Forum Home > GMAT > Quantitative > Problem Solving (PS)
Events & Promotions
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 2107:30 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Are you curious about the dynamic field of Product Management and how it can shape your career trajectory? Join Carnegie Mellon for an insightful conversation about the MS in Product Management (MSPM) ...
May 2511:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
In this webinar, Rajat Sadana, GMAT Club’s #1 rated expert will help you create a personalized study plan so that each one of you can visualize your journey to a top GMAT Focus Score.
May 2501:00 PM EDT
-02:00 PM EDT
Think a 100% GMAT Focus Verbal score is out of your reach? TTP will make you think again! Our course uses techniques such as topical study and spaced repetition to maximize knowledge retention and make studying simple and fun.- May 26
12:00 PM PDT
-01:00 PM PDT
In this podcast, we talk to Lindsay Loyd, Executive Director, of MBA Admissions at NYU Stern, Hunter Brickey, NYU Stern alumnus and Daisy Cheng, a current student at NYU Stern, and more. 
May 2601:00 PM EDT
-02:00 PM EDT
The Target Test Prep team is excited to announce multiple live online classes for GMAT Focus test-takers in May. Our 40-hour LiveTeach program will take your GMAT Focus score to the next level.
Mainline Airways was bought by its employees six years ago.
[#permalink]
Updated on: 13 Apr 2014, 04:19
Updated on: 13 Apr 2014, 04:19
3
Kudos
14
Bookmarks
Show timer
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
35%
(medium)
Question Stats:
71% (01:42) correct
29%
(01:48)
wrong
based on 1695
sessions
Mainline Airways was bought by its employees six years ago. Three years ago, Mainline hired QualiCo Advertising Agency to handle its promotions and advertising division. Today Mainline’s profits are over 20 percent higher than they were five years ago and 10 percent higher than they were three years ago. Employee ownership and a good advertising agency have combined to make Mainline more profitable.
Which of the following best describes the weak point in the argument above?
(A) It fails to establish a causal connection between the change in ownership at Mainline Airways and the hiring of QualiCo, on the one hand, and the rise in Mainline’s profits, on the other.
(B) It presents no evidence showing that employee-owned airlines are any more profitable than other airlines.
(C) It assumes that the profits of Mainline Airways will continue to rise.
(D) It gives no exact figures for the current profits of Mainline Airways.
(E) It fails to explain how the profits of Mainline Airways are calculated.
Which of the following best describes the weak point in the argument above?
(A) It fails to establish a causal connection between the change in ownership at Mainline Airways and the hiring of QualiCo, on the one hand, and the rise in Mainline’s profits, on the other.
(B) It presents no evidence showing that employee-owned airlines are any more profitable than other airlines.
(C) It assumes that the profits of Mainline Airways will continue to rise.
(D) It gives no exact figures for the current profits of Mainline Airways.
(E) It fails to explain how the profits of Mainline Airways are calculated.
Originally posted by seekmba on 09 Mar 2010, 14:37.
Last edited by ankurgupta03 on 13 Apr 2014, 04:19, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by ankurgupta03 on 13 Apr 2014, 04:19, edited 1 time in total.
added the OA
Manager
Joined: 21 Jul 2009
Posts: 218
Schools:LBS, INSEAD, IMD, ISB - Anything with just 1 yr program.
Re: How to attack this CR - Mainline Airways
[#permalink]
09 Mar 2010, 16:21
09 Mar 2010, 16:21
4
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
seekmba wrote:
Mainline Airways was bought by its employees six years ago. Three years ago, Mainline hired QualiCo Advertising Agency to handle its promotions and advertising division. Today Mainline’s profits are over 20 percent higher than they were five years ago and 10 percent higher than they were three years ago. Employee ownership and a good advertising agency have combined to make Mainline more profitable.
Which of the following best describes the weak point in the argument above?
(A) It fails to establish a causal connection between the change in ownership at Mainline Airways and the hiring of QualiCo, on the one hand, and the rise in Mainline’s profits, on the other.
(B) It presents no evidence showing that employee-owned airlines are any more profitable than other airlines.
(C) It assumes that the profits of Mainline Airways will continue to rise.
(D) It gives no exact figures for the current profits of Mainline Airways.
(E) It fails to explain how the profits of Mainline Airways are calculated.
Which of the following best describes the weak point in the argument above?
(A) It fails to establish a causal connection between the change in ownership at Mainline Airways and the hiring of QualiCo, on the one hand, and the rise in Mainline’s profits, on the other.
(B) It presents no evidence showing that employee-owned airlines are any more profitable than other airlines.
(C) It assumes that the profits of Mainline Airways will continue to rise.
(D) It gives no exact figures for the current profits of Mainline Airways.
(E) It fails to explain how the profits of Mainline Airways are calculated.
Straight-forward A, my take.
Mainline has huge employee stakes. Qualico, an advertising agency was bought. Today Mainline's profits are nice and healthy. So, huge employee stakes and acquiring an ad-agency are reasons for profits is the conclusion. Clearly, there is no proper justification for the conclusion. Anything could be the reason for the current profits other than the given two premises. The relationship posed is weak and open for a lot of debate. So that my friend, is the flaw in the reasoning.
General Discussion
Re: How to attack this CR - Mainline Airways
[#permalink]
10 Mar 2010, 07:34
10 Mar 2010, 07:34
OA is certainly (A). Thanks for the explanation.
Re: How to attack this CR - Mainline Airways
[#permalink]
20 May 2011, 15:20
20 May 2011, 15:20
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
seekmba wrote:
Mainline Airways was bought by its employees six years ago. Three years ago, Mainline hired QualiCo Advertising Agency to handle its promotions and advertising division. Today Mainline’s profits are over 20 percent higher than they were five years ago and 10 percent higher than they were three years ago. Employee ownership and a good advertising agency have combined to make Mainline more profitable.
Which of the following best describes the weak point in the argument above?
(A) It fails to establish a causal connection between the change in ownership at Mainline Airways and the hiring of QualiCo, on the one hand, and the rise in Mainline’s profits, on the other.
(B) It presents no evidence showing that employee-owned airlines are any more profitable than other airlines.
(C) It assumes that the profits of Mainline Airways will continue to rise.
(D) It gives no exact figures for the current profits of Mainline Airways.
(E) It fails to explain how the profits of Mainline Airways are calculated.
Which of the following best describes the weak point in the argument above?
(A) It fails to establish a causal connection between the change in ownership at Mainline Airways and the hiring of QualiCo, on the one hand, and the rise in Mainline’s profits, on the other.
(B) It presents no evidence showing that employee-owned airlines are any more profitable than other airlines.
(C) It assumes that the profits of Mainline Airways will continue to rise.
(D) It gives no exact figures for the current profits of Mainline Airways.
(E) It fails to explain how the profits of Mainline Airways are calculated.
Agreed-->
A - We do need to know how 2 things lead to the conclusion. Time period in itself is not able to create a causal connection. We need some thing such as... "employee productivity increased after employee take over and better advertising led to more clients thus company's profits increased ...blah blah"
But, choice B is not a bad option at all. In absence of A, I strongly believe this is a valid weakening contendor. Any takers for B in absence of A..... ????????
Re: How to attack this CR - Mainline Airways
[#permalink]
20 May 2011, 17:30
20 May 2011, 17:30
1
Kudos
At first instance I pick B but A is better.
The passage dis not mention anything about other companies, rivals and so on....BUT only that is profitable. The weak point is: we have some clue that say to us the reason why or better, a casual conclusion between that 2 elements and the rise of profits ?? No, so -> A is the answer.
however B is a good distraction
_________________
The passage dis not mention anything about other companies, rivals and so on....BUT only that is profitable. The weak point is: we have some clue that say to us the reason why or better, a casual conclusion between that 2 elements and the rise of profits ?? No, so -> A is the answer.
however B is a good distraction
_________________
COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS AND RESOURCES
Quant: 1. ALL GMATPrep questions Quant/Verbal 2. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation 3. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS 4. Veritas Prep Blog PDF Version 5. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Quant Videos
Verbal:1. Verbal question bank and directories by Carcass 2. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Verbal Videos 3. Critical Reasoning_Oldy but goldy question banks 4. Sentence Correction_Oldy but goldy question banks 5. Reading-comprehension_Oldy but goldy question banks
Quant: 1. ALL GMATPrep questions Quant/Verbal 2. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation 3. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS 4. Veritas Prep Blog PDF Version 5. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Quant Videos
Verbal:1. Verbal question bank and directories by Carcass 2. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Verbal Videos 3. Critical Reasoning_Oldy but goldy question banks 4. Sentence Correction_Oldy but goldy question banks 5. Reading-comprehension_Oldy but goldy question banks
Re: How to attack this CR - Mainline Airways
[#permalink]
20 May 2011, 17:55
20 May 2011, 17:55
1
Kudos
carcass wrote:
At first instance I pick B but A is better.
The passage dis not mention anything about other companies, rivals and so on....BUT only that is profitable. The weak point is: we have some clue that say to us the reason why or better, a casual conclusion between that 2 elements and the rise of profits ?? No, so -> A is the answer.
however B is a good distraction
The passage dis not mention anything about other companies, rivals and so on....BUT only that is profitable. The weak point is: we have some clue that say to us the reason why or better, a casual conclusion between that 2 elements and the rise of profits ?? No, so -> A is the answer.
however B is a good distraction
@carcass
The point here is that we are talking of more profitability. As mentioned in the stimulus conclusion:
Employee ownership and a good advertising agency have combined to make Mainline [highlight]more profitable[/highlight].
One more correction I would like to make is that in strengthening and weakening, you can always introduce new elements in picture, so deleting them on the basis of being external would eliminate valid choices.
Upon another look, I found that B talks only about one component ie "employee-owned airlines" and completely neglects QualiCo contribution. That seems to be a little minus in comparing B with A. But, I am still looking for a strong reason to kick B out.
CR champions --> F1 F1
Re: How to attack this CR - Mainline Airways
[#permalink]
21 May 2011, 17:10
21 May 2011, 17:10
joshnsit wrote:
carcass wrote:
At first instance I pick B but A is better.
The passage dis not mention anything about other companies, rivals and so on....BUT only that is profitable. The weak point is: we have some clue that say to us the reason why or better, a casual conclusion between that 2 elements and the rise of profits ?? No, so -> A is the answer.
however B is a good distraction
The passage dis not mention anything about other companies, rivals and so on....BUT only that is profitable. The weak point is: we have some clue that say to us the reason why or better, a casual conclusion between that 2 elements and the rise of profits ?? No, so -> A is the answer.
however B is a good distraction
@carcass
The point here is that we are talking of more profitability. As mentioned in the stimulus conclusion:
Employee ownership and a good advertising agency have combined to make Mainline [highlight]more profitable[/highlight].
One more correction I would like to make is that in strengthening and weakening, you can always introduce new elements in picture, so deleting them on the basis of being external would eliminate valid choices.
Upon another look, I found that B talks only about one component ie "employee-owned airlines" and completely neglects QualiCo contribution. That seems to be a little minus in comparing B with A. But, I am still looking for a strong reason to kick B out.
CR champions --> F1 F1
I believe that you are looking at the question in the wrong way (in my opinion)
here the point is NOT more profitable, less profitable and so on: this is not the real point.
On one hand we know that the company earn more money, ok, that say.
On the other hand the stimulus says: Which of the following best describes the weak point in the argument above ?
choice B suggest in somehow a general reason which demolishes the argument, instead A says: 2 (employee-owned)+2(QualiCo)= 4 (more profitable, little more profitable....who cares).......no evidence !!!!!
_________________
COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS AND RESOURCES
Quant: 1. ALL GMATPrep questions Quant/Verbal 2. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation 3. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS 4. Veritas Prep Blog PDF Version 5. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Quant Videos
Verbal:1. Verbal question bank and directories by Carcass 2. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Verbal Videos 3. Critical Reasoning_Oldy but goldy question banks 4. Sentence Correction_Oldy but goldy question banks 5. Reading-comprehension_Oldy but goldy question banks
Quant: 1. ALL GMATPrep questions Quant/Verbal 2. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation 3. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS 4. Veritas Prep Blog PDF Version 5. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Quant Videos
Verbal:1. Verbal question bank and directories by Carcass 2. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Verbal Videos 3. Critical Reasoning_Oldy but goldy question banks 4. Sentence Correction_Oldy but goldy question banks 5. Reading-comprehension_Oldy but goldy question banks
Re: How to attack this CR - Mainline Airways
[#permalink]
21 May 2011, 18:07
21 May 2011, 18:07
After choice A; B can be 2nd weak attempt for this but than it doesn't say anything about promotions/advertising campaign. So take should be A.
Re: How to attack this CR - Mainline Airways
[#permalink]
25 May 2011, 03:18
25 May 2011, 03:18
amit2k9 wrote:
its a clean A.
Why not B?
Would you have selected B in absence of A?
Re: How to attack this CR - Mainline Airways
[#permalink]
25 May 2011, 03:39
25 May 2011, 03:39
In the absense of A, I would take E.
Re: Mainline Airways was bought by its employees six years ago.
[#permalink]
28 Aug 2012, 12:03
28 Aug 2012, 12:03
joshnsit wrote:
amit2k9 wrote:
its a clean A.
Why not B?
Would you have selected B in absence of A?
B is wrong..
is stimus contain anything abt other airlines?? its irrelavant to the conclusion.. it is not hitting the conclusion.. we dont need to hit by comparing with other companies?? we just care with mainline..
_________________
Bole So Nehal.. Sat Siri Akal.. Waheguru ji help me to get 700+ score !
Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2011
Status:exam is close ... dont know if i ll hit that number
Posts: 108
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 10-09-2012
GPA: 3.2
Re: Mainline Airways was bought by its employees six years ago.
[#permalink]
29 Aug 2012, 12:14
29 Aug 2012, 12:14
missed that one its a easy question
the length of the option deceived me
the length of the option deceived me
Re: Mainline Airways was bought by its employees six years ago.
[#permalink]
31 Aug 2012, 03:18
31 Aug 2012, 03:18
Between A & B.
B is "The Shell Game" distraction.
Therefore A is correct.
B is "The Shell Game" distraction.
Therefore A is correct.
Re: Mainline Airways was bought by its employees six years ago.
[#permalink]
12 Apr 2014, 05:10
12 Apr 2014, 05:10
I don't know why people have a believe that choice (B) is a good contender.
IMHO, the stimulus is talking about profit comparison of same company at different times.
'More profitable' in the conclusion compares the current profit of the company with that in past.
So choice (A) is best
IMHO, the stimulus is talking about profit comparison of same company at different times.
'More profitable' in the conclusion compares the current profit of the company with that in past.
So choice (A) is best
Re: Mainline Airways was bought by its employees six years ago.
[#permalink]
17 Mar 2015, 20:31
17 Mar 2015, 20:31
Explanation for choice A
Type weaken
Conclusion: Employee ownership and advertising agency => Mainline more profitable
Assumption: Employess ownership and advertising agency cause mainline more profitable.
Break he assumption: there are other factorthat caused Mainline become more profit
Type weaken
Conclusion: Employee ownership and advertising agency => Mainline more profitable
Assumption: Employess ownership and advertising agency cause mainline more profitable.
Break he assumption: there are other factorthat caused Mainline become more profit
Re: Mainline Airways was bought by its employees six years ago.
[#permalink]
13 Dec 2019, 22:47
13 Dec 2019, 22:47
Two actions were taken by Airline and after years Airline claims profit increase due to the actions taken.
Correlation to causation error.
Choice A indicates that flaw.
Correlation to causation error.
Choice A indicates that flaw.
Re: Mainline Airways was bought by its employees six years ago.
[#permalink]
28 Jan 2020, 22:36
28 Jan 2020, 22:36
1
Kudos
Argument: Employees bought the airways. They hired the advertising agency. And their profits shot up.
Conclusion: Employee ownership and good advertising agency is the reason behind the profit.
Assumption: There is a connection between employee ownership and profits.
Which of the following best describes the weak point in the argument above?
(A) It fails to establish a causal connection between the change in ownership at Mainline Airways and the hiring of QualiCo, on the one hand, and the rise in Mainline’s profits, on the other.
Correct. Came to this through POE.
(B) It presents no evidence showing that employee-owned airlines are any more profitable than other airlines.
Wrong. We are not comparing or discussing about other airline.
(C) It assumes that the profits of Mainline Airways will continue to rise.
Wrong. We are only talking about past figures and not the future profits.
(D) It gives no exact figures for the current profits of Mainline Airways.
Wrong. We don't need it. We have the percentage values to determine.
(E) It fails to explain how the profits of Mainline Airways are calculated.
Wrong. We don't need their accounting method.
Conclusion: Employee ownership and good advertising agency is the reason behind the profit.
Assumption: There is a connection between employee ownership and profits.
Which of the following best describes the weak point in the argument above?
(A) It fails to establish a causal connection between the change in ownership at Mainline Airways and the hiring of QualiCo, on the one hand, and the rise in Mainline’s profits, on the other.
Correct. Came to this through POE.
(B) It presents no evidence showing that employee-owned airlines are any more profitable than other airlines.
Wrong. We are not comparing or discussing about other airline.
(C) It assumes that the profits of Mainline Airways will continue to rise.
Wrong. We are only talking about past figures and not the future profits.
(D) It gives no exact figures for the current profits of Mainline Airways.
Wrong. We don't need it. We have the percentage values to determine.
(E) It fails to explain how the profits of Mainline Airways are calculated.
Wrong. We don't need their accounting method.
Re: Mainline Airways was bought by its employees six years ago.
[#permalink]
11 Aug 2020, 09:39
11 Aug 2020, 09:39
even after reading all the replies, its still hard for me to agree with option A as the answer.!!!!!
Re: Mainline Airways was bought by its employees six years ago.
[#permalink]
20 Jun 2023, 06:50
20 Jun 2023, 06:50
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
gmatclubot
Re: Mainline Airways was bought by its employees six years ago. [#permalink]
20 Jun 2023, 06:50
Moderators:
|
|
|
Announcements
AGSM at UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE
Tuck at Dartmouth
|
