Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Jul 2014, 22:22

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Aug 2006
Posts: 222
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents [#permalink] New post 03 Jun 2007, 00:10
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents whose children attend private schools maintain that people making no use of a government service should not be forced to pay for it. Yet those who choose to buy bottled water rather than drink water from the local supply are not therefore exempt from paying taxes to maintain the local water supply.
Roger: Your argument is illogical. Children are required by law to attend school. Since school attendance is a matter not of choice, but of legal requirement, it is unfair for the government to force some parents to pay for it twice.

Which of the following responses by Gloria would best refute Roger’s charge that her argument is illogical?

(A) Although drinking water is not required by law, it is necessary for all people, and therefore my analogy is appropriate.

(B) Those who can afford the tuition at a high-priced private school can well bear the same tax burden as those whose children attend public schools.

(C) If tuition tax credits are granted, the tax burden on parents who choose public schools will rise to an intolerable level.

(D) The law does not say that parents must send their children to private schools, only that the children must attend some kind of school, whether public or private.

(E) Both bottled water and private schools are luxury items, and it is unfair that some citizens should be able to afford them while others cannot.

Explanation please..
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 308
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 03 Jun 2007, 08:13
D.
  [#permalink] 03 Jun 2007, 08:13
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents BlueRobin 9 28 May 2010, 03:59
Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents prasun84 9 14 Nov 2008, 01:37
Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents beckee529 3 27 Jul 2007, 18:10
Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents leeye84 1 16 Mar 2007, 14:18
Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents gmataquaguy 7 31 Jul 2004, 18:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Gloria: Those who advocate tuition tax credits for parents

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.