Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: gmat prep absolute values [#permalink]
17 Nov 2009, 05:28

4

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

Basically the question asks whether the distance between the two points x and y on the line is greater than the difference between the individual distances of x and y from 0.

|x-y|>|x|-|y|?

(1) y<x, 3 possible cases for |x-y|>|x|-|y|:

A. ---------------0---y---x---, 0<y<x --> in this case |x-y|>|x|-|y| becomes: x-y>x-y --> 0>0. Which is wrong; B. ---------y---0---------x---, y<0<x --> in this case |x-y|>|x|-|y| becomes: x-y>x+y --> y<0. Which is right, as we consider the range y<0<x; C. ---y---x---0--------------, y<x<0 --> in this case |x-y|>|x|-|y| becomes: x-y>-x+y --> x>y. Which is right, as we consider the range y<0<x.

Two different answers. Not sufficient.

(2) xy<0, means x and y have different signs, hence 2 cases for |x-y|>|x|-|y|:

A. ----y-----0-------x---, y<0<x --> in this case |x-y|>|x|-|y| becomes: x-y>x+y --> y<0. Which is right, as we consider the range y<0<x; B. ----x-----0-------y---, x<0<y --> in this case |x-y|>|x|-|y| becomes: -x+y>-x-y --> y>0. Which is right, as we consider the range x<0<y.

1) if y<x Case I: x<0 => y<0 --> LHS = RHS Case II: x>0, y>0 but <x --> LHS = RHS Case III: x>0, y<0 --> LHS > RHS Hence 1) alone is not sufficient

2) if x*y <0 => either x or y <0 and other has to be >0 Case I: x<0, y>0 --> LHS > RHS Cae II: x>0, y<0 --> LHS > RHS No other case. Hence, 2) alone is sufficient

Re: DS-Mode Inequality [#permalink]
11 May 2010, 13:32

is lx-yl > lxl - lyl ?

1. y<x

2. xy<o

So the only way that the absolute value of x-y is greater than the absolute value of x minus the absolute value of y could be true is if one or both is a negative number. Which one? Y i think. For example if x was 6 and y was -3. The left side would be l6--3l and the right l6l-l3l. Soto be true. it seems y should be negative. the firs statement says that y is less than x. Not sufficient to determine the initial question. If y is less than x but still positive the two sides are equal.

Second statement xy is less than o. This tells us that one number (x or y) is negative but not which one. Could this still be determinative? by itself no. but coupled with statement one we can say that x is positive and y is negative. In all such situations is the above question true. let's try x=4, y=-20. the right side l4--20l=24, the left side l4l-l20l= -16. Yes!

So I think both are needed. I have no idea how quick you were at solving this.

Okay so my analysis(as quoted below) on this question is wrong. Number two is sufficient. I see now that if either x or y is negative the right side will be greater.

is lx-yl > lxl - lyl ?

1. y<x

2. xy<o

So the only way that the absolute value of x-y is greater than the absolute value of x minus the absolute value of y could be true is if one or both is a negative number. Which one? Y i think. For example if x was 6 and y was -3. The left side would be l6--3l and the right l6l-l3l. Soto be true. it seems y should be negative. the firs statement says that y is less than x. Not sufficient to determine the initial question. If y is less than x but still positive the two sides are equal.

This is incorrectSecond statement xy is less than o. This tells us that one number (x or y) is negative but not which one. Could this still be determinative? by itself no. but coupled with statement one we can say that x is positive and y is negative. In all such situations is the above question true. let's try x=4, y=-20. the right side l4--20l=24, the left side l4l-l20l= -16. Yes!

So I think both are needed. I have no idea how quick you were at solving this.

BRAVO!!! skipjames BRAVO!!!! Some times when you look at any answer, your mind stops working its own way and start to accept what is stated. 1 kudo for you!! Can some body tell me how to give kudo?

Re: DS-Mode Inequality [#permalink]
12 May 2010, 00:35

Expert's post

LM wrote:

Please tell the quick approach.... it took me loner than I should have taken....

Algebraic approach is given in my first post. Below is another approach:

|x-y|>|x|-|y|?

(1) y<x

Try two positive number x=3>y=1 --> is |3-1|>|3|-|1|? --> is 2>2? Answer NO.

Try ANY other case but both positive: x=-5>y=-7 --> is |-5-(-7)|>|-5|-|-7|? --> is 2>-2? Answer YES.

Two different answers. Not sufficient.

(2) xy<0, means x and y have different signs.

Now we can spot here that when x and y have different signs x-y always "contribute" to each other so that its absolute value will increase: x=3, y=-1 --> |x-y|=|3+1|=|4|=4 or x=-3, y=1 --> |x-y|=|-3-1|=|4|=4.

But |x|-|y| is difference (thus not "contributing") of two positive values (as neither equals to zero). x=3, y=-1 --> |x|-|y|=|3|-|-1|=2 or x=-3, y=1 --> |x|-|y|=|-3|-|1|=2.

Re: gmat prep absolute values [#permalink]
26 Jun 2010, 18:48

Bunuel wrote:

Basically the question asks whether the distance between the two points x and y on the line is greater than the difference between the individual distances of x and y from 0.

|x-y|>|x|-|y|?

(1) y<x, 3 possible cases for |x-y|>|x|-|y|:

A. ---------------0---y---x---, 0<y<x --> in this case |x-y|>|x|-|y| becomes: x-y>x-y --> 0>0. Which is wrong; B. ---------y---0---------x---, y<0<x --> in this case |x-y|>|x|-|y| becomes: x-y>x+y --> y<0. Which is right, as we consider the range y<0<x; C. ---y---x---0--------------, y<x<0 --> in this case |x-y|>|x|-|y| becomes: x-y>-x+y --> x>y. Which is right, as we consider the range y<0<x.

Two different answers. Not sufficient.

(2) xy<0, means x and y have different signs, hence 2 cases for |x-y|>|x|-|y|:

A. ----y-----0-------x---, y<0<x --> in this case |x-y|>|x|-|y| becomes: x-y>x+y --> y<0. Which is right, as we consider the range y<0<x; B. ----x-----0-------y---, x<0<y --> in this case |x-y|>|x|-|y| becomes: -x+y>-x-y --> y>0. Which is right, as we consider the range x<0<y.

In both cases inequality holds true. Sufficient.

Answer: B.

Bunuel, for 1.B when .. y ..0 .. x, you said |x-y|>|x|-|y| becomes: x-y>x+y. and 1.c when ... y ... x ... 0, you said |x-y|>|x|-|y| becomes: x-y>-x+y --> x>y.

Can you explain this a little bit more? How did you go about removing the absolute signs for this scenarios?

Re: gmat prep absolute values [#permalink]
27 Jun 2010, 04:50

3

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

SujD wrote:

Bunuel, for 1.B when .. y ..0 .. x, you said |x-y|>|x|-|y| becomes: x-y>x+y. and 1.c when ... y ... x ... 0, you said |x-y|>|x|-|y| becomes: x-y>-x+y --> x>y.

Can you explain this a little bit more? How did you go about removing the absolute signs for this scenarios?

Thanks for your help.

Consider absolute value of some expression - |some \ expression|: If the expression in absolute value sign (||) is negative or if some \ expression<0 then |some \ expression|=-(some \ expression); If the expression in absolute value sign (||) is positive or if some \ expression>0 then |some \ expression|=some \ expression.

(It's the same as for |x|: if x<0, then |x|=-x and if x>0, then |x|=x)

We have |x-y|>|x|-|y|:

For B: ---------y---0---------x---, y<0<x (x>y) --> so as x-y>0, then |x-y|=x-y. Also as x>0, then |x|=x and as y<0, then |y|=-y. So in this case |x-y|>|x|-|y| becomes: x-y>x-(-y) or x-y>x+y --> 2y<0 --> y<0. Which is right, as we consider the range y<0<x;

Re: Is |x - y| > |x| - |y|? [#permalink]
01 Jan 2014, 20:55

1

This post received KUDOS

(1) is insuff. because if x and y equal to 10 and 2 respectively, then both sides of the inequality are the same weighted. But, if x, y are equal to 10 and -10 respectively, then left side is greater than the right side(from our perspective) of the inequality.

(2) states that either x or y is negative. We do not know which one is exactly negative. However, it is not important to find out this because in both cases the left side of the inequality is greater than the right side(from our perspective). Why? It is simple. On the left side the numbers are added while on the right side the same numbers are subtracted from each other. Therefore, this statement is sufficient.

So, the correct answer is B.

Last edited by aja1991 on 02 Jan 2014, 02:36, edited 2 times in total.

Re: gmat prep absolute values [#permalink]
02 Jan 2014, 20:39

Bunuel wrote:

SujD wrote:

Bunuel, for 1.B when .. y ..0 .. x, you said |x-y|>|x|-|y| becomes: x-y>x+y. and 1.c when ... y ... x ... 0, you said |x-y|>|x|-|y| becomes: x-y>-x+y --> x>y.

Can you explain this a little bit more? How did you go about removing the absolute signs for this scenarios?

Thanks for your help.

Consider absolute value of some expression - |some \ expression|: If the expression in absolute value sign (||) is negative or if some \ expression<0 then |some \ expression|=-(some \ expression); If the expression in absolute value sign (||) is positive or if some \ expression>0 then |some \ expression|=some \ expression.

(It's the same as for |x|: if x<0, then |x|=-x and if x>0, then |x|=x)

We have |x-y|>|x|-|y|:

For B: ---------y---0---------x---, y<0<x (x>y) --> so as x-y>0, then |x-y|=x-y. Also as x>0, then |x|=x and as y<0, then |y|=-y. So in this case |x-y|>|x|-|y| becomes: x-y>x-(-y) or x-y>x+y --> 2y<0 --> y<0. Which is right, as we consider the range y<0<x;

The same for C.

Hope it's clear.

Hi Bunuel, Thanks for this great explanation. But I am still unclear about this.

you said... for the case B.. y<0<x (x>y) --> so as x-y>0, then |x-y|=x-y. I understand this.

but how is this the same when it comes to case C. where x and y both are negative (y<x<0), although i do get that X is still greater than Y but I am confused how would it still translate to |x-y|=x-y when both of them are negative... wouldnt it be more like |x-y|=y-x , i get the RHS part ... its the LHS where I am confused.

Statement II is sufficient xy<0 means that either one of the numbers is negative and other is positive

|x-y| will always result to be a greater value as negative - positive or positive - negative will result in addition of the numbers and |x| - |y| will always result in subtraction.

Hence the answer is B _________________

If you find our response valuable, please encourage us with Kudos!

Re: gmat prep absolute values [#permalink]
03 Jan 2014, 03:40

Expert's post

rawjetraw wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

SujD wrote:

Bunuel, for 1.B when .. y ..0 .. x, you said |x-y|>|x|-|y| becomes: x-y>x+y. and 1.c when ... y ... x ... 0, you said |x-y|>|x|-|y| becomes: x-y>-x+y --> x>y.

Can you explain this a little bit more? How did you go about removing the absolute signs for this scenarios?

Thanks for your help.

Consider absolute value of some expression - |some \ expression|: If the expression in absolute value sign (||) is negative or if some \ expression<0 then |some \ expression|=-(some \ expression); If the expression in absolute value sign (||) is positive or if some \ expression>0 then |some \ expression|=some \ expression.

(It's the same as for |x|: if x<0, then |x|=-x and if x>0, then |x|=x)

We have |x-y|>|x|-|y|:

For B: ---------y---0---------x---, y<0<x (x>y) --> so as x-y>0, then |x-y|=x-y. Also as x>0, then |x|=x and as y<0, then |y|=-y. So in this case |x-y|>|x|-|y| becomes: x-y>x-(-y) or x-y>x+y --> 2y<0 --> y<0. Which is right, as we consider the range y<0<x;

The same for C.

Hope it's clear.

Hi Bunuel, Thanks for this great explanation. But I am still unclear about this.

you said... for the case B.. y<0<x (x>y) --> so as x-y>0, then |x-y|=x-y. I understand this.

but how is this the same when it comes to case C. where x and y both are negative (y<x<0), although i do get that X is still greater than Y but I am confused how would it still translate to |x-y|=x-y when both of them are negative... wouldnt it be more like |x-y|=y-x , i get the RHS part ... its the LHS where I am confused.

please explain thanks!

Consider x=-1 and y=-2 for C: in this case |x-y|=|-1-(-2)|=1=x-y.

Re: Is |x - y| > |x| - |y|? [#permalink]
24 Jan 2014, 13:17

Squaring and simplifying, is xy < |x||y|? 1. x > y. put x = -2, y = -4 NO; put x = 4, y = -2 YES. NOT SUFFICIENT 2. xy <0; |x||y| always > 0, so xy always < |x||y| SUFFICIENT

B.

gmatclubot

Re: Is |x - y| > |x| - |y|?
[#permalink]
24 Jan 2014, 13:17

hey guys, A metallurgist but currently working in a NGO and have scheduled my GMAT in December for second round .....u know. I read some but valuable blogs on this...

One thing I did not know when recruiting for the MBA summer internship was the following: just how important prior experience in the function that you're recruiting for...

Many of my classmates and I have been receiving queries from MBA aspirants who are interested in applying to SBS. The questions are usually focussed on the career opportunities after...