Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 13 Jul 2014, 02:38

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Gortland has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 83
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [1] , given: 0

Gortland has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both [#permalink] New post 23 Apr 2005, 22:58
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

80% (02:04) correct 19% (01:30) wrong based on 94 sessions
Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition

Practice Question
Question No.: 56
Page: 139
Difficulty:


Gortland has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both grain and meat. However, as per capita income in Gortland has risen toward the world average, per capita consumption of meat has also risen toward the world average, and it takes several pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat. Therefore, since per capita income continues to rise, whereas domestic grain production will not increase, Gortland will soon have to import either grain or meat or both.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A: The total acreage devoted to grain production in Gortland will not decrease substantially.
B: The population of Gortland has remained relatively constant during the country's years of growing prosperity.
C: The per capita consumption of meat in Gortland is roughly the same across all income levels.
D: In Gortland, neither meat nor grain is subject to government price controls.
E: People in Gortland who increase their consumption of meat will not radically decrease their consumption of grain.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Best regards,


Last edited by Narenn on 07 Oct 2013, 08:30, edited 2 times in total.
Necessary Corrections for Official Guide Verbal Review 2nd Edition Project
Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesManhattan GMAT Discount Codes
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Posts: 265
Location: sydney
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 23 Apr 2005, 23:15
E.

if consumption of grain remains same, there will not be additional grain to produce meat. argument holds.
_________________

When u r about to make ends meet, someone moves the ends.

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1226
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 24 Apr 2005, 05:53
How to refute B.

If the population of Gortland has decreased, then the total consumption will decrease and Gortland will not have to import either grain or meat or both.


:oops:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2004
Posts: 905
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 24 Apr 2005, 09:56
Agree with (E).

chunjuwu wrote:
How to refute B.


even though population is constant, its per capita will keep on increasing(as per eveidence). This assumption has no effect on the argument.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Posts: 265
Location: sydney
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 24 Apr 2005, 18:57
B says that population remains constant. but argument states that per capita income is rising so is consumption of grain and meat. even if population decrease, per capita income may rise to such an extent that it it offsets amount consumed by decreased population.
_________________

When u r about to make ends meet, someone moves the ends.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 83
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 27 Apr 2005, 04:12
The OA is (E). Thank you.
_________________

Best regards,

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 83
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 27 Apr 2005, 04:12
The OA is (E). Thank you.
_________________

Best regards,

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Posts: 112
Location: Where you mind is
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [1] , given: 0

Gortland has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both [#permalink] New post 18 Jan 2007, 03:24
1
This post received
KUDOS
Gortland has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both grain and meat. However, as per capita income in Gortland has risen toward the world average, per capita consumption of meat has also risen toward the world average, and it takes several pounds of grains to produce one pound of meat. Therefore, since per capita income continues to rise, whereas domestic grain production will not increase, Gortland will soon have to import either grain or meat or both.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The total acreage devoted to grain production in Gortlnad will not decrease substantially
(B) The population of Gortland has remained relatively constant during the country’s years of growing prosperity
(C) The per capita consumption of meat in Gortland is roughly the same across all income levels
(D) In Gortland, neither meat nor grain is subject to government price controls
(E) People in Gortland who increase their consumption of meat will not radically decrease their consumption of grain

Last edited by Zarrolou on 28 Jul 2013, 01:08, edited 2 times in total.
Added OA.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 256
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Gortland has long been self -sufficient in both grain and [#permalink] New post 06 Apr 2007, 00:12
Gortland has long been self -sufficient in both grain and meat.However, as per capita income in Gortland has risen toward the world average, per capita consumption of meat has also risen toward the world average, and it takes several pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat. Therefore, since per capita income continues to rise, whereas domestic grain production will not increase, Gortland will soon have to import either grain or meat or both.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

a) The total acreage devoted to grain production in Gortland will soon decrease.

b) Importing either grain or meat will not result in a significantly higher percentage of Gortlander's incomes being spent on food than is currently the case.

c) The per capita consumption of meat in Gortland is increaing at roughly the same rate across all income levels.

d) The per capita income of meat producers in Gortland is rising faster than the per capita income of grain producers.

e) People in Gortland who increase their consumption of meat will not radically decrease their consumption of grain.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Posts: 360
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 06 Apr 2007, 05:49
E.

a) The total acreage devoted to grain production in Gortland will soon decrease.
- Decrease in production of grain is not mentioned.

b) Importing either grain or meat will not result in a significantly higher percentage of Gortlander's incomes being spent on food than is currently the case.
- proportion of expenditure on food in income is not mentioned.

c) The per capita consumption of meat in Gortland is increaing at roughly the same rate across all income levels.
- "same rate" is irrelevant.

d) The per capita income of meat producers in Gortland is rising faster than the per capita income of grain producers.
- irrelevant

e) People in Gortland who increase their consumption of meat will not radically decrease their consumption of grain.
- Yes, since ppl will not radically decrease their consumption of grain, Gortland may have to import grain.


:)
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 02 Apr 2007
Posts: 33
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Apr 2007, 06:14
Yes. E is the answer. Negation works here.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 115
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Apr 2007, 06:35
E.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2006
Posts: 215
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 06 Apr 2007, 21:24
E is the answer. If the meat consumption increases, the grain consumption should come down, which will offset partially the production of meat. But if it doesn't happen, then the import becomes necessary
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 754
Location: Dallas, Texas
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 07 Apr 2007, 22:47
E !
_________________

"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 256
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 09 Apr 2007, 19:13
OA is E
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 198
Location: California
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Gortland [#permalink] New post 09 Apr 2007, 20:41
faifai0714 wrote:
Gortland has long been self -sufficient in both grain and meat.However, as per capita income in Gortland has risen toward the world average, per capita consumption of meat has also risen toward the world average, and it takes several pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat. Therefore, since per capita income continues to rise, whereas domestic grain production will not increase, Gortland will soon have to import either grain or meat or both.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

a) The total acreage devoted to grain production in Gortland will soon decrease.

b) Importing either grain or meat will not result in a significantly higher percentage of Gortlander's incomes being spent on food than is currently the case.

c) The per capita consumption of meat in Gortland is increaing at roughly the same rate across all income levels.

d) The per capita income of meat producers in Gortland is rising faster than the per capita income of grain producers.

e) People in Gortland who increase their consumption of meat will not radically decrease their consumption of grain.


another E
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Mar 2007
Posts: 177
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Apr 2007, 11:14
another E
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 592
Location: Kuwait
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 138 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 10 Apr 2007, 11:22
Most answers are either out-of-scope or are not really an assumption made to derive to the conclusion, except E.

Prod: production, Cons: consumption

Must be: Grain Prod + Meat Prod = Meat Cons + Grain Cons
Grain Prod : SAME
Grain Cons: NO IDEA
Meat Prod: SAME
Meat Cons: UP

In order for the equation to be valid, grain consumption must decrease. Since the author suggest importing grain or meat or both, then he must've assumed that grain consumption will not decrease to balance the equation of production and consumption.

ANSWER: E
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3405
Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 149 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Gortland has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both [#permalink] New post 09 Sep 2007, 09:20
Gortland has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both grain and meat. However, as per capita income in Gortland has risen toward the world average, per capita consumption of meat has also risen toward the world average, and it takes several pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat. Therefore, since per capita income continues to rise, whereas domestic grain production will not increase, Gortland will soon have to import either grain or meat or both.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) The total acreage devoted to grain production in Gortland will not decrease substantially.
(B) The population of Gortland has remained relatively constant during the country’s years of growing prosperity.
(C) The per capita consumption of meat in Gortland is roughly the same across all income levels.
(D) In Gortland, neither meat nor grain is subject to government price controls.
(E) People in Gortland who increase their consumption of meat will not radically decrease their consumption of grain.


This question is from OG...

My issue is that in E..if the populate were to decrese, per capita income would still go up, and so would per capita consumption of meat...but if thats the case..there will still be sufficient grain ..since NET demand is falling..

I am not sure why B is wrong...

any takers?
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 658
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 51

GMAT Tests User
Gortland has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both [#permalink] New post 12 May 2011, 07:29
Gortland has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both grain and meat. However, as per capita income in
Gortland has risen toward the world average, per capita consumption of meat has also risen toward the world
average, and it takes several pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat. Therefore, since per capita income
continues to rise, whereas domestic grain production will not increase, Gortland will soon have to import either
grain or meat or both.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A) The total acreage devoted to grain production in Gortland will not decrease substantially.
(B) The population of Gortland has remained relatively constant during the country’s years of growing
prosperity.
(C) The per capita consumption of meat in Gortland is roughly the same across all income levels.
(D) In Gortland, neither meat nor grain is subject to government price controls.
(E) People in Gortland who increase their consumption of meat will not radically decrease their consumption of
grain.

oa after discussion , please post your timing too.
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Gortland has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both   [#permalink] 12 May 2011, 07:29
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Gortland has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both maybeam 0 19 Jul 2012, 12:26
Gortland has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both garimavyas 0 19 May 2012, 19:46
Gortland has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both FN 0 08 Feb 2013, 22:50
Gortland has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both Hang Tuah 0 16 Aug 2013, 08:17
Gortland has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both qhoc0010 15 23 Dec 2004, 10:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Gortland has long been narrowly self-sufficient in both

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 41 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.