Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 20:48 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 20:48

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Difficulty: 555-605 Levelx   Weakenx            
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 4384
Own Kudos [?]: 32879 [123]
Given Kudos: 4455
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 May 2014
Posts: 54
Own Kudos [?]: 344 [25]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT Date: 12-26-2014
GPA: 3
Send PM
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14823
Own Kudos [?]: 64924 [8]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
General Discussion
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Status:Retaking after 7 years
Posts: 860
Own Kudos [?]: 4468 [7]
Given Kudos: 221
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.75
Send PM
Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people [#permalink]
6
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Answer must be A.
D and E strengthen the argument.
A presents an alternate reason why the group of children gave random punishments. If it needs a high level of intellect to choose respective punishments, then the children were not capable enough to do so. We can't say that younger children do not regard people's intentions relevant to punishment. In other words A is an alternate cause.
C and B are nor relevant.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 181
Own Kudos [?]: 1330 [4]
Given Kudos: 63
Send PM
Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people [#permalink]
3
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people caused harm, some of those people doing so intentionally, and some accidentally. When asked about appropriate punishments for those who had caused harm, the younger children, unlike the older ones, assigned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally. Younger children, then, do not regard people's intentions as relevant to punishment.


I got A by POE

E is the trap answer
The younger children assigned punishments that varied according to the severity of the harm done by the agents in the stories.

we don't know the severity of the harm done we only have 2 options intentionally or accidentally.

Also if you use !A > B
if we negate A we can arrive at B

In interpreting these stories, the listeners had NOT drawn on a relatively mature sense of human psychology in order to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally

what happens if they are mature then they can use that as a basis for punishment.
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4347
Own Kudos [?]: 30797 [7]
Given Kudos: 635
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people [#permalink]
4
Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Hi,

I got a PM to respond to this question. Please find the response below:

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiaYX291uZU[/youtube]

Let me know if it helps.

-Rajat
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 225
Own Kudos [?]: 1372 [0]
Given Kudos: 16
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, General Management
GPA: 3.86
WE:Accounting (Commercial Banking)
Send PM
Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people [#permalink]
egmat wrote:
Hi,

I got a PM to respond to this question. Please find the response below:

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiaYX291uZU[/youtube]

Let me know if it helps.

-Rajat


I too marked A, But i am unable to rule out E. Can you please explain how you ruled out E?

My reasoning for E is

When the younger children assigned punishments that varied according to the severity of the harm done by the agents in the stories then the Younger children regard people’s intentions as relevant to punishment. so it might weaken the conclusion

Please correct me if i am wrong
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4347
Own Kudos [?]: 30797 [6]
Given Kudos: 635
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people [#permalink]
4
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Quote:
My reasoning for E is

When the younger children assigned punishments that varied according to the severity of the harm done by the agents in the stories then the Younger children regard people’s intentions as relevant to punishment. so it might weaken the conclusion

Please correct me if i am wrong


There is no relationship between severity of harm and intention. Lets say I hit someone while driving my car at 70 mph. The severity of harm would be the same whether I hit the person intentionally or by accident. Since there is no relationship between severity of harm in intention, this choice is OFS (out of scope)

S
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Apr 2014
Posts: 77
Own Kudos [?]: 277 [0]
Given Kudos: 1474
Send PM
Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people [#permalink]
Marcab wrote:
Answer must be A.
D and E strengthen the argument.
A presents an alternate reason why the group of children gave random punishments. If it needs a high level of intellect to choose respective punishments, then the children were not capable enough to do so. We can't say that younger children do not regard people's intentions relevant to punishment. In other words A is an alternate cause.
C and B are nor relevant.


Hi Marcab,
Can u please elaborate a lil more on A is weakening.What I can make out of it is that A says that since a high level of intellect is needed, younger kids are unable to decide on punishment, hence its supporting the argument! Please guide.
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 25 Apr 2012
Posts: 531
Own Kudos [?]: 2284 [2]
Given Kudos: 740
Location: India
GPA: 3.21
WE:Business Development (Other)
Send PM
Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
carcass wrote:
A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people caused harm, some of those people doing so intentionally, and some accidentally. When asked about appropriate punishments for those who had caused harm, the younger children, unlike the older ones, assigned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally. Younger children, then, do not regard people's intentions as relevant to punishment.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion above?

In interpreting these stories, the listeners had to draw on a relatively mature sense of human psychology in order to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally.

In these stories, the severity of the harm produced was clearly stated.

Younger children are as likely to produce harm unintentionally as are older children.

The older children assigned punishment in a way that closely resembled the way adults had assigned punishment in a similar experiment.

The younger children assigned punishments that varied according to the severity of the harm done by the agents in the stories.



Good Question+1
Gmatprep questions are just awesome...

Clearly this is a Weaken question and the conclusion is that Younger children do not consider intent (whether accidental or intentional) of people while deciding a punishment..and why is that? Because the study showed that Younger people gave same punishment whether person's intent was accidental or intentional..

Gap in Logic : Younger children do not regard intent of the people (In Conclusion) where as facts presented tells about same punishment was given by younger people..irrespective of intent

A gives you the logic that it is not that younger children do not consider intent of the doer but just that they don't have enough knowledge to differentiate between harm produced intentionally or accidentally.. and thus an alternate reason for giving the same punishment..

For a weaken question...always consider the argument to be weak(When you are reading) and before going to answer try come with an answer on your own...Picking the correct answer choice becomes easier thereafter...
Director
Director
Joined: 06 Jan 2015
Posts: 738
Own Kudos [?]: 1586 [0]
Given Kudos: 579
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GPA: 3.35
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people [#permalink]
carcass wrote:
A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people caused harm, some of those people doing so intentionally, and some accidentally. When asked about appropriate punishments for those who had caused harm, the younger children, unlike the older ones, assigned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally. Younger children, then, do not regard people's intentions as relevant to punishment.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion above?

(A) In interpreting these stories, the listeners had to draw on a relatively mature sense of human psychology in order to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally.

(B) In these stories, the severity of the harm produced was clearly stated. --> irrelevant

(C) Younger children are as likely to produce harm unintentionally as are older children. --> we are not bothered about children are as likely to produce harm unintentionally

(D) The older children assigned punishment in a way that closely resembled the way adults had assigned punishment in a similar experiment. --> resemblance is out of scope

(E) The younger children assigned punishments that varied according to the severity of the harm done by the agents in the stories. --> severity out of scope



HI GMATNinja, mikemcgarry, DmitryFarber, MagooshExpert (Carolyn), ccooley, GMATGuruNY, EMPOWERgmatVerbal, EducationAisle

I'm unable to comprehend how A weakens the argument. Can you please help me with my reasoning?
Tutor
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Posts: 1315
Own Kudos [?]: 3136 [3]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Send PM
Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
NandishSS wrote:
carcass wrote:
A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people caused harm, some of those people doing so intentionally, and some accidentally. When asked about appropriate punishments for those who had caused harm, the younger children, unlike the older ones, assigned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally. Younger children, then, do not regard people's intentions as relevant to punishment.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion above?

(A) In interpreting these stories, the listeners had to draw on a relatively mature sense of human psychology in order to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally.

(B) In these stories, the severity of the harm produced was clearly stated.

(C) Younger children are as likely to produce harm unintentionally as are older children.

(D) The older children assigned punishment in a way that closely resembled the way adults had assigned punishment in a similar experiment.

(E) The younger children assigned punishments that varied according to the severity of the harm done by the agents in the stories.


Premise:
Younger children assigned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally.
Conclusion:
Younger children do not regard people's intentions as relevant to punishment.

A: In interpreting these stories, the listeners had to draw on a relatively mature sense of human psychology in order to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally.
Implication:
The YOUNGER children assigned unvarying punishments NOT because they considered intention unimportant but because they lacked the MATURITY to discern whether the harm in the stories was produced intentionally -- WEAKENING the conclusion that younger people do not regard intention as relevant.

VP
VP
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Posts: 1115
Own Kudos [?]: 2164 [0]
Given Kudos: 368
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 6: 710 Q47 V41
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people [#permalink]
The argument is that Young kids don't regard INTENTIONS as relevant to punishment.
This is supported by a study.

We are asked to weaken this claim.

A does this - the conclusion assumes that younger kids have the same maturity as older kids i.e. that there is no other reason for the younger kids to conclude the way they did, so if younger kids actually require a more mature sense of psychology to IDENTIFY INTENTIONS in the first place then we cannot reliably conclude that the regarded INTENTIONS at all.

B - this does not affect the conclusion. It merely tells us the study was undertaken clearly.
C - irrelevant. The argument is about identifying, not producing harm.
D - tells us something about older kids - nothing to do with the argument.
E - lures you by tricking you into thinking that because the kids were able to assign punishments based on severity of harm that they actually had regard. This is false. The argument is concerned with "Regard for INTENTIONS (malicious/ accidental) not regard for severity of harm. The younger kids could have no regard for intentions but regard for severity or both.
VP
VP
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Posts: 1262
Own Kudos [?]: 201 [0]
Given Kudos: 332
Send PM
Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people [#permalink]
A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people caused harm, some of those people doing so intentionally, and some accidentally. When asked about appropriate punishments for those who had caused harm, the younger children, unlike the older ones, assigned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally. Younger children, then, do not regard people's intentions as relevant to punishment.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion above?


(A) In interpreting these stories, the listeners had to draw on a relatively mature sense of human psychology in order to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally. CORRECT

The author concludes that YOUNG children specifically do not consider/regard people’s intentions as relevant to the punishment on the basis of an observation that children assign punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally. This choice tells us that maybe the listeners have it all wrong and that children DO in fact care about intentions, but the issue is that the listeners were unable to detect this because of the method that they were using.

(B) In these stories, the severity of the harm produced was clearly stated. X

OK, but this doesn’t address the extant concerns about intention

(C) Younger children are as likely to produce harm unintentionally as are older children. X

This is a needless comparison

(D) The older children assigned punishment in a way that closely resembled the way adults had assigned punishment in a similar experiment.X

We need to keep the attention on younger children!

(E) The younger children assigned punishments that varied according to the severity of the harm done by the agents in the stories. X

OK great, but what about intentions!!
Intern
Intern
Joined: 20 Oct 2020
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Send PM
Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people [#permalink]
the question states the children of various ages "read" the stories but option A says "listeners" does that make any difference? VeritasKarishma
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 May 2020
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [0]
Given Kudos: 25
GPA: 3.72
Send PM
Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people [#permalink]
Tough question imo.

Question analysis: WA. Conclusion stated in the last line.
BE was addressed in the argument so out
CD not relevant out
A is the last man standing
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Posts: 4946
Own Kudos [?]: 7627 [1]
Given Kudos: 215
Location: India
Send PM
Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Top Contributor
A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people caused harm, some of those people doing so intentionally, and some accidentally. When asked about appropriate punishments for those who had caused harm, the younger children, unlike the older ones, assigned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally. Younger children, then, do not regard people's intentions as relevant to punishment.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion above?

Question Type: Weaken the Argument

Conclusion: Younger children do not regard people's intentions as relevant to punishment. This is why assigned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally.

Task at hand: Find an option that shows that not regarding people's intentions as relevant to punishment is not necessarily the reason punishments did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally.

A. In interpreting these stories, the listeners had to draw on a relatively mature sense of human psychology in order to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally. This option shows that it was not any judgement based on the relevance that caused the punishments not to vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally. It just might be that the children lacked the mature sense of human psychology that would have been needed for them to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally.

B. In these stories, the severity of the harm produced was clearly stated. Maybe but this does not tell us anything about the younger children's judgement about the intention to cause harm.

C. Younger children are as likely to produce harm unintentionally as are older children. Whether these children produce harm or not is not the issue here.

D. The older children assigned punishment in a way that closely resembled the way adults had assigned punishment in a similar experiment. What the older children did cannot weaken what the younger children did.

E. The younger children assigned punishments that varied according to the severity of the harm done by the agents in the stories. This may be how the children assigned punishment. Presenting the way in which the children actually assigned punishment will not weaken the fact that there was no variation in punishment because younger children do not regard people's intentions as relevant to punishment.

- Nitha Jay
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17223
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne