Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 14:53 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 14:53

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 Feb 2012
Posts: 33
Own Kudos [?]: 327 [8]
Given Kudos: 41
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V31
GPA: 3.45
WE:Marketing (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92948
Own Kudos [?]: 619233 [2]
Given Kudos: 81609
Send PM
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 4386
Own Kudos [?]: 32883 [0]
Given Kudos: 4455
Send PM
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92948
Own Kudos [?]: 619233 [1]
Given Kudos: 81609
Send PM
Re: If n and k are integers and (-2)n^5 > 0, is k^37 < 0? [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
carcass wrote:
Bunuel I find this question on the net.......I would like to know if you think that is a good question and if it is elaborate in a good manner.

It is important to practice. :)

Thanks


Though the question is testing basic concepts usual for the GMAT, I still wouldn't call that question very elegant.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Feb 2013
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: If n and k are integers and (-2)n^5 > 0, is k^37 < 0? [#permalink]
What about the possibility that Z is equal to 0. In that case 1) would be insufficient.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Posts: 485
Own Kudos [?]: 3093 [0]
Given Kudos: 141
Send PM
Re: If n and k are integers and (-2)n^5 > 0, is k^37 < 0? [#permalink]
thekid1998 wrote:
What about the possibility that Z is equal to 0. In that case 1) would be insufficient.

Z can't be zero as it is mentioned that z is not divisible by 2.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Feb 2013
Status:Currently Preparing the GMAT
Posts: 25
Own Kudos [?]: 58 [0]
Given Kudos: 11
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 550 Q47 V23
GPA: 3.7
WE:Analyst (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: If n and k are integers and (-2)n^5 > 0, is k^37 < 0? [#permalink]
Another great DS problem that helps pinpoint the need to stay alert at the sign of the base of the exponent and whether the power itself is odd or even.

Let's begin by understanding the problem.

We have \(-2*(n)^5 > 0\). Since the power is odd and the end result is positive despite multiplying the expression \(n^5\) by (-2), then this states that n is negative.
So we want to see whether \(k^(37)<0\), which is translated to : is k negative ? since 37 is an odd number !

Statement 1 : \((nk)^z > 0\), where z is an integer that is not divisible by two

Since z is odd and the expression is positive, we can assume that the base, nk, is positive. And seeing as n is negative, we can say that k is also negative. And since 37 is an odd power, then \(k^(37)\) is negative. So statement 1 is sufficient.

Statement 2 : \(k < n\)

Since n is negative, it naturally follows that k is also negative. And since 37 is an odd power, then \(k^(37)\) is negative. So statement 2 is sufficient.

The correct answer is, therefore, D !

Hope that helped :-D .
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Oct 2018
Posts: 57
Own Kudos [?]: 71 [1]
Given Kudos: 62
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Brand Management (Health Care)
Send PM
If n and k are integers and (-2)n5 > 0, is k37 < 0? (nk)z > 0, where z [#permalink]
1
Kudos
UB001 wrote:
If n and k are integers and (-2)n^5 > 0, is k^37 < 0?

1. (nk)^z > 0, where z is an integer that is not divisible by two
2. k < n


Analysing question stem
(-2)n^5 > 0...means 'n' is negative because only then the product of -2 and n will be positive integer...and the sign of integer raised to odd power will be same as sign of the integer.

So n < 0 .....(A)

Find:
k^37 < 0?
That is, Is k < 0?

Statement 1:
(nk)^z > 0 ...and z is odd.
That is... Product of negative "n" and "k" raised to odd integer "z" is positive.
This is possible only when k is negative, because only then the product n*k will pe positive...and (n*k)^odd integer will be greater than 0.
Hence, sufficient.

Statement 2:
k < n
Since 'n is less than 0 (from question stem analysis), k is also less than 0.
Hence k^37 < 0
Sufficient

Ans: D
Director
Director
Joined: 09 Mar 2018
Posts: 783
Own Kudos [?]: 453 [1]
Given Kudos: 123
Location: India
Send PM
Re: If n and k are integers and (-2)n5 > 0, is k37 < 0? (nk)z > 0, where z [#permalink]
1
Kudos
UB001 wrote:
If n and k are integers and (-2)n^5 > 0, is k^37 < 0?

1. (nk)^z > 0, where z is an integer that is not divisible by two
2. k < n


So, before solving the question, lets brain storm over it a bit

If n and k are integers and (-2)n^5 > 0
That will imply that n will be -ive
(-2) * (-I)^5 will only give something > 0

Statement (1)
(nk)^z > 0, where z is an integer that is not divisible by two
z will be 1,3,5,7
here k will be - ive, (-n* -k)^Odd Integer, will give something > 0

When value of k^37 < 0, is put back in the question, it will be sufficient.

Statement (2)
k < n, Since n is -ive
k will be -ive

(-ive k)^ 37 < 0, will always be less than 0, it will be sufficient


Answer D
GMAT Club Bot
Re: If n and k are integers and (-2)n5 > 0, is k37 < 0? (nk)z > 0, where z [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92948 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne