Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 18:49 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 18:49
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2 
605-655 Level|   Clauses|   Pronouns|      
User avatar
Setback
User avatar
Joined: 23 Jan 2018
Last visit: 22 Aug 2020
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
12
Given Kudos: 38
Posts: 14
Kudos: 12
When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York 16 Jul 2018, 01:51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh Sir, In the answer choice B, if "it took three weeks and cost $100" were placed before the phrase "Moving a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825" to form "It took three weeks and cost $100,moving a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825...", would this construction, or the whole sentence rather, then be accepted as correct? Since,as per my understanding, "It" now has a clear antecedent, "moving a ton of wheat" after the comma, unlike "it" in the original construction.
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,419
 [2]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,419
 [2]
When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York 16 Jul 2018, 03:30
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Setback
Your changed version:
Quote:
It took three weeks and cost $100,moving a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825
Show more

Since you feel that 'it' now stands for ' moving a ton of wheat', let's see how the sentence comes out after replacing the pronoun.
Moving a ton of wheat took three weeks and cost $100, moving a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825

Does this sentence make sense? The problem is that that you should not seek to find an antecedent for the 'it'. It is just a filler and standard usage in written texts.
User avatar
Nikhil
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 22 May 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 13,201
Own Kudos:
9,839
Given Kudos: 3,295
Affiliations: GMATClub
GPA: 3.4
Products:
My Reviews
Posts: 13,201
Kudos: 9,839
When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York 16 Jul 2018, 03:49
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
selene


(C) Before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825, moving a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City took three weeks and cost $100; on the canal the move

Show more

I eliminated option C because "moving a ton of wheat" forms the subject for the first independent clause and the noun phrase starting with verb-ing noun should be considered as singular. Hence it requires singular verb "costs"

egmat daagh or someone can you help me identify where I am getting this wrong ?
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,419
 [2]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,419
 [2]
When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York 16 Jul 2018, 05:36
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
workout
In this context, the word 'cost' is the past tense of the singular cost/costs. as the sentence is in past tense.
We also use 'costed' as the past tense of cost, when we talk of an estimate of cost, such as in 'the stormwater drainage project was costed by the government $100 million originally."
User avatar
SonalSinha803
User avatar
Joined: 14 Feb 2018
Last visit: 18 Feb 2019
Posts: 306
Own Kudos:
319
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 306
Kudos: 319
When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York 16 Jul 2018, 09:36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I preferred sticking to A because "the move" was very unusual. I have never read it being used in this manner.

Sent from my Lenovo K53a48 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,419
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,419
When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York 16 Jul 2018, 10:01
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sonal
The problem with A is the use of past progressive tense 'was being moved". It may connote just one single instance when the cargo was being transferred rather than the overall high cost and excessive time the move generally involved in those days, which is the real intent of the comparison.
User avatar
lakshya14
User avatar
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Last visit: 27 Jul 2022
Posts: 360
Own Kudos:
45
Given Kudos: 529
Posts: 360
Kudos: 45
When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York 11 May 2020, 06:21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi, in (C) the modifier is not modifying the wheat?
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,511
 [2]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,511
 [2]
When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York 11 May 2020, 07:26
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
lakshya14
Hi, in (C) the modifier is not modifying the wheat?
Show more
Hello, lakshya14. I am not sure to what modifier you may be referring in (C). The gerund phrase moving a ton of wheat... acts as the subject of the main clause, the first independent clause of the sentence. As such, it is not a modifier. Notice how the verb took indicates a preceding subject. Neither is the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825 acting as a modifier, instead being used as another gerund, the subject of the introductory clause. What we have in (C) is a perfectly parallel and relatively straightforward sentence. It would be cumbersome to replace the concise the move with a second gerund phrase when the only move that has been described is the first one. In other words, it is clear that we are comparing like to like, without repeating the details. The sentence:

(C) Before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825, moving a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City took three weeks and cost $100; on the canal the move took less than eight days and cost less than $6.

I hope that helps. If you have further questions about this one, feel free to ask.

- Andrew
User avatar
CRACKGMATNUT
User avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2020
Last visit: 26 May 2024
Posts: 150
Own Kudos:
31
Given Kudos: 30
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Marketing
Schools: Ivey '24 (A)
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
Schools: Ivey '24 (A)
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
Posts: 150
Kudos: 31
When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York 04 Sep 2021, 07:25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi EducationAisle

I got this question right, but I am still confused on the usage of before. Isn't before a subordinate clause that join 2 clauses. A some other GMATPREP question uses before for presenting a clause, I will tag in you in that question as well.
User avatar
EducationAisle
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York 04 Sep 2021, 08:20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mayank221133
Hi EducationAisle

I got this question right, but I am still confused on the usage of before. Isn't before a subordinate clause that join 2 clauses. A some other GMATPREP question uses before for presenting a clause, I will tag in you in that question as well.
Show more
Yes Mayank, "before" can be used both as a preposition (as is the case in option C in this sentence) and as a subordinating conjunction (marking the start of a dependent clause).
User avatar
thakurarun85
User avatar
Joined: 10 Jul 2021
Last visit: 21 Sep 2022
Posts: 224
Own Kudos:
53
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 224
Kudos: 53
When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York 07 Sep 2021, 21:58
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
selene
When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York City before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825, it took three weeks and cost $100, but when the canal was used, it took less than eight days and cost less than $6.

(A) When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York City before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825, it took three weeks and cost $100, but when the canal was used, it

(B) Moving a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825, it took three weeks and cost $100; using the canal, it

(C) Before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825, moving a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City took three weeks and cost $100; on the canal the move

(D) In 1825, before opening the Erie Canal, to move a ton of wheat took three weeks from Buffalo to New York City, which cost $100; moving it on the canal

(E) To move a ton of wheat in 1825 from Buffalo to New York City took three weeks before the opening of the Erie Canal, costing $100, but in using the canal, the move
Show more

In most options what cost is? is it a verb? in such case it should be singular. (costs) please clarify.
User avatar
Namangupta1997
User avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2020
Last visit: 05 Apr 2025
Posts: 145
Own Kudos:
8
Given Kudos: 63
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Posts: 145
Kudos: 8
When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York 28 Mar 2022, 09:44
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Shouldn't there be a usage of "but" in the sentence to bring out the contrast ?
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,511
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,511
When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York 28 Mar 2022, 11:33
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Namangupta1997
Shouldn't there be a usage of "but" in the sentence to bring out the contrast ?
Show more
Hello, Namangupta1997. When a semicolon is used to join two independent clauses, it takes the place of whichever coordinating conjunction would be used, so it would be grammatically incorrect to see a sentence that used a semicolon in this context and then added but. A comma would need to appear instead.

Acceptable: Independent clause 1, [coordinating conjunction] independent clause 2

Acceptable: Independent clause 1; independent clause 2

Unacceptable: Independent clause 1; [coordinating conjunction] independent clause 2

It is also acceptable to see a semicolon used with an adverb—e.g., nevertheless, moreover—before launching into the second independent clause, but such transition words are not to be confused with coordinating conjunctions.

Acceptable: Independent clause 1; adverb, independent clause 2

Perhaps this information will prove useful to you the next time you come across a question that includes a semicolon. Good luck with your studies.

- Andrew
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,195
Own Kudos:
4,766
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,195
Kudos: 4,766
When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York 29 Mar 2022, 01:04
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Namangupta1997
Shouldn't there be a usage of "but" in the sentence to bring out the contrast ?
Show more

Hello Namangupta1997,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, if the relation between two independent clauses is apparent from the construction of the clauses, they can be joined with a semicolon without the need for conjunction to convey the meaning; the semicolon plays the grammatical role of the conjunction, and the meaning conveyed by the conjunction is considered implicit.

For example, "I need to go to sleep now; I need to get up early."

This sentence does not require conjunction such as "because" or "since" to convey the cause-effect relationship between the clauses; this relation is implicit.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
Namangupta1997
User avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2020
Last visit: 05 Apr 2025
Posts: 145
Own Kudos:
8
Given Kudos: 63
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Posts: 145
Kudos: 8
When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York 29 Mar 2022, 06:34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AndrewN
Namangupta1997
Shouldn't there be a usage of "but" in the sentence to bring out the contrast ?
Hello, Namangupta1997. When a semicolon is used to join two independent clauses, it takes the place of whichever coordinating conjunction would be used, so it would be grammatically incorrect to see a sentence that used a semicolon in this context and then added but. A comma would need to appear instead.

Acceptable: Independent clause 1, [coordinating conjunction] independent clause 2

Acceptable: Independent clause 1; independent clause 2

Unacceptable: Independent clause 1; [coordinating conjunction] independent clause 2

It is also acceptable to see a semicolon used with an adverb—e.g., nevertheless, moreover—before launching into the second independent clause, but such transition words are not to be confused with coordinating conjunctions.

Acceptable: Independent clause 1; adverb, independent clause 2

Perhaps this information will prove useful to you the next time you come across a question that includes a semicolon. Good luck with your studies.

- Andrew
Show more

Hi AndrewN

I appreciate your explanation about ICs and semi-colons but my question essentially was , if we have one answer choice that uses "but" and the other answer choice that joins 2 ICs with a semi-colon, shouldn't we go for the choice that uses a conjunction to join 2 contrasting statements ? Are both constructions grammatically correct ? Yes. But which answer choice makes meaning/gist of the statement more apparent to the reader ? Maybe the one actually using a conjunction that triggers the thought of contrast in the mind of the reader.

Am I making any sense ?
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,511
 [2]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,511
 [2]
When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York 29 Mar 2022, 07:01
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Namangupta1997
Hi AndrewN

I appreciate your explanation about ICs and semi-colons but my question essentially was , if we have one answer choice that uses "but" and the other answer choice that joins 2 ICs with a semi-colon, shouldn't we go for the choice that uses a conjunction to join 2 contrasting statements ? Are both constructions grammatically correct ? Yes. But which answer choice makes meaning/gist of the statement more apparent to the reader ? Maybe the one actually using a conjunction that triggers the thought of contrast in the mind of the reader.

Am I making any sense ?
Show more
It makes no difference, Namangupta1997. If both iterations of a sentence are grammatically sound, and they both can be interpreted in the same way, then you cannot disfavor one over another on the grounds that one simply appears the way you want it to. A semicolon is more versatile than a specific coordinating conjunction, but does that make it any worse if the context of the sentence suggests the same interpretation? Consider:

1) I like to walk; I sometimes drive to get to work.
2) I like to walk, but I sometimes drive to get to work.

In the first sentence, the semicolon could reasonably be interpreted as yet, but the contrast is clear—and or so, for example, would not logically fit—and in the second sentence, yet could just as well have been used instead of but. We can only go by what we see in front of us, not by what we want to be there, and in this case, the semicolon is just as functional, so we would need to turn to a different consideration (if this were part of a lengthier SC question) to favor one whole answer choice over the other.

Thank you for following up.

- Andrew
User avatar
Raman109
User avatar
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Last visit: 28 Jul 2025
Posts: 805
Own Kudos:
170
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 805
Kudos: 170
When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York 24 Oct 2023, 20:52
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York City before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825, it took three weeks and cost $100, but when the canal was used, it took less than eight days and cost less than $6.

Option Elimination -

(A) When a ton of wheat was being moved from Buffalo to New York City before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825, it took three weeks and cost $100, but when the canal was used, it - What is "it" referring to? The act of moving? It can't refer to an action. Again the second "it." What is it referring to? The act of using the canal? Again, "it" as a pronoun can't refer to the action. Wrong.

(B) Moving a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825, it took three weeks and cost $100; using the canal, it - ING verbal before the clause will modify the subject. Here, "Moving a ton of a wheat..." Who? "It"? "it" as a pronoun can't move anything. Wrong. Again, "using the canal." Who used the canal? "it"? Wrong.

(C) Before the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825, moving a ton of wheat from Buffalo to New York City took three weeks and cost $100; on the canal the move - okay.

(D) In 1825, before opening the Erie Canal, to move a ton of wheat took three weeks from Buffalo to New York City, which cost $100; moving it on the canal - "which" referring to what? New York City? Wrong.

(E) To move a ton of wheat in 1825 from Buffalo to New York City took three weeks before the opening of the Erie Canal, costing $100, but in using the canal, the move - "costing $100" is adverbial modifying "took." Does it even make sense? No. Moreover, "using the canal" modifies "the move." Meaning as if the move used the canal. Rodiculous.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
miag
189 posts