Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

A.. SI tells us that the tens digit is a factor of units digit so possible values of units digit are 4,6,8,9.....all would be even nos except no ending with digit 9, which will be 39... so all r composite.... SII.. no can be any of 21,22,23.....29..ie mix of composite and prime
_________________

An integer grater than 1 that is not prime is called composite. If the two-digit integer n is greater than 20, is n composite?

Given: \(n>20\) --> two digit integer can be written as follows: \(n=10b+a>20\) --> \(2\leq{b}\leq{9}\), \(0\leq{a}\leq{9}\).

(1) The tens digit of n is a factor of the units digit of n. This statement implies that \(a=kb\), (\(0\leq{k}\leq{4}\)) --> \(n=10b+a=10b+kb=b(10+k)\) --> as \(b\geq{2}\), \(n\) will always be composite and factor of \(b\). Sufficient

(2) The tens digit of n is 2. This statement implies that \(b=2\), but \(n\) can be for instance composite 25 or prime 29. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

chetan2u wrote:

A.. SI tells us that the tens digit is a factor of units digit so possible values of units digit are 4,6,8,9.....all would be even nos except no ending with digit 9, which will be 39... so all r composite.... SII.. no can be any of 21,22,23.....29..ie mix of composite and prime

Actually units digit of \(n\) can be any digit but 1, meaning that 0, 2, 3, 5, 7 too. And for 9: 99 also fits: eg . 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 22, 33, 55, 77, 99.
_________________

Q13: An integer greater than 1 that is not prime is called composite. If the two-digit integer n is greater than 20, is n composite?

(1) The tens digit of n is a factor of the units digit of n. (2) The tens digit of n is 2.

Not sure about the ans

The moment I hear two digit prime number, I think of numbers having 1/3/7/9 as unit's digit. A two digit number ending in 0/2/4/5/6/8 cannot be prime since they are either even or a multiple of 5 (if it is a single digit, 5 is prime)

Stmnt 1: Ten's digit is a factor of the unit's digit. It is easy to see that there are many such composite numbers e.g. 24, 26 etc.

I will try to find if there are any such prime numbers: The only factor of 1 is 1; of 3 are 1 and 3; of 7 are 1 and 7; of 9 are 1, 3 and 9. 11, 13, 17 and 19 are not allowed since the number should be greater than 20. 33, 77, 39 and 99 are all composite. So there is no such prime number. All such number will be composite so n is composite. Hence sufficient.

Stmnt 2: The tens digit of n is 2. 21 is not prime while 23 is. Hence not sufficient.

An integer greater than 1 that is not [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Jan 2013, 04:29

The tricky thing about this question was for me a very simple thing, i.e. pace. Because I was in a hurry I did not wrote down n > 20 and therefore 11 was in my range. So my advice is be calm. Because 11 is a prime where the tens digit is a factor of the units digit. This is correct isn't it?

Re: An integer grater than 1 that is not prime is called [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Jun 2014, 19:00

Hi Bunuel,

I got the answer by other way. However, i would like to understand your explanation on (1) where you stated that a=kb, (0<=k<=4) --> n=10b+a=10b+kb=b(10+k) --> as b>=2, n will always be composite and factor of b.

Can you please explain in detail this a=kb part? why (0<=k<=4)?

I got the answer by other way. However, i would like to understand your explanation on (1) where you stated that a=kb, (0<=k<=4) --> n=10b+a=10b+kb=b(10+k) --> as b>=2, n will always be composite and factor of b.

Can you please explain in detail this a=kb part? why (0<=k<=4)?

Regards, Mitesh

(1) says that the tens digit of n, which is b, is a factor of the units digit of n, which is a. So, b is a factor of a --> \(a=kb\), for some integer k.

As for \(0\leq{k}\leq{4}\): the least value of b is 2, thus if k is 5 or more, then a becomes 10 or more, which is not possible since we know that a is a digit (\(0\leq{k}\leq{4}\)).

Re: An integer grater than 1 that is not prime is called [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Aug 2015, 21:22

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

An integer grater than 1 that is not prime is called [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Dec 2015, 09:37

X & Y wrote:

An integer grater than 1 that is not prime is called composite. If the two-digit integer n is greater than 20, is n composite?

(1) The tens digit of n is a factor of the units digit of n. (2) The tens digit of n is 2

The most important point is here that means that tens digit is > 1 (because 1 is a factor of any number, and it would make the whole calculation here too complex) 1 is a divisor of every integer. And zero is a multiple of every integer, including zero.

(1) If a units digit has a factor other than 1 and itself it's not prime, consider also these numbers 33, 44, 55 etc which have 11 as a factor- \(SUFFICIENT\) (2) We already know that. Clearly not sufficient Answer A
_________________

When you’re up, your friends know who you are. When you’re down, you know who your friends are.

Share some Kudos, if my posts help you. Thank you !

A two digit number comprised of two composite numbers is always composite. (1) is sufficient.

B is not sufficient. With thens digit as 2, the number could be 29, which is prime and 24, which is composite.

Hi, the statement may not be correct... 89 is a prime number, which has both digits composite.. stat 1 is suff but not for the reason you have mentioned.. there is no prime number till 100 satisfying the condition of 1
_________________

Re: An integer grater than 1 that is not prime is called [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Dec 2015, 04:23

chetan2u wrote:

hdwnkr wrote:

A two digit number comprised of two composite numbers is always composite. (1) is sufficient.

B is not sufficient. With thens digit as 2, the number could be 29, which is prime and 24, which is composite.

Hi, the statement may not be correct... 89 is a prime number, which has both digits composite.. stat 1 is suff but not for the reason you have mentioned.. there is no prime number till 100 satisfying the condition of 1

Thanks a lot. Much appreciated. Was figuring out ways to remember certain tricks. Thanks again for the correction
_________________

Re: An integer grater than 1 that is not prime is called [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Jul 2016, 01:25

Bunuel wrote:

An integer grater than 1 that is not prime is called composite. If the two-digit integer n is greater than 20, is n composite?

Given: \(n>20\) --> two digit integer can be written as follows: \(n=10b+a>20\) --> \(2\leq{b}\leq{9}\), \(0\leq{a}\leq{9}\).

(1) The tens digit of n is a factor of the units digit of n. This statement implies that \(a=kb\), (\(0\leq{k}\leq{4}\)) --> \(n=10b+a=10b+kb=b(10+k)\) --> as \(b\geq{2}\), \(n\) will always be composite and factor of \(b\). Sufficient

(2) The tens digit of n is 2. This statement implies that \(b=2\), but \(n\) can be for instance composite 25 or prime 29. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

chetan2u wrote:

A.. SI tells us that the tens digit is a factor of units digit so possible values of units digit are 4,6,8,9.....all would be even nos except no ending with digit 9, which will be 39... so all r composite.... SII.. no can be any of 21,22,23.....29..ie mix of composite and prime

Actually units digit of \(n\) can be any digit but 1, meaning that 0, 2, 3, 5, 7 too. And for 9: 99 also fits: eg . 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 22, 33, 55, 77, 99.

Hi ,

What about No. 71 . it is a prime number and 7 is factor of 1.

An integer grater than 1 that is not prime is called composite. If the two-digit integer n is greater than 20, is n composite?

Given: \(n>20\) --> two digit integer can be written as follows: \(n=10b+a>20\) --> \(2\leq{b}\leq{9}\), \(0\leq{a}\leq{9}\).

(1) The tens digit of n is a factor of the units digit of n. This statement implies that \(a=kb\), (\(0\leq{k}\leq{4}\)) --> \(n=10b+a=10b+kb=b(10+k)\) --> as \(b\geq{2}\), \(n\) will always be composite and factor of \(b\). Sufficient

(2) The tens digit of n is 2. This statement implies that \(b=2\), but \(n\) can be for instance composite 25 or prime 29. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

chetan2u wrote:

A.. SI tells us that the tens digit is a factor of units digit so possible values of units digit are 4,6,8,9.....all would be even nos except no ending with digit 9, which will be 39... so all r composite.... SII.. no can be any of 21,22,23.....29..ie mix of composite and prime

Actually units digit of \(n\) can be any digit but 1, meaning that 0, 2, 3, 5, 7 too. And for 9: 99 also fits: eg . 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 22, 33, 55, 77, 99.

Hi ,

What about No. 71 . it is a prime number and 7 is factor of 1.

7 is not a factor of 1, 7 is a multiple of 1.
_________________

Re: An integer grater than 1 that is not prime is called [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Jul 2016, 03:38

Top Contributor

munishrattanpal wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

An integer grater than 1 that is not prime is called composite. If the two-digit integer n is greater than 20, is n composite?

Given: \(n>20\) --> two digit integer can be written as follows: \(n=10b+a>20\) --> \(2\leq{b}\leq{9}\), \(0\leq{a}\leq{9}\).

(1) The tens digit of n is a factor of the units digit of n. This statement implies that \(a=kb\), (\(0\leq{k}\leq{4}\)) --> \(n=10b+a=10b+kb=b(10+k)\) --> as \(b\geq{2}\), \(n\) will always be composite and factor of \(b\). Sufficient

(2) The tens digit of n is 2. This statement implies that \(b=2\), but \(n\) can be for instance composite 25 or prime 29. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

chetan2u wrote:

A.. SI tells us that the tens digit is a factor of units digit so possible values of units digit are 4,6,8,9.....all would be even nos except no ending with digit 9, which will be 39... so all r composite.... SII.. no can be any of 21,22,23.....29..ie mix of composite and prime

Actually units digit of \(n\) can be any digit but 1, meaning that 0, 2, 3, 5, 7 too. And for 9: 99 also fits: eg . 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 22, 33, 55, 77, 99.

Hi ,

What about No. 71 . it is a prime number and 7 is factor of 1.

1 is a factor of 7 but not other way around.
_________________

"I choose to rise after every fall" Target=770 http://challengemba.blogspot.com Kudos??

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...