Q. Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 22 Jan 2017, 04:33

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Q. Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2011
Posts: 68
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 73 [2] , given: 14

Q. Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jul 2011, 12:39
2
KUDOS
20
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

33% (02:15) correct 67% (01:39) wrong based on 883 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Q. Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in a job discrimination case must prove not only that the employer lied about the reasons for dismissal but also that those reasons were discriminatory, plaintiffs in such cases fear that they will have no higher court that they can appeal to when their cases are decided in lower courts.

A) that they can appeal to when their cases are

B) to which to appeal after their cases have been

C) for appealing if their case has been

D) to which they can appeal if their case is

E) that their cases can appeal, if they have been

Please let me know why the answer is what it is. I am not clear on the reasons.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

---Winners do it differently---

If you have any questions
New!
Status: How can I crack Verbal
Joined: 12 May 2011
Posts: 209
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V32
GPA: 3
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 33

Re: Good SC Q with multiple things tested [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jul 2011, 13:12
A re-look at the options and having known that the OA is B makes me say that the tense plays a major factor in choosing the right answer.
I ruled out E as 'cases can't appeal'
There is a 2-3 split in terms of tense (is/are vs has been/have been). i can't get further than this ..
Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2011
Posts: 68
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 14

Re: Good SC Q with multiple things tested [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jul 2011, 13:42
The tense matter struck me... "have been" i.e perfect tense is required here as the flow of events suggest 2 events earlier of which is "deciding of the cases in lower court" and hence, perfect tense for the one happening earlier.. but still the tense error did not strike me while attempting it for the first time.. any catch for such questions?
_________________

---Winners do it differently---

GMAT Pill Representative
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 2050
Location: New York, NY
Followers: 387

Kudos [?]: 1328 [0], given: 8

Re: Good SC Q with multiple things tested [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jul 2011, 19:06
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
RohitKalla wrote:
Q. Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in a job discrimination case must prove not only that the employer lied about the reasons for dismissal but also that those reasons were discriminatory, plaintiffs in such cases fear that they will have no higher court that they can appeal to when their cases are decided in lower courts.

A) that they can appeal to when their cases are

B) to which to appeal after their cases have been

C) for appealing if their case has been

D) to which they can appeal if their case is

E) that their cases can appeal, if they have been

Please let me know why the answer is what it is. I am not clear on the reasons.

The word "that" isn't necessary here. The idiomatic structure "court that they can appeal to" is not preferred on the GMAT. But more telling is the last word in (A): "are" --present tense. You need to present the sentence in such a way that it's clear decisions are made in the lower courts and then afterwards there's some possibility of appeal with higher courts that is suggested in the sentence.

I wasn't so hot on "that" but I did like "to which" in answers (B) and (D).

I actually did not even read the first half of the sentence. I only started reading from the comma:
"plaintiffs in such cases fear that they will have no higher court that they can appeal to when their cases are decided in lower courts."

Between (B) and (D)---(B) uses "have been" while (D) uses "is"---not what we want.

So (B) is what we want. It correctly uses "to which" and also correctly uses "have been."
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3633
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 716

Kudos [?]: 5573 [6] , given: 322

Re: Good SC Q with multiple things tested [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jul 2011, 19:45
6
KUDOS
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
A) that they can appeal to when their cases are – that they can appeal is unidiomatic; secondly use of ‘when’ is inappropriate in that it implies a specific point of time of deciding in the lower courts; use of ‘are’ is wrong since the appeal happens after the lower courts have decided the cases

B) to which to appeal after their cases have been – ‘after’ and ‘have been’ are correct usages; correct choice.

C) for appealing if their case has been – ‘their case’ means that all the plaintiffs are collaborating one single case

D) to which they can appeal if their case is – same as in C

E) that their cases can appeal, if they have been – can cases appeal by themselves – distorted meaning
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2011
Posts: 285
Concentration: General Management, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools: HBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V47
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 188 [0], given: 13

Re: Good SC Q with multiple things tested [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jul 2011, 19:53
RohitKalla wrote:
The tense matter struck me... "have been" i.e perfect tense is required here as the flow of events suggest 2 events earlier of which is "deciding of the cases in lower court" and hence, perfect tense for the one happening earlier.. but still the tense error did not strike me while attempting it for the first time.. any catch for such questions?

Do you split youur answer choices? If you do, you will see options are divided into ending with is, are or have been. then the tense matter would strike, since you have to decide between these..
Status: How can I crack Verbal
Joined: 12 May 2011
Posts: 209
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V32
GPA: 3
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 33

Re: Good SC Q with multiple things tested [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jul 2011, 23:20
Thanks Zeke and Daagh for the explanations, but i have not understood why C is wrong. What if the plaintiffs are indeed collaborating on a single case (absurd but when i answered the question, i only looked at the S-V agreement of 'case' and 'has'),in which case 'C' can also be correct or does it distort the author's intended meaning?
Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2011
Posts: 68
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 14

Re: Good SC Q with multiple things tested [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jul 2011, 03:38
Thanks Daagg and Vivesomnium. Yeah i do split my choices.. Now am wondering what was i doin with my brain while attempting this quest
_________________

---Winners do it differently---

Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 258
Schools: UNC Duke Kellogg
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 40 [1] , given: 4

Re: Good SC Q with multiple things tested [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jul 2011, 10:45
1
KUDOS
Nice question this...

Here is a completely different approach to this problem:

First -- Understand the meaning of the sentence -- What is the author saying? -- The Supreme Court has made some rulings that are not very favorable to the plaintiffs. So the plaintiffs feel that they may not be able to appeal to a higher court.

So which of these choices actually conveys this information properly?

Only Choice B -- why? The key is to understand the meaning of the sentence -- the keyword is "after" --- when do you appeal to a higher court?? -- You appeal to a higher court "after" your case has been decided unfavorably in a lower court.

SC can be tackled without getting bogged down by tenses, voices, tones etc.
Manager
Status: ==GMAT Ninja==
Joined: 08 Jan 2011
Posts: 247
Schools: ISB, IIMA ,SP Jain , XLRI
WE 1: Aditya Birla Group (sales)
WE 2: Saint Gobain Group (sales)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 46

Re: Good SC Q with multiple things tested [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jul 2011, 11:34
daagh wrote:
A) that they can appeal to when their cases are – that they can appeal is unidiomatic; secondly use of ‘when’ is inappropriate in that it implies a specific point of time of deciding in the lower courts; use of ‘are’ is wrong since the appeal happens after the lower courts have decided the cases

B) to which to appeal after their cases have been – ‘after’ and ‘have been’ are correct usages; correct choice.

C) for appealing if their case has been – ‘their case’ means that all the plaintiffs are collaborating one single case

D) to which they can appeal if their case is – same as in C

E) that their cases can appeal, if they have been – can cases appeal by themselves – distorted meaning

Great explanation daagh for dumb people like me.......
_________________

WarLocK
_____________________________________________________________________________
The War is oNNNNNNNNNNNNN for 720+
see my Test exp here http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-test-experience-111610.html
do not hesitate me giving kudos if you like my post.

Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Posts: 367
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 119 [0], given: 291

Re: Q. Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2013, 18:52
D is out because case is singular and we need cases for the sentence to make sense. Hence (B)
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10538
Followers: 919

Kudos [?]: 204 [1] , given: 0

Re: Q. Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jan 2015, 03:23
1
KUDOS
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10538
Followers: 919

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 0

Re: Q. Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 May 2016, 01:47
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Q. Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution   [#permalink] 21 May 2016, 01:47
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
8 Because the Supreme Court has ruled that 11 07 May 2014, 18:28
5 Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in 8 20 Nov 2012, 05:29
1 Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in 4 29 Oct 2012, 21:43
8 Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in 7 01 Sep 2012, 06:02
1 Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in 13 09 Jan 2008, 07:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by