Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 19 May 2013, 18:42
Customize  |  Hide

After suffering $2 billion in losses and 25,000 layoffs, the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 36
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

After suffering $2 billion in losses and 25,000 layoffs, the [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2008, 13:48
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
After suffering $2 billion in losses and 25,000 layoffs, the nations semiconductor industry, which makes chips that run everything from computers and spy satellites to dishwashers, appears to have made a long-awaited recovery.

A. computers and spy satellites to dishwashers, appears to have

B. computers, spy satellites, and dishwashers, appears having

C. computers, spy satellites, and dishwashers, appears that it has

D. computers and spy satellites to dishwashers, appears that it has

E. computers and spy satellites as well as dishwashers, appears to have
Director
Director
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 661
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 7

GMAT Tests User
Re: 1000SC- semiconductor [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2008, 14:13
mba9now wrote:
After suffering $2 billion in losses and 25,000 layoffs, the nations semiconductor industry, which makes chips that run everything from computers and spy satellites to dishwashers, appears to have made a long-awaited recovery.

A. computers and spy satellites to dishwashers, appears to have

B. computers, spy satellites, and dishwashers, appears having

C. computers, spy satellites, and dishwashers, appears that it has

D. computers and spy satellites to dishwashers, appears that it has

E. computers and spy satellites as well as dishwashers, appears to have


Correct idiom from X to Y, hence cancel out B,C and E.

A and D are confusing one. The subject "the nations semiconductor industry" is singular. But D is little awakward. Still since D is matching with subject. IMO D
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 36
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: 1000SC- semiconductor [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2008, 14:16
The answer is A.

I am confused -- 'industry' does not agree with 'have'.

Can someone please explain. Thank you
SVP
SVP
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1553
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: 1000SC- semiconductor [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2008, 14:55
sure, "to have" has its own special role in this sentence. This type of construction is called the perfect infinitive. Its grammar structure is "to have + past participle." It indicates an action happening before the main verb. Let me give you an example:

I would have liked to have heard rock music.

one more note, this structure is fixed whether the subject is singular or plural.
hope this helps
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 36
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: 1000SC- semiconductor [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2008, 15:36
Thank you tarek99.
Is this rule in MGMAT SC book? Did I miss it?

If not, can you point me to the source so I can read more.
SVP
SVP
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1553
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: 1000SC- semiconductor [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2008, 15:55
well, i got this from the online lessons of gmaxonline.com, which was really helpful.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 1003
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 5

GMAT Tests User
Re: 1000SC- semiconductor [#permalink] New post 20 Jul 2008, 14:34
Anyone know why D is wrong then? Is it because the "it" is not clearly defined?
SVP
SVP
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1553
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: 1000SC- semiconductor [#permalink] New post 20 Jul 2008, 15:26
I guess the reason D is wrong is that the proper idiomatic usage for appear is "appear to + verb", which option D doesn't have.
Re: 1000SC- semiconductor   [#permalink] 20 Jul 2008, 15:26
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts After suffering $2 billion in losses and 25,000 layoffs, the ashkg 3 27 Jun 2004, 12:11
New posts After suffering $2 billion in losses and 25,000 layoffs, the gmataquaguy 3 21 Jun 2005, 11:10
New posts After suffering $2 billion in losses and 25,000 layoffs, the ywilfred 4 07 Sep 2005, 08:05
New posts After suffering $2 billion in losses and 25,000 layoffs, the Macedon 4 22 Sep 2005, 14:24
New posts 1 After suffering $2 billion in losses and 25,000 layoffs, the kenguva 4 13 Dec 2011, 07:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by

After suffering $2 billion in losses and 25,000 layoffs, the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.