Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Oct 2014, 18:25

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
4 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Posts: 606
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 43 [4] , given: 0

Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their [#permalink] New post 02 Sep 2004, 05:14
4
This post received
KUDOS
23
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients' misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.
(A) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy
(B) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food
(C) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food
(D) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
(E) in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior

Last edited by saurya_s on 21 Jun 2005, 13:10, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 121
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 23

Re: Defense Attorney [#permalink] New post 04 Aug 2009, 05:32
abgo wrote:
Defense Attorneys have occasionally argued that their client's misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.

a) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy
b) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food
c) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food
d) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
e)in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior



I think this is OG 10 question..IMO B
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 3

Re: Defense Attorney [#permalink] New post 04 Aug 2009, 05:56
apoorvasrivastva,

Could you provide explanation for your answer.

Thanks,
abgo
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 121
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 23

Re: Defense Attorney [#permalink] New post 04 Aug 2009, 06:11
Defense Attorneys have occasionally argued that their client's misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.

a) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy
b) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food
c) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food
d) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
e)in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior

In choices A, C, and E, "in attributing ... behavior modifies the perpetrators", producing the illogical statement that the perpetrators rather than the defense attorneys are attributing behavior to food allergies.

B and D by using "If" and " is attributed " (a passive construction ) correct the modifier issue by nullifying the fact the perpetrators are the doers of the action!!!

Usage of passive suggests that someone else is doing the action rather that perpetrators...:)

hth
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Jul 2009
Posts: 41
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 1

Re: Defense Attorney [#permalink] New post 04 Aug 2009, 06:29
a) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy - not || to 'perpetrators are told'
b) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food -correct
c) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food - not || and wordy

d) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior - not ||
e)in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior - not ||
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 3

Re: Defense Attorney [#permalink] New post 04 Aug 2009, 07:04
OA is B. The way OG explains is that the phrase modifies the perpetrators illogically and idiom attributed to x to y should be used. I was not able to wrap my head around the correct answer. Subject of the sentence is Defense attorney. Perpetrators acts as direct object. So according the to your suggestion (apoorvasrivastva), the passive phrase correctly relates to them.

Thanks!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2009
Posts: 71
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 2

Re: Defense Attorney [#permalink] New post 09 Aug 2009, 00:16
"attribute" always confuses me. Thank you for clear explanation :)
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2009
Posts: 84
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 1

Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their [#permalink] New post 31 Aug 2009, 02:32
235. Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients’ misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.
(A) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy
(B) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food
(C) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food
(D) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
(E) in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
_________________

Consider kudos for good post.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 Sep 2009
Posts: 13
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their [#permalink] New post 30 Sep 2009, 12:07
Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients’ misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.
(A) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy
(B) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food
(C) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food
(D) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
(E) in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
[Reveal] Spoiler:
the answer is B

Can some please explain how they got this answer? I tried reading the explanation in the book and I'm still lost. Thanks.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 May 2009
Posts: 136
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 48

Re: MGMAT SC a question about logical predication [#permalink] New post 30 Sep 2009, 22:15
Attribute X(an effect ) to Y(a cause). correct idiomatic usage D & E are out


in attributing behavior is wrong in A & C it modifies the perpetrators

so B is the winner
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Posts: 119
Location: Mumbai
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 3

power prep [#permalink] New post 05 Jun 2010, 04:20
Attachment:
powerprep sc1.jpg
powerprep sc1.jpg [ 52.24 KiB | Viewed 1088 times ]


[Reveal] Spoiler:
b
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 995
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 419 [0], given: 36

Re: Defense Attorney [#permalink] New post 05 Jun 2010, 08:07
Defense Attorneys have occasionally argued that their client's misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.

a) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy
b) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food
c) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food
d) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
e)in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior

D and E can be eliminated since "attributed as" is WRONG IDIOM

Among A/B/C

A and C : will actually modify "the perpetrators"

E.g Running down the road, a brick hit my head. "Running down the road" modifies brick

Its not the perpetrators who can argue but the Defense Attorneys

B it is.
_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Director
Director
avatar
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 995
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 419 [0], given: 36

Re: power prep [#permalink] New post 05 Jun 2010, 08:10
Defense Attorneys have occasionally argued that their client's misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.

a) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy
b) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food
c) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food
d) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
e)in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior

D and E can be eliminated since "attributed as" is WRONG IDIOM

Among A/B/C

A and C : will actually modify "the perpetrators"

E.g Running down the road, a brick hit my head. "Running down the road" modifies brick

Its not the perpetrators who can argue but the Defense Attorneys

B it is.
_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 278 [0], given: 2

Re: Defense attorneys have occasionally argued [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2010, 03:26
Could anybody elaborate?
Thanks
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

3 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1560
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 224 [3] , given: 6

Re: Defense attorneys have occasionally argued [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2010, 12:23
3
This post received
KUDOS
I also got the OA wrong. However, after reading the sentence several times I think I understood what the it is trying to say.

Lets break the sentence in 2 parts.

Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients’ misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested.

If criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food then the perpetrators [culprits] are told that they are not responsible for their actions.

Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients’ misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.

(A) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy --> this modifier should modify 'attorneys' not 'perpetrators'
(B) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food --> this is saying that if criminal behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food then the culprits are told that they are not responsible for their actions. Also, 'attributed to' is the correct idiom.
(C) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food --> same as A
(D) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior --> wrong idiom
(E) in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior --> same as A
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 995
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 419 [0], given: 36

Re: Defense attorneys have occasionally argued [#permalink] New post 25 Jul 2010, 22:11
Looks like you did a hell of research LOL.

Catherine wrote:
When a person is driving or is in actual physical control of a vehicle within this state and is under the influence of alcoholic beverages, any chemical substance, when affected to the extent that the person's normal faculties are impaired; has a blood or breath-alcohol level of 0.08 or more.
A DUI charge is very serious. Driving under the influence is a severe crime in every state. The consequences of a conviction are life-altering. If you don't seek professional DUI lawyers to protect your rights, You may face:
• Jail time
• Job loss
• Loss of driver's license
• Insurance coverage complications
• Impoundment of vehicle
• Ignition interlock device
• Probation
• Community service
• Alcohol education/treatment/assessment
• Restricted interstate or international travel

_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Director
Director
avatar
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 995
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 419 [0], given: 36

Re: Defense attorneys have occasionally argued [#permalink] New post 25 Jul 2010, 22:16
attribute to is the Idiom. D uses attributed as OUT

B is correct.
A, C and E : "in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy" ----> this modifies the perpetrators. Which changes the meaning of the sentence.
Perpetrator cannot ague in the case - attorney can.

gmataspirant2009 wrote:
235. Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients’ misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.
(A) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy
(B) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food
(C) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food
(D) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
(E) in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior

_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Jun 2010
Posts: 40
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 7

Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their [#permalink] New post 04 Oct 2010, 02:39
Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients' misconduct stemmed from a reaction to
something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.

(A) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy
(B) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food
110
(C) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food
(D) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
(E) in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior

I spotted right answer as B because of right idiom attributed ...to , but couldnt understand why other options are wrong ?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Apr 2010
Posts: 238
Location: Hyderabad
WE 1: 4.6 years Exp IT prof
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 38

Re: Defense attorneys [#permalink] New post 04 Oct 2010, 12:00
What is the Source of this question...???
_________________

I will give a Fight till the End

"To dream anything that you want to dream, that is the beauty of the human mind. To do anything that you want to do, that is the strength of the human will. To trust yourself, to test your limits, that is the courage to succeed."
- Bernard Edmonds

A person who is afraid of Failure can never succeed -- Amneet Padda

Don't Forget to give the KUDOS

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Dec 2009
Posts: 33
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 2

Re: Defense attorneys [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2010, 14:15
"Some food allergy" incorrect.

Hence ANS (B)
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Affiliations: Veritas Prep
Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Posts: 13
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Re: Defense attorneys [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2010, 17:23
A) is wrong because of a modifier error. The perpetrators are not attributing their own behavior to a food allergy. Their defense attorneys are making that claim.

C) is wrong for a similar reason. It has the additional problem of wordiness. There’s no need to say “behavior that is criminal or delinquent” when you could just say “criminal or delinquent behavior.”

D) and E) are wrong because of an incorrect idiom. Never say “attributed as.” Something can only be “attributed to” someone or something.
_________________

Mimi

Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Save 10% on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting
For a limited time, receive access to five Veritas Prep Computer Adaptive practice tests when you purchase a Veritas Prep GMAT book! Buy Now!
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Re: Defense attorneys   [#permalink] 05 Oct 2010, 17:23
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their goalsnr 0 14 Jul 2008, 10:34
Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their mymba99 0 03 Jun 2008, 14:55
Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their tarek99 0 12 Jan 2008, 08:05
Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their vshaunak@gmail.com 0 17 May 2007, 12:01
Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their saurya_s 0 03 May 2005, 04:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4   5   6    Next  [ 116 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.