NEW HERE? LEARN MORE
closeclose
Last visit was: 09 May 2024, 22:41 It is currently 09 May 2024, 22:41
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New posts
New comers' posts

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel

More than twenty-one centuries ago,

SORT BY:
Date
Kudos
Tags:
Find Similar Topics 
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
B
nusmavrik
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Status:Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Posts: 470
Own Kudos [?]: 2384 [9]
Given Kudos: 36
Location: Singapore
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: Chicago Booth - Class of 2015
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User
More than twenty-one centuries ago, [#permalink] New post   25 Jun 2010, 00:27
1
Kudos
7
Bookmarks
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

71% (00:54) correct 29% (01:04) wrong based on 496 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
More than twenty-one centuries ago, the Han dynasty unified China, subduing warring tribes and forced the vast territory to adopt a single code of laws.

(A) subduing warring tribes and forced

(B) subduing warring tribes and forcing

(C) subdued warring tribes, and forcing

(D) subdued warring tribes, and it forced

(E) having subdued warring tribes, and they forced
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
B
User avatar
sag
Manager
Manager
Joined: 20 Apr 2010
Posts: 107
Own Kudos [?]: 44 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Location: I N D I A
 Q44  V22
Send PM
Re: More than twenty-one centuries ago, [#permalink] New post   26 Jun 2010, 01:31
1
Kudos
nusmavrik wrote:
The answer is ................. B

Its simple parallelism :-D Han dynasty is the subject and main verb is unified. "subduing" and "forcing" modifies the clause "Han dynasty unified China". If China would have been the subject then A is correct.

You can compare this SC to following SC - where the subject is "local times"
The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local times, which was determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing from city to city, and to the establishment of regional times.

(A) which was determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing
(B) which was determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and which differed
(C) which were determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing
(D) determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differed
(E) determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing

Sorry if I changed the thought process by the words "tricky". But I want to be 100% sure on the explanation.


Nice Question nusmavrik... it was simple parallelism but your Subject the answer is tricky, it not simple parallelism ! forced me to give it a second thought..

Thanks once again for the Q..
User avatar
L
egmat
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4372
Own Kudos [?]: 30870 [3]
Given Kudos: 638
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Re: More than twenty-one centuries ago, [#permalink] New post   03 Jul 2012, 08:52
1
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
pavanpuneet wrote:
This is a very typical GMAT question .. in which they put in a modifier between and... thereby confusing between the parallel structure. One must closely look at the meaning intended and hence, A should be the right answer!

Hi there,
More than twenty-one centuries ago, the Han dynasty unified China, subduing warring tribes and forced the vast territory to adopt a single code of laws.

Another very good example of a sentence where meaning plays a crucial role. If we don’t understand the meaning well, most likely we will mark the incorrect answer choice. So let’s begin the meaning analysis.



The sentence says that twenty-one centuries ago, the Han dynasty unified China. So how did they do so? They did so by subduing warring tribes. Then the sentence says that the Han dynasty “forced” the vast territory to adopt a single code of laws. If the Han rulers forced everyone to adopt single code of laws, isn’t that a move towards unifying China? Yes, it is. So the Han dynasty unified China by:
a. subduing warring tribes and
b. forcing the vast territory to adopt a single code of laws.



ERROR ANALYSIS

With this understanding of meaning, it is easy to spot that verb “forced” should be turned into a verb-ing modifier “forcing” to make it parallel to “subduing”. In that case, both the modifiers will present how the Han dynasty unified China.

POE:

(A) subduing warring tribes and forced: Incorrect for the reason discussed above.

(B) subduing warring tribes and forcing: Correct. “forcing” is now parallel to “subduing”.

(C) subdued warring tribes, and forcing: Incorrect. This choice changes verb-ing modifier “subduing” to verb “subdued” which is now parallel to “unified”. “and” is the indicator of a parallel list in the sentence. However, the last entity followed by “and”, “forcing” is not parallel to the other two entities. Also, this is not the intended list.

(D) subdued warring tribes, and it forced: Incorrect. Presence of “it” is incorrect here. If there were no “it”, then all the entities would be parallel. However, this is not the intended list anyway.

(E) having subdued warring tribes, and they forced: Incorrect. Plural pronoun “they” does not agree in number with its singular antecedent “Han dynasty”.

At e-gmat we cover in details how to identify the correct parallel list and how to make the list parallel in the sentence in the concepts names “Parallelism – Identify and Correct” and “Parallelism – Helpful Tips”.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
Shraddha
User avatar
L
egmat
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4372
Own Kudos [?]: 30870 [1]
Given Kudos: 638
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Re: More than twenty-one centuries ago, [#permalink] New post   05 Jul 2012, 07:49
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
thangvietnam wrote:
in the following, oa is E.


The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local times, //which was determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing// from city to city, and to the establishment of regional times.

(A) which was determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing
(B) which was determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and which differed
(C) which were determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing
(D) determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differed
(E) determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing

Bu I see A is also parallel and correct because

which was :
determined
and
differing.

inhere, "determined" is parallel to " differing" and A is correct

A can be INcorrect becuase the distance between " determined" and "differing" is far and we need to repeat "which was" before "differing" . If this was the case, A is wrong becuase of "style" problem not of parallel problem.

Pls, comment, confirm.


Hi there,

The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local times, which was determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing from city to city, and to the establishment of regional times.

This sentence presents a couple of information about “local times”. They were
a. determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and
b. differing from city to city, and to the establishment of regional times.

In the original sentence, the first information is presented, using “which” clause, but the second information does not start with which. Now, this is certainly a parallelism issue. In the parallel list, all the entities must have same construction as far as possible.

Now, presence of “was” makes “determined” a verb. However, in absence of “which was” before it, “differing” is still a verb-ing modifier. So a “which clause” cannot be parallel to a verb-ing modifier. We certainly have parallelism issue here.

Again, if we assume that “which was” is understood before “differing”, then we have the first information about the “local times” in simple present tense – “was determined” – and second information in past continuous tense – “was differing”. Why should this be the case? Both the information should be written in simple past tense because the sentence is giving general information about “local times”. Hence, we certainly have parallelism issue here.

We cannot say that this error is stylistic because “which was” is far away from “differing”. We saw the possible implications of "which was" in the sentence.

Also notice that “local times” is plural and “was” is singular verb. So we have subject-verb number agreement error as well.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
Shraddha
User avatar
sag
Manager
Manager
Joined: 20 Apr 2010
Posts: 107
Own Kudos [?]: 44 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Location: I N D I A
 Q44  V22
Send PM
Re: More than twenty-one centuries ago, [#permalink] New post   25 Jun 2010, 01:37
nusmavrik wrote:
People lets discuss !

More than twenty-one centuries ago, the Han dynasty unified China, subduing warring tribes and forced the vast territory to adopt a single code of laws.

(A) subduing warring tribes and forced

(B) subduing warring tribes and forcing : looks little awkward

(C) subdued warring tribes, and forcing

(D) subdued warring tribes, and it forced

(E) having subdued warring tribes, and they forced

Which one and why? Please explain.


Confused between A and C.. If i use the rule that coordinating conjunction and should be preceded by , then i go with C else A looks better as it explains how the Han dynasty unified China so the verb should be in participle form i.e. Subduing and not Past as subdued...

i might b wrong but just giving it a try...
avatar
meghna800
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Jun 2010
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: More than twenty-one centuries ago, [#permalink] New post   25 Jun 2010, 02:49
This is a modifier question.
Very first is to understand the structure of the sentense. In the clause we say "Han dynasty unified China". If you concentrate on the two parts "sudsiding ... " and "forced ...." both of these actions are exactly what Han Dynasty did to unite China. So ideally, these should fit as modifiers for the same action.
..... the Han dynasty unified China, subduing ... and forcing ....
The above is a very direct explanation. But there are flaws in the other options too. But major clue for me is what I explained above.
User avatar
MrFriendship
Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 Mar 2010
Posts: 34
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 39
Send PM
Re: More than twenty-one centuries ago, [#permalink] New post   25 Jun 2010, 09:52
These types of questions are really tricky for me as well. Its can be tough to understand the flow of the sentence.

So far I think either:
(1)
The han dynasty unified China
(a) by subduing warring tribes
(b) by forcing the vast territory to adopt a single code...

or(2)

The han dynasty unified China
(a) by subduing warring tribes
And forced the vast territory to adopt a single code...

I'm leaning toward example (1) which would be answer choice B.
I think for example (2) to be correct "by subduing warring tribes" would have to be in in commas.
But i'm still not 100% sure. Whats the OA?
User avatar
B
nusmavrik
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Status:Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Posts: 470
Own Kudos [?]: 2384 [0]
Given Kudos: 36
Location: Singapore
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: Chicago Booth - Class of 2015
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: More than twenty-one centuries ago, [#permalink] New post   25 Jun 2010, 10:30
Hey mailnavin1
Can you please elaborate your answer?

mailnavin1 wrote:
STRONGLY A
User avatar
B
nusmavrik
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Status:Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Posts: 470
Own Kudos [?]: 2384 [0]
Given Kudos: 36
Location: Singapore
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: Chicago Booth - Class of 2015
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: More than twenty-one centuries ago, [#permalink] New post   25 Jun 2010, 19:43
The answer is ................. B

Its simple parallelism :-D Han dynasty is the subject and main verb is unified. "subduing" and "forcing" modifies the clause "Han dynasty unified China". If China would have been the subject then A is correct.

You can compare this SC to following SC - where the subject is "local times"
The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local times, which was determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing from city to city, and to the establishment of regional times.

(A) which was determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing
(B) which was determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and which differed
(C) which were determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing
(D) determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differed
(E) determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing

Sorry if I changed the thought process by the words "tricky". But I want to be 100% sure on the explanation.
User avatar
seekmba
Director
Director
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 633
Own Kudos [?]: 3227 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Send PM
Re: More than twenty-one centuries ago, [#permalink] New post   14 Jul 2010, 09:52
I narrowed it to A and B but A does not make sense. Hence chose B.
User avatar
vudsri000
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2010
Posts: 54
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 13
Send PM
Re: More than twenty-one centuries ago, [#permalink] New post   30 Jul 2010, 00:29
Went for B ...glad that it turned out to be OA
User avatar
vudsri000
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2010
Posts: 54
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 13
Send PM
Re: More than twenty-one centuries ago, [#permalink] New post   30 Jul 2010, 00:32
above explanation was perfect ..............but I used logic instead of Grammar .....In A it was trying to explain that China was ruled , subdued and unified ......

But B tells how China was ruled by Hans .............felt that logically B is making sense .....
avatar
pavanpuneet
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Dec 2011
Posts: 78
Own Kudos [?]: 138 [0]
Given Kudos: 17
Send PM
Re: More than twenty-one centuries ago, [#permalink] New post   03 Jul 2012, 06:43
This is a very typical GMAT question .. in which they put in a modifier between and... thereby confusing between the parallel structure. One must closely look at the meaning intended and hence, A should be the right answer!
User avatar
B
thevenus
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Status:Final Countdown
Posts: 320
Own Kudos [?]: 1311 [0]
Given Kudos: 76
Location: United States (NY)
GPA: 3.82
WE:Account Management (Retail Banking)
Send PM
Re: More than twenty-one centuries ago, [#permalink] New post   03 Jul 2012, 10:09
+1 for (B)
POE works, other other (B) nothing is suitably parallel.
User avatar
S
thangvietname
Director
Director
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 530
Own Kudos [?]: 524 [0]
Given Kudos: 916
Send PM
Re: More than twenty-one centuries ago, [#permalink] New post   04 Jul 2012, 20:29
in the following, oa is E.


The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local times, //which was determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing// from city to city, and to the establishment of regional times.

(A) which was determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing
(B) which was determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and which differed
(C) which were determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing
(D) determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differed
(E) determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing

Bu I see A is also parallel and correct because

which was :
determined
and
differing.

inhere, "determined" is parallel to " differing" and A is correct

A can be INcorrect becuase the distance between " determined" and "differing" is far and we need to repeat "which was" before "differing" . If this was the case, A is wrong becuase of "style" problem not of parallel problem.

Pls, comment, confirm.
User avatar
arirux92
Manager
Manager
Joined: 03 May 2015
Posts: 129
Own Kudos [?]: 232 [0]
Given Kudos: 23
Location: South Africa
Concentration: International Business, Organizational Behavior
Schools: Rotman '21 Melbourne '18 (M) Thunderbird Fall '21 IE '22
GPA: 3.49
WE:Web Development (Insurance)
Send PM
Re: More than twenty-one centuries ago, [#permalink] New post   13 Jul 2016, 08:22
nusmavrik wrote:
People lets discuss !

More than twenty-one centuries ago, the Han dynasty unified China, subduing warring tribes and forced the vast territory to adopt a single code of laws.

(A) subduing warring tribes and forced

(B) subduing warring tribes and forcing

(C) subdued warring tribes, and forcing

(D) subdued warring tribes, and it forced

(E) having subdued warring tribes, and they forced

Which one and why? Please explain.


This boils down to which is the main clause and which are the dependent? We can't have dependent and main clause parallel :

So which makes more sense :

He unified china

How?

By subduing warring tribes and forcing territory

Or he subded warring tribes and forced... by unifying China?

Clearly B
User avatar
P
Nightmare007
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 449
Own Kudos [?]: 395 [0]
Given Kudos: 204
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, International Business
Schools: ISB '20 (M) Simon '21 (WL)
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: More than twenty-one centuries ago, [#permalink] New post   04 Jan 2018, 02:22
Explanation on how it unified is shown in portion. So we need two parallel verb+ing format words to fulfill the conditions and show the exact meaning.

Answer must be B
avatar
RockstarNeha
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Feb 2021
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: More than twenty-one centuries ago, [#permalink] New post   06 Nov 2021, 23:58
more than 21 centuries ago, the han dynasty unified china, subduing warring tribes and forced the vast territory to adopt a single code of laws.
REASON FOR ANSWER B
User avatar
L
ExpertsGlobal5
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5124
Own Kudos [?]: 4684 [0]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: More than twenty-one centuries ago, [#permalink] New post   07 Nov 2021, 00:35
Expert Reply
RockstarNeha wrote:
more than 21 centuries ago, the han dynasty unified china, subduing warring tribes and forced the vast territory to adopt a single code of laws.
REASON FOR ANSWER B


Hello RockstarNeha,

We hope this finds you well.

Having gone through the question and your query, we believe that we can help resolve your doubt.

Understanding the intended meaning of the sentence is key to solving this question; the intended meaning is that the Han dynasty unified China, and in doing so took two subordinate actions - subduing warring tribes and forcing the territory to adopt a single code of laws.

Option B conveys this meaning correctly through the "comma + present participle ("verb+ing" - "subduing" and "forcing" in this case)" construction. Further, as a result of using this construction Option B also maintains parallelism between "subduing..." and "forcing...", two elements linked by conjunction, and avoids parallelism between the dominant action "unified China" and the subordinate actions "subduing..." and "forcing...".

To understand the concept of "Comma + Present Participles for Cause-Effect Relationships" on GMAT, you may want to watch the following video (~3 minutes):



All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
P
Crytiocanalyst
Director
Director
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Posts: 993
Own Kudos [?]: 183 [0]
Given Kudos: 309
Send PM
Re: More than twenty-one centuries ago, [#permalink] New post   07 Nov 2021, 04:39
nusmavrik wrote:
More than twenty-one centuries ago, the Han dynasty unified China, subduing warring tribes and forced the vast territory to adopt a single code of laws.


(A) subduing warring tribes and forced
subduing and forcing aren't parallel therefore out

(B) subduing warring tribes and forcing
The meaning is perfect the subduing and forcing is parallel therefore let us hang on to it

(C) subdued warring tribes, and forcing
Similar reasoning as A

(D) subdued warring tribes, and it forced
it isn't having the right reference therefore out

(E) having subdued warring tribes, and they forced
having is unnecessary , in addition they isn't having the right reference therefore out

Therefore IMO B
GMAT Club Bot
gmatclubot
Re: More than twenty-one centuries ago, [#permalink]
07 Nov 2021, 04:39
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6922 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne
Main navigation
GMAT Resources
Partners
MBA Resources
www.gmac.com|www.mba.com | | GMAT Club Rules | Terms and Conditions