Review of GMATPrep Exam Pack 2: Two full length official GMAT tests

chetan2u , dabral has a good point. To me as well the way the question is written, it is ambiguous. But then after spending 5-10 seconds, I can see if it is 2^3 then cubing this values will lead you to 2^9 and none of the options have that big of a number as the option. So it can not be that.

FYI, it is not as "clear" as you are making it out to be. The extra 5-10 seconds that I spent on figuring out the correct question may be the difference when I sit down for my GMAT.

GMAT has always been known to remove any sort of ambiguity be it technical or just representational.

Hi,
I think there is no ambigouity, unless we are making one for ourselves..

You have to understand that if 3 is part of 2^3 3 will lie between 2 and the root sign..
If 3 is on top of root sign, it is part of the root and it is upto us to make it complicated and spend time on it..
This is a Mathematical formula and 3 cannot shift from being power of 2 to top of root sign

write the two forms you are confused with and you will realize both are different when written...
and to save 5-10 seconds in actual GMAT would be to know how each mathematical formula looks like, rather than leaving it to interpretations..

shasadou

When I looked at the repeat question closely, it turns out that they are 99% identical, but are different questions. The correct answer is the same and the question statement is almost the same except the letter used for the variables, and all of the answer choices are the same except for one. So they are technically different questions. Of course, including almost identical questions in the database is a poor choice. I will bring this up with GMAC, and recommend them to delete one of them.

In summary, you are safe and you should not see any repetition, except this single case, which technically are two different questions.

Cheers,
Dabral

I am no longer active on this forum.

My wild guess is that this is a real retired question, meaning it has gone through testing and difficulty correlation, thus being "confusing" or "misleading" it was good enough to mislead only the weak test takers and not the stronger ones. Thank you for bring this trick up - I have not encountered many like these, but good to see some of the ones they use to catch us offguard... while not perhaps most fair question, it was tested and passed the muster. Tell me if I am off.

Thanks for the analysis.

How do the GMATEXAMPACK 2 question variety and general difficulty level compare to those of the GMATEXAMPACK 1?
Any noticeable shifts noticed e.g. more word problems ?

I purchased the two additional full length official GMAT tests a week before my actual GMAT. In general, I found these two tests tougher than the first two full length official tests. Although I scored on average 40 points lower on the CAT 3 and CAT 4, I believe attempting these helped me get out of the complacency zone I was in after getting high scores in the first two CATs. The lower scores actually gave me the push I needed in the last week running upto GMAT. In the end, I scored 20 points more than my average score of CAT 3 and 4.

If one has time on his side, CAT 3 and CAT 4 are definitely good to have and are more closer to the actual GMAT than any of Manhattan CATs.

yes, definitely! no other practice tests come closer to simulating the real exam conditions than the official GMAT tests.

Hi BB
Does premium members get any discount if buying these 2 tests from GMAT Club or are you still working on this ?

At the moment you will get a discount on the "previous" or "original" bundle (EP1 + QP2). We have not figured out how to get a discount on the new bundle and make economic sense since we used to subsidize the old one.

Hi Dabral,

Thanks for the observations...I felt the same way, and it also showed in my respective scores on each test. Do you think this might be because both tests in this Exam Pack (5 and 6) are pulling from the same composite question pool?

For GMAT 700+ scorers, it is easy to understand how a higher-than-usual amount of questions in the pool (in this case, double) would result in a student getting twice as many hard questions as usual.

From what I understand, each test of 90 questions comes from a pool of about 150 possible questions (if anyone has a hard number on this, I'd appreciate it). It is possible that both tests 5 and 6 are pulling from the same pool of about 300 questions...meaning that on our first test (test 5), there were almost twice as many hard questions available as usual, which could account for our noticing a higher level of difficulty on that test. And on the second test, there were fewer harder problems left to give, because the GMAC doesn't want us to see the same question on each test.

This could also have consequences for students on the lower rung of the scoring ladder, who might see an easier test than usual on test #5 because of this (potential) software flaw.

The GMAC has repeatedly stressed in its official materials that a correct answer to a hard question will not always be followed by another hard question, because there is a limited number of hard questions of that type in the pool. However, the question that I have yet to answer is, is the pool of questions on the actual GMAT 300 questions, or is it closer to half of that? I have yet to discover the answer, because the GMAC has always released its practice CATs in sets of two.

If it is the latter, then in order to make these exams more realistic--and equally difficult--the GMAC would do well to release a GMATPrep software update that limits each test to half of the 300 or so possible questions (quant and verbal combined).

I am a fan of your work, and I keep sending students your way for helpful videos, information etc.

-Brian

I am no longer active on this forum.

Hi Brian,

1) Yes, what you are saying is correct and Exam 5 and 6 are both pulling the questions from the same composite pool. It is entirely possible that the reason Exam 5 on average has a higher difficulty for a strong student is because it has exhausted bulk of the hard questions in the administration of Exam 5, and on the subsequent attempt at Exam 6 by a strong student the software is left with fewer hard questions for Exam 6. I do know that in the initial release of the free GMATPrep software, the question pools for the two tests were separate. In later revisions to the software, the pool was merged. I have no idea why that was done.

2) So far I know that the combined 74 quant questions for Exam 5 and Exam 6 are being selected from a database of approximately 220 questions in the case of Exam Pack 2. In case of the free GMATPrep tests(Exam 1 and Exam 2), the 74 questions are being selected from a much larger pool of around 700 quant questions. That is one reason why repeating Exam 1 and Exam 2 still gives more or less fresh questions.

3) As for the actual GMAT, I think the pool of questions is significantly larger. I don't have a number but I am guessing it should be closer to being in the thousands, I have seen 5000 being thrown around.

4) I agree with you that the best approach is to separate the database of questions that Exam 5 and Exam 6 are selecting the items from. As I said before this used to be the case with the initial release of GMATPrep in early 2006, but is no longer the case. I have no idea why that was done. I would love someone from GMAC to expand on this.

Thanks for the kind words.

Cheers,
Dabral

Hi Dabral,

Thanks for your help. Well, if you've counted 220 Quantitative questions per Exam Pack test, then we can assume that the number of Verbal questions is similar. Thus, there are about 400 questions in the question pool.

Question Pack 1 has 200 Quantitative questions, 180 Verbal Questions and 24 IR questions (404 total), so I imagine the numbers on the CATs are similar.

If the real GMAT has thousands of questions in the pool, then why would the GMAC tell us that it might run out of questions of a certain difficulty level (page 8 of OFG)? Seems suspect, but I imagine that there is no way to know for sure unless they tell us.

I am no longer active on this forum.

Hi experts, please help me in justifying the my result from this Exam Pack 2.

I recently got V40 (RC 38, SC 40, CR 42). As usual, there are 13 RC, 17 SC and 11 CR questions in Verbal section. I was incorrect in 2 RC questions (so 11/13 correct) and 4 CR questions (so 7/11 correct). The weird thing was that I found 2 incorrect RC questions so difficult, while 2-3 incorrect CR questions are easy (at least they are not at the same level as the 2 incorrect RC questions are).

As I understand, GMAC algorithm is that an incorrect easy question is more harmful than an incorrect hard question. So I was very confused with the result (42CR and 38 RC).

I wouldn't say that an incorrect easy question is more harmful than an incorrect hard question. The impact on your score has more to do with where in the test those questions appeared (early, in the middle, or late?).