Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Jul 2014, 17:22

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Twenty years ago, Balzania put in place regulations

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
2 KUDOS received
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1226
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 52 [2] , given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Twenty years ago, Balzania put in place regulations [#permalink] New post 24 Dec 2004, 21:49
2
This post received
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (medium)

Question Stats:

52% (02:14) correct 48% (01:47) wrong based on 386 sessions
Twenty years ago, Balzania put in place regulations requiring operators of surface mines to pay for the reclamation of mined-out land. Since then, reclamation technology has not improved. Yet, the average reclamation cost for a surface coal mine being reclaimed today is only four dollars per ton of coal that the mine produced, less than half what it cost to reclaim surface mines in the years immediately after the regulations took effect.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to account for the drop in reclamation costs described?

A. Even after Balzania began requiring surface mine operators to pay reclamation costs, coal mines in Balzania continued to be less expensive to operate than coal mines in almost any other country.
B. In the twenty years since the regulations took effect, the use of coal as a fuel has declined from the level it was at in the previous twenty years.
C. Mine operators have generally ceased surface mining in the mountainous areas of Balzania because reclamation costs per ton of coal produced are particularly high for mines in such areas.
D. Even after Balzania began requiring surface mine operators to pay reclamation costs, surface mines continued to produce coal at a lower total cost than underground mines.
E. As compared to twenty years ago, a greater percentage of the coal mined in Balzania today comes from surface mines.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
3 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2255
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 189 [3] , given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR:Balzania [#permalink] New post 11 Jun 2005, 20:06
3
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Fact: 20 years ago a regulation started.
Fact: tech not improved since then.
Fact: cost is halved.

Ask for explanation.


A. Even after Balzania began requiring surface mine operators to pay reclamation costs, coal mines in Balzania continued to be less expensive to operate than coal mines in almost any other country.
Talk about cost of coal mines, not reclamatin of coal mines, irrelevant.

B. In the twenty years since the regulations took effect, the use of coal as a fuel has declined from the level it was at in the previous twenty years.
Talks about use of coal. Irrelevant.

C. Mine operators have generally ceased surface mining in the mountainous areas of Balzania because reclamation costs per ton of coal produced are particularly high for mines in such areas.
This explains the drop in average cost. The reason is high cost area do not get to be used any more.

D. Even after Balzania began requiring surface mine operators to pay reclamation costs, surface mines continued to produce coal at a lower total cost than underground mines.
Talks about coal costs. Irrelevant.

E. As compared to twenty years ago, a greater percentage of the coal mined in Balzania today comes from surface mines.
Do not explain why the reclaimation cost would decrease when more surface mines are used.

C
_________________

Keep on asking, and it will be given you;
keep on seeking, and you will find;
keep on knocking, and it will be opened to you.

2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 76
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [2] , given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Jun 2005, 17:47
2
This post received
KUDOS
I don't see the reasons behind why "B" is correct. Could you please explain.

I'll go with C on this one.

Why I think B is wrong:
We are talking about X = [$cost/1ton], Lets assume that they were mining 20 mines before (hence need to fix 20 of them). Because the consumption came down, say they need to mine only 10 now (hence they need to fix only 10). - So, X remains the same, isn't it?
The above assumes, that all mines produce the same amt of coal on an average. Hence, I don't see why X goes down.

Why I think E is wrong:
This one talks about "percentage" and should be very careful. You could get more percentage by not changing anything with surface-mining from 20 yrs ago and just taking down the production from underground mines. Hence, this does not give any information about surface mines.

I'm curious to know what the OA is.
-FM
Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1758
Followers: 1193

Kudos [?]: 3198 [1] , given: 179

Re: Twenty years ago, Balzania put in place regulations [#permalink] New post 19 Feb 2013, 21:31
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
@targetgmatchotu - I dont believe you are reading the question correctly. The reclamation costs refer only to the coal produced from surface mines, not the total coal produced. Hence, the reclamation costs/ton of coal do not change regardless of whether surface mine satisfy half or country's demand or 20% of the demand.

-Rajat
_________________



Free Webinar: August 03, 2014 - Improve by 70 Points in 30 days: Register for this Free Webinar to learn how to define your strategy, analyze your mocks and improve by 70 points in 30 days. Click here to register.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2004
Posts: 96
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Dec 2004, 22:17
E is the best answer.

Here is my reasoning.
Technology not improved...greater percentage of coal is mined in surface mines...results in lower reclamation cost per ton of coal produced...
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Dec 2004
Posts: 51
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 25 Dec 2004, 08:17
But in order to choose E, don't you have to know that the number of coal mines has stayed the same?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2004
Posts: 96
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 25 Dec 2004, 09:50
Good question. Here is the key: "the average reclamation cost for a surface coal mine being reclaimed today is only four dollars per ton of coal that the mine produced".

Here average cost per ton of coal mined is discussed. Hence, E the best answer.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Dec 2004
Posts: 24
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 25 Dec 2004, 10:08
I think C is better coz....

A - Not comparing cost in Balzania and other countries;
B - it is related to demand but not cost;
D - Not comparing surface and underground mine;

C and E left

For E, larger % from surface mine, as we donno the change in absolute total cost and total quantity, may or may not reduce the cost per ton

But for C, if we remove the higher cost per ton from the portfolio, the average cost per tone will drop

So C is the answer.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1226
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 27 Dec 2004, 09:42
Hello, the OA should be C, here is my reasoning.

In this question, we can assume there are two kinds of mining methods, one is surface mining which needs to pay and the other is underground mining which needs not to pay.
Then we compare the two mining periods. We can assume...

1:THe years immediately after the regulation took effect

The total cost is $400, and the total tons of coal including surface and underground are 2 tons. So, we get the average cost $200 per ton.

2: Today
The total cost is still 400, because surface mining is ceased. However, the total tons of coal are still increasing. We can assume 4 tons of coal . Then, the average cost will be $100 per ton.

Therefore, the OA is C.

How do you think? Am I right?

Thank you
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2005
Posts: 273
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR:Balzania [#permalink] New post 10 Jun 2005, 15:28
ttar wrote:
Twenty years ago, Balzania put in place regulations requiring operators of surface mines
to pay for the reclamation of mined-out land. Since then, reclamation technology has not
improved. Yet, the average reclamation cost for a surface coal mine being reclaimed
today is only four dollars per ton of coal that the mine produced, less than half what it
cost to reclaim surface mines in the years immediately after the regulations took effect.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to account for the drop in reclamation costs
described?

A. Even after Balzania began requiring surface mine operators to pay reclamation
costs, coal mines in Balzania continued to be less expensive to operate than coal
mines in almost any other country.
B. In the twenty years since the regulations took effect, the use of coal as a fuel has
declined from the level it was at in the previous twenty years.
C. Mine operators have generally ceased surface mining in the mountainous areas of
Balzania because reclamation costs per ton of coal produced are particularly high
for mines in such areas.
D. Even after Balzania began requiring surface mine operators to pay reclamation
costs, surface mines continued to produce coal at a lower total cost than
underground mines.
E. As compared to twenty years ago, a greater percentage of the coal mined in
Balzania today comes from surface mines.


wow! can barely understand the question...
A is irrelevant
B...amount of coal used doesnt make a difference as they are talking about average cost of reclamation per ton of coal
C...irrelevant due to similar reasons as B
D...comparison to underground mines is irrelevant
E however could explain it...if more coal is produced in a particular area...amount of land per ton of coal is less, thus reducing the cost of reclamation

hence my answer is E
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 18 Apr 2005
Posts: 551
Location: Canuckland
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 12 Jun 2005, 00:00
C. directly addresses costs of reclamation

E is close but irrelavant since since less dug-up soil has no direct bearing on reclamation costs per ton. ton is still a ton

Last edited by sparky on 12 Jun 2005, 16:01, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 104
Location: Austin, Texas
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Re: CR:Balzania [#permalink] New post 12 Jun 2005, 15:37
ttar wrote:
Twenty years ago, Balzania put in place regulations requiring operators of surface mines to pay for the reclamation of mined-out land. Since then, reclamation technology has not improved. Yet, the average reclamation cost for a surface coal mine being reclaimed today is only four dollars per ton of coal that the mine produced, less than half what it cost to reclaim surface mines in the years immediately after the regulations took effect. Which of the following, if true, most helps to account for the drop in reclamation costs
described?

C. Mine operators have generally ceased surface mining in the mountainous areas of Balzania because reclamation costs per ton of coal produced are particularly high for mines in such areas.


(C).
Often, more productive technology makes things cheaper over time. But that is NOT the case here. If not better technology, it must be something about how mines are operated when in use, that makes their later reclamation cheaper. (C) addresses this: mine operators are now working locations that are cheaper to reclaim.

(The only alternate explanation would be, say, general deflation making everything cheaper. But that's not an answer choice).
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1902
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR # Balzania [#permalink] New post 05 Nov 2005, 20:08
nakib77 wrote:
Twenty years ago, Balzania put in place regulations requiring operators of surface mines
to pay for the reclamation of mined-out land. Since then, reclamation technology has not
improved
. Yet, the average reclamation cost for a surface coal mine being reclaimed
today is only four dollars per ton of coal that the mine produced, less than half what it
cost to reclaim surface mines in the years immediately after the regulations took effect.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to account for the drop in reclamation costs
described?

A. Even after Balzania began requiring surface mine operators to pay reclamation
costs, coal mines in Balzania continued to be less expensive to operate than coal
mines in almost any other country.
B. In the twenty years since the regulations took effect, the use of coal as a fuel has
declined from the level it was at in the previous twenty years.
C. Mine operators have generally ceased surface mining in the mountainous areas of
Balzania because reclamation costs per ton of coal produced are particularly high
for mines in such areas.
D. Even after Balzania began requiring surface mine operators to pay reclamation
costs, surface mines continued to produce coal at a lower total cost than
underground mines.
E. As compared to twenty years ago, a greater percentage of the coal mined in
Balzania today comes from surface mines.


I came down to B and E coz both describe the relationship between demand and supply, which can support the conclusion. But " greater" in E makes the choice unfavorable coz of the bold part in the passage. I choose B.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1743
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 05 Nov 2005, 23:22
it is not B.

keep trying.... a clue here is average cost
_________________

hey ya......

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 05 Nov 2005
Posts: 232
Location: Germany
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR # Balzania [#permalink] New post 06 Nov 2005, 06:45
I am not sure but I would opt for C.

The passage deals with surface coal mines. Operators must pay reclamations which would make the cost more expensive, yet the average cost has fallen. The reason could be that the operators have eschwewed mining in the mountainous regions which would lower the cost. Hence C.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 1351
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Mines [#permalink] New post 02 May 2006, 11:36
Should be C. this is the only choice that expalins the discripancy that the average costs reduced to half what was when the regulation took effect..
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 352
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 03 May 2006, 00:10
How to decide b/w B and C? Both seem to be fine.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 102
Schools: Tuck, Duke
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: CR#tough2 share the explanations [#permalink] New post 30 Aug 2008, 06:09
Cost is 4$/ton--which is 1/2 of what it was 20 yrs ago...
Only E is making sense
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2007
Posts: 35
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: CR#tough2 share the explanations [#permalink] New post 30 Aug 2008, 06:53
C. Mine operators have generally ceased surface mining in the mountainous areas of Balzania because reclamation costs per ton of coal produced are particularly high for mines in such areas.
-- > This explains why the overall cost of reclamation went down in these years.

E is tempting but "greater percentage of the coal mined" could have been due to other types of mines being shut down. The ideal answer would have been "more coal being produced by these mines" but that is not given in any of the choices.

IMO, C comes close to explain why reclamation costs could go down.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 950
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR#tough2 share the explanations [#permalink] New post 30 Aug 2008, 07:10
IMO C.
Since Surface mine are no longer used, so there reclamation cost has gone down.
Re: CR#tough2 share the explanations   [#permalink] 30 Aug 2008, 07:10
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic Twenty years ago, Balzania put in place regulations requirin Zatmah 2 24 Feb 2014, 07:29
Twenty years ago, Balzania put in place regulations anish123ster 0 07 Apr 2013, 01:07
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic CR Twenty years ago. Vavali 14 29 Mar 2008, 13:34
Twenty years ago, Balzania put in place regulations ttar 0 27 Jan 2012, 16:15
Twenty years ago, Balzania put in place regulations chunjuwu 0 27 Dec 2004, 09:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Twenty years ago, Balzania put in place regulations

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 40 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.