happy.

What option does the trick
OPTION A
(A) The respondents who reported financial success were, for the most part, financially successful.
Meaning they were really successful and also happy.


(A) The respondents who reported financial success were, for the most part, financially successful.
CORRECT

(B) Financial success was once thought to be necessary for happiness but is no longer considered a prerequisite for happiness.
WRONG :-DEEP PHILOSOPHICAL INCORRECT ANSWER :) IRRELEVANT

(C) Many of the respondents who claimed not to have achieved financial success reported that they were happy five years ago.
WRONG:- Not successfull right now ---> happy five years ago--> currently happy or unhappy ???
The option prompts that they are unhappy .
argument is successfull ---> happy
Option is Not successfull---> not happy
Mistaken reversal.

(D) Many of the respondents who failed to report financial success were in fact financially successful.
WRONG:-Does not give us any idea about the sate of happiness of such participant and thus cannot be use to strengthen the conclusion.

(E) Most of the respondents who reported they were unhappy were in fact happy.
Wrong:- Does not give us the link between financial success and state of happiness/unhappiness of such participants. Cannot be used to strengthen the argument.


Antmavel wrote:
Financial success does not guarantee happiness. This claim is not mere proverbial wisdom but a fact verified by statistics. In a recently concluded survey, only one-third of the respondents who claimed to have achieved financial success reported that they were happy.

Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the conclusion drawn from the survey results?

(A) The respondents who reported financial success were, for the most part, financially successful.
(B) Financial success was once thought to be necessary for happiness but is no longer considered a prerequisite for happiness.
(C) Many of the respondents who claimed not to have achieved financial success reported that they were happy five years ago.
(D) Many of the respondents who failed to report financial success were in fact financially successful.
(E) Most of the respondents who reported they were unhappy were in fact happy.


Although I have marked the answer as A and I completely agree that it validates the accuracy of the survey and hence strengthens the conclusion, I have a concern with your explanation here.

You said the conclusion is "In a survey only one-third (33%) of the respondent who CLAIMED to have achieved financial success said they were happy."

but don't you think the conclusion of the argument is "Financial success does not guarantee happiness.".

Survey given is only strengthening the conclusion. I understand that we have claimed and concluded words in the last line, but if we look from an overall argument perspective, the conclusion would be what I said above.

Please provide your thoughts here.
User avatar
B
LogicGuru1
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Posts: 484
Own Kudos [?]: 2335 [1]
Given Kudos: 36
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
Send PM
Re: Financial success does not guarantee happiness. This claim is not mere [#permalink] New post   10 Aug 2016, 12:55
1
Bookmarks
abhimahna wrote:
Although I have marked the answer as A and I completely agree that it validates the accuracy of the survey and hence strengthens the conclusion, I have a concern with your explanation here.

You said the conclusion is "In a survey only one-third (33%) of the respondent who CLAIMED to have achieved financial success said they were happy."

but don't you think the conclusion of the argument is "Financial success does not guarantee happiness.".

Survey given is only strengthening the conclusion. I understand that we have claimed and concluded words in the last line, but if we look from an overall argument perspective, the conclusion would be what I said above.

Please provide your thoughts here.


As i have written earlier in my post
The conclusion is a very tricky one because it makes some test taker to think about the remaining two third 66% of people and this will make them to infer and assume things that are not explicitly mentioned in the argument. DON'T DO THAT. Remember we don't have to include them in our thought process. Since the argument draws conclusion about 33% of people so this is the subset that we will use to strengthen out conclusion.


The conclusion does not even touch the statistics or numbers or variety of people who are unhappy. If we start thinking about that group then we will have to go into the territory of inference and assumption. But thats not what the questions is asking.
Its like (2 | 2 )= 4 now you can either use (2 * 2) = 4 or (2+2)= 4 Multiplication and addition would give the same result if there was no condition But if the question have a condition that you cannot use multiplication then 2*2 = 4 will become wrong and only 2 + 2 = 4 will be the valid answer. Similarly even though we can definitely make some inferences about the unhappy 2/3 rd people. But that is not the question is asking us to do. The question is about conclusion and not inferences or assumption.

Remember Conclusion will always be mentioned if the question is asking about strenghtening the conlusion. Inference is something that can be "derived" using one or more or some combination of premises. It is never stated or written explicitly in the argument. INFERENCES by definition are secondary conclusion that can also be derived by using the premises.
Here in this case a clear definite explicit conclusion is given to us. Anything else that deviates from the conclusion but satisfy the premises of the argument will most likely be an inference. So the 2/3rd people are not happy is an inference.
Hope you get it now !
User avatar
B
abrakadabra21
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 261
Own Kudos [?]: 170 [0]
Given Kudos: 342
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Schools: Yale '18 ISB '18 (D) Judge"18
Send PM
Re: Financial success does not guarantee happiness. This claim is not mere [#permalink] New post   10 Aug 2016, 19:52
LogicGuru1 wrote:
abhimahna wrote:
Although I have marked the answer as A and I completely agree that it validates the accuracy of the survey and hence strengthens the conclusion, I have a concern with your explanation here.

You said the conclusion is "In a survey only one-third (33%) of the respondent who CLAIMED to have achieved financial success said they were happy."

but don't you think the conclusion of the argument is "Financial success does not guarantee happiness.".

Survey given is only strengthening the conclusion. I understand that we have claimed and concluded words in the last line, but if we look from an overall argument perspective, the conclusion would be what I said above.

Please provide your thoughts here.


As i have written earlier in my post
The conclusion is a very tricky one because it makes some test taker to think about the remaining two third 66% of people and this will make them to infer and assume things that are not explicitly mentioned in the argument. DON'T DO THAT. Remember we don't have to include them in our thought process. Since the argument draws conclusion about 33% of people so this is the subset that we will use to strengthen out conclusion.


The conclusion does not even touch the statistics or numbers or variety of people who are unhappy. If we start thinking about that group then we will have to go into the territory of inference and assumption. But thats not what the questions is asking.
Its like (2 | 2 )= 4 now you can either use (2 * 2) = 4 or (2+2)= 4 Multiplication and addition would give the same result if there was no condition But if the question have a condition that you cannot use multiplication then 2*2 = 4 will become wrong and only 2 + 2 = 4 will be the valid answer. Similarly even though we can definitely make some inferences about the unhappy 2/3 rd people. But that is not the question is asking us to do. The question is about conclusion and not inferences or assumption.

Remember Conclusion will always be mentioned if the question is asking about strenghtening the conlusion. Inference is something that can be "derived" using one or more or some combination of premises. It is never stated or written explicitly in the argument. INFERENCES by definition are secondary conclusion that can also be derived by using the premises.
Here in this case a clear definite explicit conclusion is given to us. Anything else that deviates from the conclusion but satisfy the premises of the argument will most likely be an inference. So the 2/3rd people are not happy is an inference.
Hope you get it now !

I got your point.

But financial sucess doesnt gurantee happiness seems conclusion to me basesd on premises that present survey result. How come result of survey a conclusion. Ultimate goal is to arrive at the point whether financial success gurantee happiness or not.

Sent from my Moto G (4) using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
User avatar
B
LogicGuru1
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Posts: 484
Own Kudos [?]: 2335 [0]
Given Kudos: 36
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
Send PM
Re: Financial success does not guarantee happiness. This claim is not mere [#permalink] New post   10 Aug 2016, 21:41
Going by the flow of the premises, I agree :- "financial success does not guarantee happiness" should/could have been the conclusion
But since the author of the argument has already given us a conclusion in a roundabout way and then asked us to strengthen it, we will have to accept his conclusion and the argument as a whole. Among the given option choices "A" does the strengthening and rest all are incorrect.

abrakadabra21 wrote:
LogicGuru1 wrote:
abhimahna wrote:
Although I have marked the answer as A and I completely agree that it validates the accuracy of the survey and hence strengthens the conclusion, I have a concern with your explanation here.

You said the conclusion is "In a survey only one-third (33%) of the respondent who CLAIMED to have achieved financial success said they were happy."

but don't you think the conclusion of the argument is "Financial success does not guarantee happiness.".

Survey given is only strengthening the conclusion. I understand that we have claimed and concluded words in the last line, but if we look from an overall argument perspective, the conclusion would be what I said above.

Please provide your thoughts here.


As i have written earlier in my post
The conclusion is a very tricky one because it makes some test taker to think about the remaining two third 66% of people and this will make them to infer and assume things that are not explicitly mentioned in the argument. DON'T DO THAT. Remember we don't have to include them in our thought process. Since the argument draws conclusion about 33% of people so this is the subset that we will use to strengthen out conclusion.


The conclusion does not even touch the statistics or numbers or variety of people who are unhappy. If we start thinking about that group then we will have to go into the territory of inference and assumption. But thats not what the questions is asking.
Its like (2 | 2 )= 4 now you can either use (2 * 2) = 4 or (2+2)= 4 Multiplication and addition would give the same result if there was no condition But if the question have a condition that you cannot use multiplication then 2*2 = 4 will become wrong and only 2 + 2 = 4 will be the valid answer. Similarly even though we can definitely make some inferences about the unhappy 2/3 rd people. But that is not the question is asking us to do. The question is about conclusion and not inferences or assumption.

Remember Conclusion will always be mentioned if the question is asking about strenghtening the conlusion. Inference is something that can be "derived" using one or more or some combination of premises. It is never stated or written explicitly in the argument. INFERENCES by definition are secondary conclusion that can also be derived by using the premises.
Here in this case a clear definite explicit conclusion is given to us. Anything else that deviates from the conclusion but satisfy the premises of the argument will most likely be an inference. So the 2/3rd people are not happy is an inference.
Hope you get it now !

I got your point.

But financial sucess doesnt gurantee happiness seems conclusion to me basesd on premises that present survey result. How come result of survey a conclusion. Ultimate goal is to arrive at the point whether financial success gurantee happiness or not.

Sent from my Moto G (4) using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
User avatar
VerbalBot
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17223
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Financial success does not guarantee happiness. This claim is not mere [#permalink] New post   27 Jan 2024, 11:32
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
gmatclubot
Re: Financial success does not guarantee happiness. This claim is not mere [#permalink]
27 Jan 2024, 11:32
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
mysterymanrog
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne
Main navigation
GMAT Resources
Partners
MBA Resources
www.gmac.com|www.mba.com | | GMAT Club Rules | Terms and Conditions