Last visit was: 26 Apr 2024, 15:19 It is currently 26 Apr 2024, 15:19

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 446
Own Kudos [?]: 6777 [63]
Given Kudos: 33
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 871
Own Kudos [?]: 8554 [22]
Given Kudos: 123
Location: United States
Send PM
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14831
Own Kudos [?]: 64940 [6]
Given Kudos: 427
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 225
Own Kudos [?]: 1372 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, General Management
GPA: 3.86
WE:Accounting (Commercial Banking)
Send PM
Re: Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Got D......but confused between A and D.can anyone please explain?


Thanks in advance

Got it

Originally posted by mydreammba on 26 Dec 2011, 16:56.
Last edited by mydreammba on 28 Dec 2011, 18:50, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Affiliations: Magoosh
Posts: 32
Own Kudos [?]: 845 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: United States (CA)
Send PM
Re: Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
In D, "from when" is an awkward phrase, and makes it grammatically unclear as to exactly when agriculture began.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 161
Own Kudos [?]: 569 [3]
Given Kudos: 99
Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
GMAT Date: 07-25-2013
GPA: 3.83
WE:Architecture (Computer Hardware)
Send PM
Re: Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did during the 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture to 1950.

A) Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did during the 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture to 1950.
B) Since 1990 the growth of the global economy has been more than that during 10,000 years, from when agriculture began.
C) The growth of the global economy since 1990 exceeds that which had been for 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture.
D) The growth of the global economy since 1990 exceeds what it has been for 10,000 years, from when agriculture began
E) The growth of the global economy since 1990 exceeds what it did for the 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture.

I have read this Manhattan forum:
to eliminate option E: the explanation was given as below:please can some one explain
what it did' doesn't make any sense:
* the growth didn't 'do' anything
* there's no other verb to which 'did' could logically be parallel to complete the comparison

Originally posted by skamal7 on 18 Jul 2013, 04:05.
Last edited by Zarrolou on 18 Jul 2013, 04:18, edited 1 time in total.
Merging similar topics.
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Status:Far, far away!
Posts: 859
Own Kudos [?]: 4891 [2]
Given Kudos: 219
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Send PM
Re: Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
skamal7 wrote:
I have read this Manhattan forum:
to eliminate option E: the explanation was given as below:please can some one explain
what it did' doesn't make any sense:
* the growth didn't 'do' anything
* there's no other verb to which 'did' could logically be parallel to complete the comparison


E) The growth of the global economy since 1990 exceeds what it did for the 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture.

* the growth didn't 'do' anything
This means that it's inappropriate to say "the growth exceeds what it did", from a logical point of view. The first part is fine ("the growth exceeds ") the second one is logically flawed as the growth cannot do anything ("what it did").
* there's no other verb to which 'did' could logically be parallel to complete the comparison
Example:
I sing better than Micheal Jackson does (sing).<== does stands for the verb "sing"
Now look at E: there is no verb that "did" can stand for. To give you another example, consider the correct answer:

A) Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did (grow)during the 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture to 1950.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Aug 2018
Posts: 51
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 135
Send PM
Re: Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did [#permalink]
LM wrote:
Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did during the 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture to 1950.

(A) Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did during the 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture

(B) Since 1990 the growth of the global economy has been more than that during 10,000 years, from when the agriculture began

(C) The growth of the global economy since 1990 exceeds that which had been for 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture

(D) The growth of the global economy since 1990 exceeds what it has been for 10,000 years, from when agriculture began

(E) The growth of the global economy since 1990 exceeds what it did for the 10,000 years from the beginning of agricultre


VeritasKarishma

Hi... I am unable to eliminate option B on logical grounds.sentence is intended to compare growth of the economy since 1990 with the growth of the economy during 10000 years. Request you to help in understanding logical errors w.r.t option B
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Posts: 368
Own Kudos [?]: 43 [0]
Given Kudos: 530
Send PM
Re: Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did [#permalink]
Is the use of "has" correct in (A),I think since time reference is given the question, we should opt out the use of "has"?
CEO
CEO
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 3675
Own Kudos [?]: 3528 [1]
Given Kudos: 149
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Send PM
Re: Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
lakshya14 wrote:
Is the use of "has" correct in (A),I think since time reference is given the question, we should opt out the use of "has"?

Hi Lakshya, option A uses present perfect tense has grown.

You can watch our video on Present Perfect.

p.s. Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses Present perfect tense, its application and examples in significant detail. If you or someone is interested, PM me your email-id; I can mail the corresponding section.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2017
Posts: 365
Own Kudos [?]: 78 [0]
Given Kudos: 832
Send PM
Re: Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did [#permalink]
Dear GMATGuruNY DmitryFarber MartyTargetTestPrep AjiteshArun GMATRockstar IanStewart VeritasPrepHailey EducationAisle GMATNinja VeritasPrepBrian RonPurewal,

Please confirm whether C. to E. are wrong because "exceedS" should be replaced with "HAS exceedED"?
I'm not sure because there are 2 stances on this

STANCE 1 : According to explanation from similar question https://gmatclub.com/forum/the-nineteen ... l#p2549075.
It's possible that "The growth of the global economy since 1990" does NOT NEED to be followed by present perfect tense.
GMATGuruNY wrote:
Superlatives:
the best, the worst, the greatest, the most, etc.
When since + NOUN PHRASE serves to refers to a superlative or to an entire group or category, often no verb is included.
Examples:
The company's product is THE BEST invention since sliced bread.
Economists expect THE WORST recession since the war.
The author discusses EVERY movie since 2000.

In the green constructions above, there is no verb, so the usage of the present perfect is NOT REQUIRED.

varotkorn wrote:
Why don't we need present perfect tense for SINCE in choice A.?

a critique of ALL chemistry since Robert Boyle

Here, since Robert Boyle serves to refer to an entire category -- ALL chemistry -- so there is no verb.
As a result, the usage of the present perfect is not required.

STANCE 2 :
In C:
The word since REQUIRES the present perfect tense: the growth...since 1990 has exceeded....
[/quote]
IMO, although The growth of the global economy since 1990 doesn't spell the word ALL explicitly, logically the phrase refers to the ENTIRE/ALL growth from 1990 onward.
So, I think despite the word "since", we don't actually need to use perfect tense as STANCE 1 mentions.

So, do we require or not require to use present perfect with the word "since" for choice C. in this question?
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 4128
Own Kudos [?]: 9247 [1]
Given Kudos: 91
 Q51  V47
Send PM
Re: Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
varotkorn wrote:
Please confirm whether C. to E. are wrong because "exceedS" should be replaced with "HAS exceedED"?
I'm not sure because there are 2 stances on this


C through E are wrong because they set up unclear or nonsensical comparisons. Changing the verb tense doesn't fix that problem.

I'll let the person you're quoting respond about those apparently conflicting "rules" about how to use "since", but most of the time when prep books propose rules like that, they're just not imagining situations where those rules don't apply. In sentences with a word as versatile as "since" (which can be used to mean "from the time of" or to mean "because") you can have any verb tense.
Tutor
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Posts: 1315
Own Kudos [?]: 3136 [0]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Send PM
Re: Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did [#permalink]
Expert Reply
varotkorn wrote:
IMO, although The growth of the global economy since 1990 doesn't spell the word ALL explicitly, logically the phrase refers to the ENTIRE/ALL growth from 1990 onward.
So, I think despite the word "since", we don't actually need to use perfect tense as STANCE 1 mentions.

So, do we require or not require to use present perfect with the word "since" for choice C. in this question?


I received a PM requesting that I comment.

ALL growth implies that MANY TYPES of growth exist and that EVERY TYPE of growth is under discussion.
THE growth of the global economy refers to ONE SPECIFIC TYPE of growth.
THE growthALL growth.
Thus, option C is not analogous to the OA about ALL chemistry since Robert Byrd.

Note also that the blue phrase above does not include a verb.
In C, a verb is present (exceeds).
Generally:
When a since-clause refers to time and includes a verb, the verb must be in a perfect tense.
This usage of since is by far the most common on the GMAT.
When since serves to express a causal relationship, a perfect tense is not required.
Only rarely does the GMAT seem to use since to express a causal relationship.
An example of this type of usage:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/prospecting- ... 92135.html
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 May 2020
Posts: 136
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 70
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GPA: 3.2
Send PM
Re: Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did [#permalink]
LM wrote:
Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did during the 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture to 1950.

(A) Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did during the 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture

(B) Since 1990 the growth of the global economy has been more than that during 10,000 years, from when the agriculture began

(C) The growth of the global economy since 1990 exceeds that which had been for 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture

(D) The growth of the global economy since 1990 exceeds what it has been for 10,000 years, from when agriculture began

(E) The growth of the global economy since 1990 exceeds what it did for the 10,000 years from the beginning of agricultre


Hi! Though I got the correct answer, In E the growth exceeds what it(growth) did(exceeded) for the 10,000 years...... seems right to me. Only what seems a bit awkward as it has been used as a pronoun here. Is this the reason to eliminate E? AndrewN GMATNinja GMATGuruNY
Tutor
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Posts: 1315
Own Kudos [?]: 3136 [0]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Send PM
Re: Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did [#permalink]
Expert Reply
pk6969 wrote:
Hi! Though I got the correct answer, In E the growth exceeds what it(growth) did(exceeded) for the 10,000 years...... seems right to me. Only what seems a bit awkward as it has been used as a pronoun here. Is this the reason to eliminate E?


When did stands in for an antecedent verb on the GMAT, the following conditions will generally be satisfied:
1. The sentence compares one complete clause to another, with the use of than or as
2. did serves as the main verb of the second complete clause
3. The two clauses are relatively parallel

OA: Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did during the 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture to 1950
Here, all three conditions are satisfied.
Each colored portion constitutes a complete clause.
The two clauses are compared with the use of than.
The two clauses are relatively parallel in that each is composed of a subject, a verb, and a time modifier.
As a result, it is crystal clear that did is standing in for the simple past tense form of the antecedent verb has grown.
Conveyed meaning:
Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it GREW during the 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture to 1950.

E: The growth of the global economy since 1990 exceeds what it did for the 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture to 1950.
Here, none of the three conditions is satisfied.
The portion in red is not a complete clause but serves as the DIRECT OBJECT of exceeds.
The entirety of E constitutes one complete clause.
Because the three conditions are not satisfied, the meaning conveyed by did is unclear.
Eliminate E.
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6923
Own Kudos [?]: 63673 [1]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
pk6969 wrote:
LM wrote:
Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did during the 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture to 1950.

(A) Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did during the 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture

(B) Since 1990 the growth of the global economy has been more than that during 10,000 years, from when the agriculture began

(C) The growth of the global economy since 1990 exceeds that which had been for 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture

(D) The growth of the global economy since 1990 exceeds what it has been for 10,000 years, from when agriculture began

(E) The growth of the global economy since 1990 exceeds what it did for the 10,000 years from the beginning of agricultre


Hi! Though I got the correct answer, In E the growth exceeds what it(growth) did(exceeded) for the 10,000 years...... seems right to me. Only what seems a bit awkward as it has been used as a pronoun here. Is this the reason to eliminate E? AndrewN GMATNinja GMATGuruNY

Consider the logic of your interpretation. What does it mean for "one growth to exceed what another growth exceeded?" One period's growth might exceed another period's growth. But it makes no sense to write that the second period's growth is also exceeding something. Otherwise, we'd need a third period to compare the second period to.

For starters, we don't have that here. We only have two periods: the growth since 1990 and the growth from the preceding 10,000 years. Also it wouldn't make a whole lot of sense if we did. One thing can exceed another. But it can't exceed what another exceeds.

So (E) isn't wrong because it's awkward. It's wrong because it's incoherent.

The takeaway: you always want to consider an option's meaning before you consider its style, as the latter can be totally subjective.

I hope that clears things up!
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Jan 2022
Posts: 27
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 17
Send PM
Re: Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did [#permalink]
why don't we use past perfect in option A? shouldn't it be "the global eco has grown more than it had?, apparently that 10000 years refer to a span of time before 1990?
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [0]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Jezza wrote:
why don't we use past perfect in option A? shouldn't it be "the global eco has grown more than it had?, apparently that 10000 years refer to a span of time before 1990?


Hello Jezza,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, when the chronology is clear because of terms such as "before/after/when/earlier/later"…or because of clear mention of dates, the use of past perfect tense is not required, though not incorrect either.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 Apr 2022
Posts: 203
Own Kudos [?]: 36 [0]
Given Kudos: 277
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35 (Online)
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did [#permalink]
In option A, what does "did" refer to?

is it grew or had grown?
CEO
CEO
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 3675
Own Kudos [?]: 3528 [2]
Given Kudos: 149
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Send PM
Re: Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
jim441 wrote:
In option A, what does "did" refer to?

is it grew or had grown?

grew.

Rule: "to do" forms of the verb (do/did/does) can stand for the main verb in the sentence. The main verb can be in any tense (for example, in this case "has grown" is present perfect), but do/does depict the main verb in simple present tense, while did depicts the main verb in simple past tense.

So, in this case, did stands for the the simple past tense grew.

p.s. Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses this aspect of "to do" verbs. Have attached the corresponding section of the book, for your reference.
Attachments

to-do verbs.pdf [13.19 KiB]
Downloaded 35 times

GMAT Club Bot
Re: Since 1990 the global economy has grown more than it did [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6923 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne