Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 May 2013, 04:29
Customize  |  Hide

Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 235
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 60

Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in [#permalink] New post 20 Nov 2012, 06:29
00:00

Question Stats:

23% (02:02) correct 76% (00:48) wrong based on 0 sessions
Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in a job discrimination case must prove not only that the employer lied about the reasons for dismissal but also that those reasons were discriminatory, plaintiffs in such cases fear that they will have no higher court that they can appeal to when their cases are decided in lower courts.

(A) that they will have no higher court that they can appeal to when their cases are
(B) to which to appeal after their cases have been
(C) for appealing if their case has been
(D) to which they can appeal if their case is
(E) that their cases can appeal, if they have been

OA after some discussions.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Click kudos if my post helped.

Create a login and try 500+ questions for free - http://www.gmatpill.com/gmat-practice-test/

Amazing free video solutions for OG 12,13,quant review etc - http://www.gmatquantum.com/


Last edited by nelz007 on 20 Nov 2012, 08:19, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Oct 2011
Posts: 228
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, International Business
GMAT 1: 440 Q33 V13
GMAT 2: 0 Q0 V0
GPA: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 44

Re: Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in [#permalink] New post 20 Nov 2012, 06:48
nelz007 wrote:
Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in a job discrimination case must prove not only that the employer lied about the reasons for dismissal but also that those reasons were discriminatory, plaintiffs in such cases fear that they will have no higher court that they can appeal to when their cases are decided in lower courts.

(A) that they will have no higher court that they can appeal to when their cases are
(B) to which to appeal after their cases have been
(C) for appealing if their case has been
(D) to which they can appeal if their case is
(E) that their cases can appeal, if they have been

OA after some discussions.


IMO D

...... higher court to which they can appeal if their case is .....
higher court is noun to be modified....
they refers to employee...

Please correct if im wrong
_________________

GMAT - Practice, Patience, Persistence
Kudos if u like :)

1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 1982
Location: India
Followers: 129

Kudos [?]: 667 [1] , given: 170

GMAT Tests User
Re: Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in [#permalink] New post 20 Nov 2012, 07:44
1
This post received
KUDOS
First thing to note is that the plaintiffs have cases of their own and not a single common case.

A that they can appeal to when their cases are ------- The use of the present tense ‘are decided’ is not in appropriate since the appeals will be done well after the decision.

(B) to which to appeal after their cases have been ---- the best choice.


(C) for appealing if their case has been --- ‘their case’ is wrong
(D) To which they can appeal if their case is -----‘their case’ is wrong
(E) that their cases can appeal, if they have been --- absurd meaning saying that their cases can apple.

_________________

” I truly believe in online learning, I have been a student in both an Ivy League school (brick and mortar) and in an online setting and I have learned 1,000 times more in an online setting. You do not have anyone there lecturing you and then you do the work, online you are made to do it all yourself. Amazing how different the results are. - Heather(a student)”

Alicia Helle, an online student at the UW, "Obtaining my degree online has been a blessing. With two small children, I am able to work when it is convenient for my family and me. I have nothing but positive comments and experiences from my time at UW-Stout.”

Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates

Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 235
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 60

Re: Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in [#permalink] New post 20 Nov 2012, 08:20
To which to appeal sounds a bit awkward but grammatically its correct. OA is B.
_________________

Click kudos if my post helped.

Create a login and try 500+ questions for free - http://www.gmatpill.com/gmat-practice-test/

Amazing free video solutions for OG 12,13,quant review etc - http://www.gmatquantum.com/

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Posts: 285
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 243

Re: Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in [#permalink] New post 30 Nov 2012, 04:17
Whats wrong with A was debating between A and B
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 05 May 2011
Posts: 34
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GPA: 3.78
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 5

Re: Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in [#permalink] New post 02 Dec 2012, 21:36
Modified the original question, option A was incorrect in the original one.

nelz007 wrote:
Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in a job discrimination case must prove not only that the employer lied about the reasons for dismissal but also that those reasons were discriminatory, plaintiffs in such cases fear that they will have no higher court that they can appeal to when their cases are decided in lower courts.

(A) they can appeal to when their cases are
(B) to which to appeal after their cases have been
(C) for appealing if their case has been
(D) to which they can appeal if their case is
(E) that their cases can appeal, if they have been

OA after some discussions.


The trick is that the sentence refers to the plaintiffs, the initial clause is just filler.

So the meat of the sentence is, "Because the Supreme Court has ruled X, plaintiffs in such cases fear that THEY will have no higher court blah blah"

Therefore, the correct option should be in plural form, C & D are out.

E says "that their cases can appeal" that's wrong. The cases are not appealing, the plaintiffs are..

A starts off on the correct note but ends with "when their cases are". In this case the use of "have been" is warranted since we are talking about something that will have an impact on the present
Re: Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in   [#permalink] 02 Dec 2012, 21:36
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in tyagel 9 21 Oct 2004, 14:15
Popular new posts 1 Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in GK_Gmat 13 09 Jan 2008, 08:38
New posts 2 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC Q. Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution RohitKalla 9 06 Jul 2011, 13:39
New posts Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in mehulsayani 2 01 Sep 2012, 07:02
New posts 1 Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in Jp27 4 29 Oct 2012, 22:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.