Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Earning a 100th percentile score on the GMAT Focus is no easy feat. But with Target Test Prep, any score is possible. Take Ming, a TTP student who recently scored 755 (Q86/V88/DI86) on the GMAT Focus Edition.
Join Our "Master Multi-Source Reasoning Questions by Owning the Dataset” Session! Tackling Multi-Source Reasoning (MSR) on the GMAT can be like navigating through a complex maze.
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
The Target Test Prep team is excited to announce multiple live online classes for GMAT Focus test-takers in May. Our 40-hour LiveTeach program will take your GMAT Focus score to the next level.
Think a 100% GMAT Focus Verbal score is out of your reach? TTP will make you think again! Our course uses techniques such as topical study and spaced repetition to maximize knowledge retention and make studying simple and fun.
The method of reproducing paintings designed to restore the
[#permalink]
22 Jun 2005, 19:23
Show timer
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct
0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 1
sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
The method of reproducing paintings designed to restore the richness of a painting's orginal colors will result in reproductions that look less like the original painting looks now than those produced by older methods. To reproduction experts, a reproduction that looks less like the original painting looks now, regardless of its own aesthetic value, is an inferior reproduction. Reproduction experts are the only accepted evaluators of the quality of a reproduction.
If the statements above are true, which of the following conclusions could be most properly drawn?
(A)The best judges of the quality of the reproductions are the purchasers of such reproductions
(B)Reproduction experts over see the reproduction of paintings
(C)The highest quality reproductions are made close to the time of the original painting
(D)It is not currently possible for a reproduction to restore a painting's original color and be considered high-quality by the accepted evaluators
(E)The new method can be used to produce reproductions considered high-quality by everyone except reproduction experts
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Re: The method of reproducing paintings designed to restore the
[#permalink]
23 Jun 2005, 06:12
TooLegitToQuit wrote:
The OA is (D) but I picked (C)
Can someone explain to me why C isn't a good answer? Thanks.
(C)The highest quality reproductions are made close to the time of the original painting
There is no evidence in the passage to substantiate (C). Just because the "older" method of production is "better" doesn't make it the "best". And there is a possibility there is a third method out there that could be the "best". The passage only mentioned two. The rest cannot be inferred.
Remember, a trap in English language is that when you compare TWO things, one can be "better" than the other. But to be the "best", you have to have at least THREE things.
Re: The method of reproducing paintings designed to restore the
[#permalink]
23 Jun 2005, 08:32
WinWinMBA wrote:
TooLegitToQuit wrote:
The OA is (D) but I picked (C)
Can someone explain to me why C isn't a good answer? Thanks.
(C)The highest quality reproductions are made close to the time of the original painting
There is no evidence in the passage to substantiate (C). Just because the "older" method of production is "better" doesn't make it the "best". And there is a possibility there is a third method out there that could be the "best". The passage only mentioned two. The rest cannot be inferred.
Remember, a trap in English language is that when you compare TWO things, one can be "better" than the other. But to be the "best", you have to have at least THREE things.
Well said!!
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
gmatclubot
Re: The method of reproducing paintings designed to restore the [#permalink]