Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Jul 2014, 06:05

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 09 Aug 2006
Posts: 529
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to [#permalink] New post 03 Jul 2007, 12:20
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
20. Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to perform specified actions on a certain fixed date, with the actions of each conditional on simultaneous action taken by the other countries. Each country was also to notify the six other countries when it had completed its action.

The simultaneous-action provision of the treaty leaves open the possibility that
(A) the compliance date was subject to postponement, according to the terms of the treaty
(B) one of the countries might not be required to make any changes or take any steps in order to comply with the treaty, whereas all the other countries are so required.
(C) each country might have a well-founded excuse, based on the provision, for its own lack of compliance
(D) the treaty specified that the signal for one of the countries to initiate action was notification by the other countries that they had completed action
(E) there was ambiguity with respect to the date after which all actions contemplated in the treaty are to be complete.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2006
Posts: 130
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 03 Jul 2007, 12:49
I go for E
because it adress an issue that has not been taken into account; that is the time at which all those actions should be completed since coutries are only bond to notify whether actions of the other countries are complete.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 May 2007
Posts: 181
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 03 Jul 2007, 17:49
Between B and D, I choose B
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Posts: 254
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 03 Jul 2007, 19:00
A.

Just fyi... this question would not appear on the gmat. It's a pure lsat question.
GMAT Instructor
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Posts: 1270
Location: Madrid
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Nations .. [#permalink] New post 04 Jul 2007, 01:51
Amit05 wrote:
20. Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to perform specified actions on a certain fixed date, with the actions of each conditional on simultaneous action taken by the other countries. Each country was also to notify the six other countries when it had completed its action.

The simultaneous-action provision of the treaty leaves open the possibility that
(A) the compliance date was subject to postponement, according to the terms of the treaty
(B) one of the countries might not be required to make any changes or take any steps in order to comply with the treaty, whereas all the other countries are so required.
(C) each country might have a well-founded excuse, based on the provision, for its own lack of compliance
(D) the treaty specified that the signal for one of the countries to initiate action was notification by the other countries that they had completed action
(E) there was ambiguity with respect to the date after which all actions contemplated in the treaty are to be complete.


C. If the other countries had not taken any action, Country A could cite this non-compliance as a reason for its inaction
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2006
Posts: 130
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 04 Jul 2007, 04:47
C--> each country...for its own...
are you sure you can interpret C that way?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2006
Posts: 130
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 04 Jul 2007, 04:50
Owww :o i understand... i made a mistake... prefer C
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2007
Posts: 109
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 04 Jul 2007, 08:23
I would also go for C
  [#permalink] 04 Jul 2007, 08:23
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to amd08 4 04 Apr 2007, 15:38
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to shahnandan 4 12 Nov 2005, 06:14
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to macca 2 21 Oct 2005, 06:06
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to rahulraao 21 18 Sep 2005, 16:46
Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to WinWinMBA 6 26 Apr 2005, 15:29
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.