Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 21:12 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 21:12
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
76,983
 [2]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,983
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
76,983
 [2]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,983
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,844
Own Kudos:
8,945
 [1]
Given Kudos: 225
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,844
Kudos: 8,945
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MathRevolution
User avatar
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Last visit: 27 Sep 2022
Posts: 10,070
Own Kudos:
19,389
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
Posts: 10,070
Kudos: 19,389
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.

Is |x - y| > |x| - |y|?

(1) y < x
(2) xy < 0

If we modify the original condition,
if |x|>=|y|,
|x-y|>|x|-|y|>=0, so we can square both sides, which gives us (|x-y|)^2>(|x|-|y|)^2, and (x-y)^2>(|x|-|y|)^2
This becomes x^2+y^2-2xy>x^2+y^2-2|xy|, and if we simplify the inequality, -2xy>-2|xy|, and we ultimately want to know whether xy<0. This makes condition 2 sufficient.
if |x|<|y|, then |x|-|y|<0,
so |x-y|>|x|-|y| always work. Hence we do not need to deal with this, so the answer becomes (B).

Once we modify the original condition and the question according to the variable approach method 1, we can solve approximately 30% of DS questions.
User avatar
BillyZ
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Last visit: 03 May 2025
Posts: 1,143
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 926
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
GPA: 3.53
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
LM
Please tell the quick approach.... it took me loner than I should have taken....

Algebraic approach is given in my first post. Below is another approach:

\(|x-y|>|x|-|y|\)?

(1) \(y<x\)

Try two positive number \(x=3>y=1\) --> is \(|3-1|>|3|-|1|\)? --> is \(2>2\)? Answer NO.

Try ANY other case but both positive: \(x=-5>y=-7\) --> is \(|-5-(-7)|>|-5|-|-7|\)? --> is \(2>-2\)? Answer YES.

Two different answers. Not sufficient.

(2) \(xy<0\), means \(x\) and \(y\) have different signs.

Now we can spot here that when \(x\) and \(y\) have different signs \(x-y\) always "contribute" to each other so that its absolute value will increase: \(x=3\), \(y=-1\) --> \(|x-y|=|3+1|=|4|=4\) or \(x=-3\), \(y=1\) --> \(|x-y|=|-3-1|=|4|=4\).

But \(|x|-|y|\) is difference (thus not "contributing") of two positive values (as neither equals to zero). \(x=3\), \(y=-1\) --> \(|x|-|y|=|3|-|-1|=2\) or \(x=-3\), \(y=1\) --> \(|x|-|y|=|-3|-|1|=2\).

So \(xy<0\) means \(|x-y|>|x|-|y|\) is always true.

Sufficient.

Answer: B.

Hope it helps.

This graphical approach will help to verify those value.
Attachments

Untitled.jpg
Untitled.jpg [ 80.34 KiB | Viewed 12958 times ]

User avatar
BillyZ
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Last visit: 03 May 2025
Posts: 1,143
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 926
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
GPA: 3.53
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
study
Is \(|x - y| > |x| - |y|\)?

(1) \(y < x\)
(2) \(xy < 0\)

Explanation from RON (Manhattan)

Statement (1)
let's try x = 2, y = 1
is |2 - 1| > |2| - |1| ?
no.
let's try x = -1, y = -2
is |-1 - (-2)| > |-1| - |-2| ?
yes.
Insufficient.

Statement (2)

this means we have to pick OPPOSITE SIGNS. therefore, there are basically 6 cases to try:
* x is negative "bigger", y is positive "smaller"
* x is negative, y is positive, same magnitude
* x is negative "smaller", y is positive "bigger"
* x is positive "bigger", y is negative "smaller"
* x is positive, y is negative, same magnitude
* x is positive "smaller", y is negative "bigger"

If you try all of these --

-2, 1 --> is |-3| > 2 - 1? YES
-1, 1 --> is |-2| > 0? YES
-1, 2 --> is |-3| > 1 - 2? YES
2, -1 --> is |3| > 2 - 1? YES
1, -1 --> is |2| > 0? YES
1, -2 --> is |3| > 1 - 2? YES

the pattern is pretty clear: in each of these cases, the two numbers' magnitudes are working together on the left, but against each other on the right. therefore, the left-hand side is always going to be bigger.
Sufficient.
User avatar
gmatexam439
User avatar
Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 1,064
Own Kudos:
2,159
 [2]
Given Kudos: 200
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
Posts: 1,064
Kudos: 2,159
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer: B
IS |X-Y| > |X| - |Y| ?
a) Y<X
b) XY<0

Statement A:
If, Y=-1 X=1 then LHS=2 and RHS=0 -->Correct
If, Y=1 X=3 then LHS=2 and RHS=2 -->Incorrect
Thus INSUFFICIENT

Statement B:
Either of X or Y is -ve.
If, Y=-1 X=1 then LHS=2 and RHS=0 -->Correct
If, Y=1 X=-3 then LHS=4 and RHS=2 -->Correct
Thus SUFFICIENT
User avatar
TaN1213
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Last visit: 12 Mar 2019
Posts: 354
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 644
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 354
Kudos: 909
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Basically the question asks whether the distance between the two points x and y on the line is greater than the difference between the individual distances of x and y from 0.

\(|x-y|>|x|-|y|\)?

(1) \(y<x\), 3 possible cases for \(|x-y|>|x|-|y|\):

A. ---------------\(0\)---\(y\)---\(x\)---, \(0<y<x\) --> in this case \(|x-y|>|x|-|y|\) becomes: \(x-y>x-y\) --> \(0>0\). Which is wrong;
B. ---------\(y\)---\(0\)---------\(x\)---, \(y<0<x\) --> in this case \(|x-y|>|x|-|y|\) becomes: \(x-y>x+y\) --> \(y<0\). Which is right, as we consider the range \(y<0<x\);
C. ---\(y\)---\(x\)---\(0\)--------------, \(y<x<0\) --> in this case \(|x-y|>|x|-|y|\) becomes: \(x-y>-x+y\) --> \(x>y\). Which is right, as we consider the range \(y<x<0\).

Two different answers. Not sufficient.

(2) \(xy<0\), means \(x\) and \(y\) have different signs, hence 2 cases for \(|x-y|>|x|-|y|\):

A. ----\(y\)-----\(0\)-------\(x\)---, \(y<0<x\) --> in this case \(|x-y|>|x|-|y|\) becomes: \(x-y>x+y\) --> \(y<0\). Which is right, as we consider the range \(y<0<x\);
B. ----\(x\)-----\(0\)-------\(y\)---, \(x<0<y\) --> in this case \(|x-y|>|x|-|y|\) becomes: \(-x+y>-x-y\) --> \(y>0\). Which is right, as we consider the range \(x<0<y\).

In both cases inequality holds true. Sufficient.

Answer: B.
Hi Bunuel,

Tried hard to understand the following related to the red part above but at the end no success. Would you please clear my doubt?

In 1 B & C, you have changed the sign of x and y in RHS, and not modified the LHS(red part) according to the sign of x and y.---- Understood the explanation of st. 1
But in 2 B, You have modified also the LHS part according to the sign of x and y. (red part) ------- Why have you not followed the process that you have followed in st 1 ?

What did this difference in procedure depend on?
Thank You in advance.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,094
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TaN1213
Bunuel
Basically the question asks whether the distance between the two points x and y on the line is greater than the difference between the individual distances of x and y from 0.

\(|x-y|>|x|-|y|\)?

(1) \(y<x\), 3 possible cases for \(|x-y|>|x|-|y|\):

A. ---------------\(0\)---\(y\)---\(x\)---, \(0<y<x\) --> in this case \(|x-y|>|x|-|y|\) becomes: \(x-y>x-y\) --> \(0>0\). Which is wrong;
B. ---------\(y\)---\(0\)---------\(x\)---, \(y<0<x\) --> in this case \(|x-y|>|x|-|y|\) becomes: \(x-y>x+y\) --> \(y<0\). Which is right, as we consider the range \(y<0<x\);
C. ---\(y\)---\(x\)---\(0\)--------------, \(y<x<0\) --> in this case \(|x-y|>|x|-|y|\) becomes: \(x-y>-x+y\) --> \(x>y\). Which is right, as we consider the range \(y<x<0\).

Two different answers. Not sufficient.

(2) \(xy<0\), means \(x\) and \(y\) have different signs, hence 2 cases for \(|x-y|>|x|-|y|\):

A. ----\(y\)-----\(0\)-------\(x\)---, \(y<0<x\) --> in this case \(|x-y|>|x|-|y|\) becomes: \(x-y>x+y\) --> \(y<0\). Which is right, as we consider the range \(y<0<x\);
B. ----\(x\)-----\(0\)-------\(y\)---, \(x<0<y\) --> in this case \(|x-y|>|x|-|y|\) becomes: \(-x+y>-x-y\) --> \(y>0\). Which is right, as we consider the range \(x<0<y\).

In both cases inequality holds true. Sufficient.

Answer: B.
Hi Bunuel,

Tried hard to understand the following related to the red part above but at the end no success. Would you please clear my doubt?

In 1 B & C, you have changed the sign of x and y in RHS, and not modified the LHS(red part) according to the sign of x and y.---- Understood the explanation of st. 1
But in 2 B, You have modified also the LHS part according to the sign of x and y. (red part) ------- Why have you not followed the process that you have followed in st 1 ?

What did this difference in procedure depend on?
Thank You in advance.

When \(x \le 0\) then \(|x|=-x\), or more generally when \(\text{some expression} \le 0\) then \(|\text{some expression}| = -(\text{some expression})\). For example: \(|-5|=5=-(-5)\);

When \(x \ge 0\) then \(|x|=x\), or more generally when \(\text{some expression} \ge 0\) then \(|\text{some expression}| = \text{some expression}\). For example: \(|5|=5\)



(2) \(xy<0\), means \(x\) and \(y\) have different signs, hence 2 cases for \(|x-y|>|x|-|y|\):

B. ----\(x\)-----\(0\)-------\(y\)---.

This means that \(x<0<y\). So, \(x - y < 0\), \(x<0\) and \(y>0\). According to the properties above if \(x - y < 0\), then \(|x-y|=-(x-y)\), if \(x<0\), then \(|x|=-x\) and if \(y>0\), then \(|y|=y\).

Hope it's clear.
User avatar
TaN1213
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Last visit: 12 Mar 2019
Posts: 354
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 644
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 354
Kudos: 909
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

When \(x \le 0\) then \(|x|=-x\), or more generally when \(\text{some expression} \le 0\) then \(|\text{some expression}| = -(\text{some expression})\). For example: \(|-5|=5=-(-5)\);

When \(x \ge 0\) then \(|x|=x\), or more generally when \(\text{some expression} \ge 0\) then \(|\text{some expression}| = \text{some expression}\). For example: \(|5|=5\)



(2) \(xy<0\), means \(x\) and \(y\) have different signs, hence 2 cases for \(|x-y|>|x|-|y|\):

B. ----\(x\)-----\(0\)-------\(y\)---.

This means that \(x<0<y\). So, \(x - y < 0\), \(x<0\) and \(y>0\). According to the properties above if \(x - y < 0\), then \(|x-y|=-(x-y)\), if \(x<0\), then \(|x|=-x\) and if \(y>0\), then \(|y|=y\).

Hope it's clear.
Following this same approach, shouldn't the following part become (-x-y)?
Quote:

1C. ---\(y\)---\(x\)---\(0\)--------------, \(y<x<0\) --> in this case \(|x-y|>|x|-|y|\) becomes: \(x-y>-x+y\) --> \(x>y\). Which is right, as we consider the range \(y<x<0\).

in 2 B you have modified the \(x-y\) to -(x-y) because x is negative and y is positive. So in the same way the 1C should take (-x-y) as per the sign of x.
What am I missing?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
778,094
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,094
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TaN1213
Bunuel

When \(x \le 0\) then \(|x|=-x\), or more generally when \(\text{some expression} \le 0\) then \(|\text{some expression}| = -(\text{some expression})\). For example: \(|-5|=5=-(-5)\);

When \(x \ge 0\) then \(|x|=x\), or more generally when \(\text{some expression} \ge 0\) then \(|\text{some expression}| = \text{some expression}\). For example: \(|5|=5\)



(2) \(xy<0\), means \(x\) and \(y\) have different signs, hence 2 cases for \(|x-y|>|x|-|y|\):

B. ----\(x\)-----\(0\)-------\(y\)---.

This means that \(x<0<y\). So, \(x - y < 0\), \(x<0\) and \(y>0\). According to the properties above if \(x - y < 0\), then \(|x-y|=-(x-y)\), if \(x<0\), then \(|x|=-x\) and if \(y>0\), then \(|y|=y\).

Hope it's clear.
Following this same approach, shouldn't the following part become (-x-y)?
Quote:

1C. ---\(y\)---\(x\)---\(0\)--------------, \(y<x<0\) --> in this case \(|x-y|>|x|-|y|\) becomes: \(x-y>-x+y\) --> \(x>y\). Which is right, as we consider the range \(y<x<0\).

in 2 B you have modified the \(x-y\) to -(x-y) because x is negative and y is positive. So in the same way the 1C should take (-x-y) as per the sign of x.
What am I missing?

C. ---\(y\)---\(x\)---\(0\)--------------, \(y<x<0\):

x - y > 0, so |x - y| = x - y;
y < 0, so |y| = y;
x < 0, so |x| = x.

\(|x-y|>|x|-|y|\) --> x - y > -x - (-y) --> x - y > -x + y
avatar
khiemchii
Joined: 19 Nov 2016
Last visit: 24 Nov 2020
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 6
Kudos: 23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am a little bit concerned here.
If the question states x and y, can we make an assumption that x ≠ y?
For example here, without this assumption, i can let x = y and (2) is NS?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
778,094
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,094
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
khiemchii
I am a little bit concerned here.
If the question states x and y, can we make an assumption that x ≠ y?
For example here, without this assumption, i can let x = y and (2) is NS?

Unless it is explicitly stated otherwise, different variables CAN represent the same number.

For (2) though x = y is not possible because in this case we'd get x^2 < 0, which is not true for any real number, so x = y does not satisfy xy < 0 and therefore should not be considered for the second statement. Similarly, for (1) it's give that y < x, so x = y cannot be true.
User avatar
ManishKM1
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 22 Apr 2017
Last visit: 03 Jan 2019
Posts: 82
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 75
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 630 Q49 V26
GMAT 3: 690 Q48 V35
GPA: 3.7
GMAT 3: 690 Q48 V35
Posts: 82
Kudos: 315
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can anyone tell me the flaw in my logic

|x - y| > |x| - |y|
Squaring both sides
x^2 +y^2-2xy> x^2 +y^2-2|x||y|
simplifying, xy<|x||y|,

It will only be possible when product of xy is -ve. or xy<0, Hence B.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
76,983
 [1]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,983
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ManishKM1
Can anyone tell me the flaw in my logic

|x - y| > |x| - |y|
Squaring both sides
x^2 +y^2-2xy> x^2 +y^2-2|x||y|
simplifying, xy<|x||y|,

It will only be possible when product of xy is -ve. or xy<0, Hence B.

Given:
|x - y| > |x| - |y|, you cannot square it. You can square only when you know that both sides are positive. Here, the right hand side may not be positive. For example, if x is 2 and y is 5.
3 > -3
Squaring does not work here since you get 9 > 9 which doesn't hold.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasPrepKarishma

Is it incorrect to say that question is asking is |x|>|y| ?

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,983
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mudit27021988
VeritasPrepKarishma

Is it incorrect to say that question is asking is |x|>|y| ?

Posted from my mobile device

For all real x and y, |x – y| >= |x| – |y|

|x – y| = |x| – |y| when
(1) x and y have the same sign and x has greater (or equal) absolute value than y
(2) y is 0

|x – y| > |x| – |y| in all other cases (i.e. y is not 0 and |x| < |y| or x and y have opposite signs)

So |x – y| > |x| – |y| is not the same as |x| > |y|

Check: https://www.gmatclub.com/forum/veritas-prep-resource-links-no-longer-available-399979.html#/2014/0 ... -the-gmat/
https://www.gmatclub.com/forum/veritas-prep-resource-links-no-longer-available-399979.html#/2014/0 ... t-part-ii/
User avatar
Mo2men
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Last visit: 09 May 2023
Posts: 2,439
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 641
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Products:
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Posts: 2,439
Kudos: 1,478
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear GMATGuruNY

In this question stem, can I square both sides? or is it wrong?

Thanks
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,344
Own Kudos:
3,795
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,344
Kudos: 3,795
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mo2men
Dear GMATGuruNY

In this question stem, can I square both sides? or is it wrong?

Thanks

Squaring both sides of an inequality is a good approach when both sides are guaranteed to be nonnegative.
Here, the right side of the question stem is NOT guaranteed to be nonnegative, so squaring the inequality is not recommended:
If x=2 and y=1, then |x| - |y| > 0
If x=1 and y=2, then |x| - |y| < 0
User avatar
nick1816
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 19 Oct 2018
Last visit: 06 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,849
Own Kudos:
8,236
 [1]
Given Kudos: 707
Location: India
Posts: 1,849
Kudos: 8,236
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
|x - y| > |x| - |y|

Above inequality will be true when xy<0. As in LHS, absolute values of x and y will add up, while in RHS absolute values of x and y will get subtracted.

Also,inequality will be true, when xy>0 and |x|<|y|, As LHS will be positive, but RHS will be negative.

Statement 1- y<x

if x<0 and y<0, |y|>|x| (inequality holds)
if x>0 and y>0, |y|<|x| (inequality won't hold)

Statement 2- xy<0
Inequality holds (As explained above)


study
Is |x - y| > |x| - |y|?

(1) y < x
(2) xy < 0


Attachment:
3_DS_Absolute_B.JPG
   1   2   3   
Moderators:
Math Expert
105355 posts
496 posts