Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 12:05 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 12:05

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Feb 2006
Posts: 224
Own Kudos [?]: 601 [203]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42104 [41]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Posts: 12
Own Kudos [?]: 24 [20]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2013
Posts: 104
Own Kudos [?]: 4042 [12]
Given Kudos: 17
Send PM
Re: When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York [#permalink]
9
Kudos
3
Bookmarks
When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York City before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825, it took three weeks and cost $100, but when the canal was used, it took less than eight days and cost less than $6.

A. When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York City before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825, it took three weeks and cost $100, but when the canal was used, it - No antecedent of "IT", use of WHEN is redundant as the time period is clearly mentioned, 1825

B. Moving a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825, it took three weeks and cost $100; using the canal, it - No antecedent of "IT"

C. Before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825, moving a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City took three weeks and cost $100; on the canal the move - CORRECT

D. In 1825, before opening the Erie Canal, to move a ton of wheat took three weeks from Buffalo to New York City, which cost $100; moving it on the canal - "From Buffalo to New York City" is wrongly placed, and thus this placement distorts the meaning (Now, It means that X took 3 weeks from buffalo to New york). "opening the Erie Canal" should be "opening OF the Erie Canal". How can New york city cost $100?

E. To move a ton of wheat in 1825 from Buffalo to New York City took - Out-rightly incorrect
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Aug 2012
Posts: 36
Own Kudos [?]: 496 [7]
Given Kudos: 105
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 510 Q36 V25
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Other)
Send PM
Re: When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York [#permalink]
5
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
The question posted was incorrect , find below the actual GMAT prep Q

When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York City
before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825, it
took three weeks and cost
$100, but when the canal was used, it took less than eight days and cost
less than $6.
A. When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York City before
the opening of the
Erie Canal in 1825, it took three weeks and cost $100, but
when the canal was used, it
B. Moving a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City before the opening of the
Erie Canal in 1825, it took three weeks and cost $100; using the canal, it
C. Before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825, moving a ton of wheat from
Buffalo to New York City took three weeks and cost $100; on the canal the
move
D. In 1825, before opening the Erie Canal, to move a ton of wheat took three
weeks from Buffalo to New York City, which cost $100; moving it on the canal
E. To move a ton of wheat in 1825 from Buffalo to New York City took three weeks
before the opening of the Erie Canal, costing $100, but in using the canal, the
move .

Thanks
TT
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Sep 2011
Posts: 258
Own Kudos [?]: 1371 [2]
Given Kudos: 46
Location: United States
WE:Corporate Finance (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
A) When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York City before the opening the Erie Canal in 1825, it took three weeks and cost $90, but when the canal was used, it "was being" is redundant; relative pronoun "when" should be "before" or "after"

B) Moving a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City before the opening the Erie Canal in 1825, it took three weeks, costing $90; using the canal, it "it" has no referent, so the opening modifier is dangling

C) Moving a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City before the opening the Erie Canal in 1825 took three weeks and cost $90; on the canal, the move OK

D) Before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825, to move a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City took three weeks and cost $90; using it, the move "it" does not have a referent

E) To move a ton of wheat took three weeks and cost $90 from Buffalo to New York City before the opening the Erie Canal in 1825; on the canal, it "it" does not have a referent
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Sep 2011
Posts: 258
Own Kudos [?]: 1371 [2]
Given Kudos: 46
Location: United States
WE:Corporate Finance (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York [#permalink]
2
Bookmarks
A) When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York City before the opening the Erie Canal in 1825, it took three weeks and cost $100, but when the canal was used, it "was being" is redundant' "it" has no logical referent

B) Moving a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City before the opening the Erie Canal in 1825, it took three weeks, costing $90; using the canal, it "it" has no referent; "costing" is misplace modifier (describes a cause-effect relationship OR the something in the previous clause?); "it" cannot use the canal (since there's no logic referent)

C) Moving a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City before the opening the Erie Canal in 1825 took three weeks and cost $90; on the canal, the move OK - Perhaps "moving" and "move" are not parallel so as to trick into eliminating answer choice.

D) Before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825, to move a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City took three weeks and cost $90; using it, the move ""it" has no referent

E) To move a ton of wheat took three weeks and cost $90 from Buffalo to New York City before the opening the Erie Canal in 1825; on the canal, it "it" has no referent; "from Buffalo to NYC before..." all describe "cost", thereby making the sentence illogical
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 May 2013
Posts: 42
Own Kudos [?]: 70 [1]
Given Kudos: 243
Send PM
Re: When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York [#permalink]
1
Kudos
selene wrote:
When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York City before the opening the Erie Canal in 1825, it took three weeks and cost $90, but when the canal was used, it took eight days and cost $4.

A) same

B) Moving a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City before the opening the Erie Canal in 1825, it took three weeks, costing $90; using the canal, it

C) Moving a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City before the opening the Erie Canal in 1825 took three weeks and cost $90; on the canal, the move

D) Before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825, to move a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City took three weeks and cost $90; using it, the move

E) To move a ton of wheat took three weeks and cost $90 from Buffalo to New York City before the opening the Erie Canal in 1825; on the canal, it



A: "Was being moved" a continuous action is unnecessary here.
B: "using " must refer to a Noun. "It" cannot work here as a Noun because of lack of a referent.
C-OK
D:The canal was opened in 1825, not the action was done in that year
E: Same as above. 1825 must refer to the year of opening
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42104 [5]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York [#permalink]
2
Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
The issues are parallelism, incorrect word order leading to altered intent and pronoun ambiguity

A. When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York City before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825, it took three weeks and cost $100, but when the canal was used, it ---- 'It' lacks clear antecedence. It must refer to moving but has no such word in the text. In addition was being is ugly and does not refer to the generalization but to a specific instance

B. Moving a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825, it took three weeks and cost $100; using the canal, it --- This is a fragment because of the redundant use the pronoun ‘it’ .

C. Before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825, moving a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City took three weeks and cost $100; on the canal the move -- looks like error-free.

D. In 1825, before opening the Erie Canal, to move a ton of wheat took three weeks from Buffalo to New York City, which cost $100; moving it on the canal ----– Pushing the prepositional modifier ‘in 1825’ is wrong order. Now it modifies the entire following clause, thereby implying that all the events pertain to only the year 1825 only, neither before nor after.

E. To move a ton of wheat in 1825 from Buffalo to New York City took three weeks before the opening of the Erie Canal, costing $100, but in using the canal, the move --- Parallelism is missing between the infinitive clause and the prepositional clause around the conjunction ’but’. In addition, the expression ‘three weeks before the opening of the Erie Canal’ alters the intent that it pertains to a single event that happened three weeks before the opening ceremony.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1015
Own Kudos [?]: 2755 [1]
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Send PM
Re: When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York [#permalink]
1
Kudos
When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York City before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825, it took three weeks and cost $100, but when the canal was used, it took less than eight days and cost less than $6.

In the above sentence, when incorrectly refers to it and "ton of wheat was being moved" is worn here. It does not refer to noun so there is a pronoun error but action(moving wheat). Buffalo refers to city here.(Actually I found out after googling otherwise i thought it refers to animal :wink: ) But indicates the contrast but used incorrectly here.

So A is wrong for reasons as mentioned above.

B. Moving a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825, it took three weeks and cost $100; using the canal, it

There is no proper verb for the 1st sentence and no proper relation between the independent clause and dependent clause.
It does not refer to noun instead refers to action(moving sth). Pronoun error as in A.
Improper usage of it is contd in 2nd sentence also.

C. Before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825, moving a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City took three weeks and cost $100; on the canal the move

Here Moving becomes a gerund and all errors are corrected.

D. In 1825, before opening the Erie Canal, to move a ton of wheat took three weeks from Buffalo to New York City, which cost $100; moving it on the canal.

Before opening Erie canal incorrectly modifies 1825 thereby indicates wrong meaning.
It means as if The movement if wheat took place in 1825 and starting a sentence with infinitive is not preferred.
It implies that City costs 100$.
There is an error of pronoun ambiguity even though it appears to refer to wheat.

E. To move a ton of wheat in 1825 from Buffalo to New York City took three weeks before the opening of the Erie Canal, costing $100, but in using the canal, the move

errors in D repeated here.
It means as if The movement if wheat took place in 1825 and starting a sentence with infinitive is not preferred.
It implies that Canal costs 100$. but in using the canal is improper again.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 128
Own Kudos [?]: 714 [0]
Given Kudos: 138
Location: Brazil
GMAT 1: 470 Q30 V20
GMAT 2: 620 Q42 V33
Send PM
Re: When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York [#permalink]
Hi guys,

Can someone clarify why there is no need for comma in the underlined portion??

C. Before ... on the canal the movetook less than eight days and cost less than $6.
CR Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2413
Own Kudos [?]: 15266 [0]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York [#permalink]
Expert Reply
felippemed wrote:
Hi guys,

Can someone clarify why there is no need for comma in the underlined portion??

C. Before ... on the canal the movetook less than eight days and cost less than $6.


Do you mean a comma after "canal"? Comma after an opening prepositional phrase is used if the phrase is long (more than 3-4 words according to some grammarians).
Manager
Manager
Joined: 20 Sep 2016
Posts: 91
Own Kudos [?]: 165 [0]
Given Kudos: 207
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.99
Send PM
Re: When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York [#permalink]
daagh wrote:


E. To move a ton of wheat in 1825 from Buffalo to New York City took three weeks before the opening of the Erie Canal, costing $100, but in using the canal, the move --- Parallelism is missing between the infinitive clause and the prepositional clause around the conjunction ’but’. In addition, the expression ‘three weeks before the opening of the Erie Canal’ alters the intent that it pertains to a single event that happened three weeks before the opening ceremony.


Is modifier 'costing $100' correctly used in E? I thought it awkwardly modifies 'to move a ton of wheat...'
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Posts: 3600
Own Kudos [?]: 5428 [0]
Given Kudos: 346
Send PM
Re: When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York [#permalink]
Expert Reply
kivalo wrote:
daagh wrote:


E. To move a ton of wheat in 1825 from Buffalo to New York City took three weeks before the opening of the Erie Canal, costing $100, but in using the canal, the move --- Parallelism is missing between the infinitive clause and the prepositional clause around the conjunction ’but’. In addition, the expression ‘three weeks before the opening of the Erie Canal’ alters the intent that it pertains to a single event that happened three weeks before the opening ceremony.


Is modifier 'costing $100' correctly used in E? I thought it awkwardly modifies 'to move a ton of wheat...'


yes, that is also an issue with E. It is very awkward. To be precise, it is called a dangling modifier.
Director
Director
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 510
Own Kudos [?]: 3379 [7]
Given Kudos: 877
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York [#permalink]
6
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
A and B: "it took three weeks"
Here, "it" lacks a clear antecedent.
Eliminate A and B.

D: "before opening the Erie Canal, to move a ton of wheat took 3 weeks"
Here, it is unclear who or what is opening the Erie Canal.
Eliminate D.

E: "in using the canal, the move took less than eight days"
Here, "using" seems to refer to "the move", implying that THE MOVE was USING the canal.
Not the intended meaning.
Eliminate E.
The correct answer is C.

Example :-
"Before attending law school, John studied at the local college".
Here, "before attending" serves to refer to "John" -- the subject of the following clause -- conveying that JOHN was ATTENDING law school.

If in the OA we replace "before the opening of the Erie Canal" with "before opening the Erie Canal", we get:
"Before opening the Erie Canal in 1825, "moving a ton of wheat" from Buffalo to New York City took three weeks".
Here, "before opening" seems to refer to moving a ton of wheat -- the subject of the following clause -- implying that MOVING A TON OF WHEAT was OPENING the Erie Canal.
This meaning is nonsensical.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2017
Posts: 457
Own Kudos [?]: 724 [0]
Given Kudos: 294
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GPA: 4
Send PM
Re: When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York [#permalink]
Hello Experts,

In option C "moving" is used as a GERUND here right? please confirm or let me know if I am wrong :-)
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4349
Own Kudos [?]: 30802 [0]
Given Kudos: 637
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Re: When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York [#permalink]
Expert Reply
pikolo2510 wrote:
Hello Experts,

In option C "moving" is used as a GERUND here right? please confirm or let me know if I am wrong :-)



Hello pikolo2510,

I will be glad to help you out with this one. :-)

Yes indeed, the word moving in Choice C is the verb-ing noun form or the gerund.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Posts: 99
Own Kudos [?]: 141 [0]
Given Kudos: 275
Location: India
GMAT 1: 560 Q48 V20
WE:Other (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York [#permalink]
abhimahna Could you please explain why B is wrong?

How is B acting as a fragmat?

Why can't It be dummy pronoun here?
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Posts: 3600
Own Kudos [?]: 5428 [1]
Given Kudos: 346
Send PM
Re: When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Prashant10692 wrote:
abhimahna Could you please explain why B is wrong?

How is B acting as a fragmat?

Why can't It be dummy pronoun here?


Hi Prashant10692 ,

B is a disaster here. Let's discuss how:

B) Moving a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City before the opening the Erie Canal in 1825,

Error 1: it took three weeks, --> Moving took two weeks or Opening tool two weeks? Not clear.

Error 2: costing $90; --> Remember , ing form? It is used either to show cause and effect or to descrive something in the clause before comma. Are we saying? Taking 3 weeks was costing or the result of taking three weeks was costing?

Error 3: using the canal, it took less than eight days and cost less than $6. --> What is it referring to? Canal? Really?

Hence, B is wrong for so many reasons. I would worry about only one and I am done. :)
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4349
Own Kudos [?]: 30802 [3]
Given Kudos: 637
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Re: When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
nahid78 wrote:
Can anyone please explain the use of "THE" (the move) in option C?



Hello nahid78,

I will be glad to help you out with this one. :-)


The article the is used to present a definite noun.

This official sentence talks about moving a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City on two occasions:
i. Before the Erie Canal opened
ii. After the Erie Canal opened


Since, the sentence talks about the same move = transporting a ton of wheat from point A to point B in two different time periods, usage of the before move is correct as it talks about that particular move the sentence has already mentioned previously.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
GMAT Club Bot
Re: When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne