Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. But of this [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Mar 2009, 23:18

4

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

67% (02:11) correct
33% (01:13) wrong based on 140 sessions

HideShow timer Statictics

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. But of this amount earned simple annual interest at the rate of x percent per year, and the rest earned simple annual interest at the rate of y percent per year. If the total interest earned by the $60,000 for that year was $4,080, what is the value of x?

(1) x = (3/4) y (2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2.

A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. But of this amount earned simple annual interest at the rate of x percent per year, and the rest earned simple annual interest at the rate of y percent per year. If the total interest earned by the $60,000 for that year was $4,080, what is the value of x? (1) x = (3/4) y (2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2. A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient. B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient. C. BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient. D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient. E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

IMO it should be C

1. Is insuff as we don't about the split. 2. Lets assume that split is a and b ( b=60,000-a)

AX/100 / (60,000-b)Y/100 = 3/2 and We also know that AX/100 + (60,000-A)Y/100 = 4080. We have 2 equations and 3 variables and hence insuff ( I triesd to calculate also just to be sure)

Now we combine 1 and 2, we have 3 equations and 3 variables and hence we can solve it.

A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. But of this amount earned simple annual interest at the rate of x percent per year, and the rest earned simple annual interest at the rate of y percent per year. If the total interest earned by the $60,000 for that year was $4,080, what is the value of x?

(1) x = (3/4) y

(2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2.

---- Let A be the investment with x interest rate and B be the investment with y interest rate. First, let us process the information we are given:

A + B = 60,000 A * x/100 + B * y/100 = 4,080

We are asked what is x? so A * x/100 + (60,000 - A) * y/100 = 4,080. We can stop here and recognize that we need A and y to find x or A per say and a relationship between x and y.

1) We have a relationship between x and y that helps to get rid of y but we still need A. Insuff. A D out

2) Here the GMAT is telling us each of the interest amount of investments A and B. However there are many combinations of A, x and B, y to get the respective splits. Insuff. B out

1+2) We have each investment interest expressed in terms of A and x. We can isolate A * x/100 so A interest in the formula for B interest ( (60,000 - A) * y/100)) after replacing y with x, and replace it with its dollar amount. We end up with an equation with only one variable - x - and solve sufficienty.

A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. But of this amount earned simple annual interest at the rate of x percent per year, and the rest earned simple annual interest at the rate of y percent per year. If the total interest earned by the $60,000 for that year was $4,080, what is the value of x? (1) x = (3/4) y (2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2.

Application of weighted average - Some amount at x% and some at y%. Total interest earned is $4080. So we can find the average interest earned (4080/60,000). So weighted average of x and y is (4080/60,000). What is x? We do not know the ratio of principal (i.e. the weights) and we have two variables x and y. (1) x = (3/4) y A variable reduced but the ratio of weights is still not known.

(2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2.

Got the ratio of weights but still have 2 variables.

Both together, now I have the ratio of weights and just one variable x, so definitely I will get the value of x using w1/w2 = (A2 - Aavg)/(Aavg - A1) 3/2 = (4/3x% - 4080/60,000)/(4080/60,000 - x%)

Ofcourse, it is a DS question so I will not try to find it but I could so sufficient. Answer (C). _________________

A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. But of this amount earned simple annual interest at the rate of x percent per year, and the rest earned simple annual interest at the rate of y percent per year. If the total interest earned by the $60,000 for that year was $4,080, what is the value of x? (1) x = (3/4) y (2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2.

Application of weighted average - Some amount at x% and some at y%. Total interest earned is $4080. So we can find the average interest earned (4080/60,000). So weighted average of x and y is (4080/60,000). What is x? We do not know the ratio of principal (i.e. the weights) and we have two variables x and y. (1) x = (3/4) y A variable reduced but the ratio of weights is still not known.

(2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2.

Got the ratio of weights but still have 2 variables.

Both together, now I have the ratio of weights and just one variable x, so definitely I will get the value of x using w1/w2 = (A2 - Aavg)/(Aavg - A1) 3/2 = (4/3x% - 4080/60,000)/(4080/60,000 - x%)

Ofcourse, it is a DS question so I will not try to find it but I could so sufficient. Answer (C).

A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. But of this amount earned simple annual interest at the rate of x percent per year, and the rest earned simple annual interest at the rate of y percent per year. If the total interest earned by the $60,000 for that year was $4,080, what is the value of x? (1) x = (3/4) y (2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2.

Application of weighted average - Some amount at x% and some at y%. Total interest earned is $4080. So we can find the average interest earned (4080/60,000). So weighted average of x and y is (4080/60,000). What is x? We do not know the ratio of principal (i.e. the weights) and we have two variables x and y. (1) x = (3/4) y A variable reduced but the ratio of weights is still not known.

(2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2.

Got the ratio of weights but still have 2 variables.

Both together, now I have the ratio of weights and just one variable x, so definitely I will get the value of x using w1/w2 = (A2 - Aavg)/(Aavg - A1) 3/2 = (4/3x% - 4080/60,000)/(4080/60,000 - x%)

Ofcourse, it is a DS question so I will not try to find it but I could so sufficient. Answer (C).

Hi Karishma,

I have been following your solutions. They are an eye opener for me. Now I am stuck in this problem with my approach. Request you to kindly help reason out why I can't take this approach.

From statement 1 x=3y/4 so x/y=3/4 hence I can take x=3 and y=4. since I know the interest which is 4080 and the ratio of interest 3 and 4 can't I apply these 4080/7*3 to calculate x.

If I can't take this approach in this question then under what question can this approach be taken

A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. But of this amount earned simple annual interest at the rate of x percent per year, and the rest earned simple annual interest at the rate of y percent per year. If the total interest earned by the $60,000 for that year was $4,080, what is the value of x? (1) x = (3/4) y (2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2.

Application of weighted average - Some amount at x% and some at y%. Total interest earned is $4080. So we can find the average interest earned (4080/60,000). So weighted average of x and y is (4080/60,000). What is x? We do not know the ratio of principal (i.e. the weights) and we have two variables x and y. (1) x = (3/4) y A variable reduced but the ratio of weights is still not known.

(2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2.

Got the ratio of weights but still have 2 variables.

Both together, now I have the ratio of weights and just one variable x, so definitely I will get the value of x using w1/w2 = (A2 - Aavg)/(Aavg - A1) 3/2 = (4/3x% - 4080/60,000)/(4080/60,000 - x%)

Ofcourse, it is a DS question so I will not try to find it but I could so sufficient. Answer (C).

Hi Karishma,

I have been following your solutions. They are an eye opener for me. Now I am stuck in this problem with my approach. Request you to kindly help reason out why I can't take this approach.

From statement 1 x=3y/4 so x/y=3/4 hence I can take x=3 and y=4. since I know the interest which is 4080 and the ratio of interest 3 and 4 can't I apply these 4080/7*3 to calculate x.

If I can't take this approach in this question then under what question can this approach be taken

Of the 60,000, say I invest 30,000 at x% and 30,000 at y%. Now if x/y = 3/4, the actual interest earned by two investments will be in the ratio 3:4 so you can calculate interest earned ta x% using 4080/7*3 and hence can get the value of x.

But say, I invest 10,000 at x% and 50,000 at y% (I don't know how the principal is split), will the actual interest earned at x% and at y% be in the ratio 3:4? No. Actual Interest earned at x% will be much less than actual interest earned at y% because amount invested at x% is very little.

Hence, we need the way the principal was split to get the ratio of interest earned. _________________

Re: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. But of this [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Aug 2013, 03:23

Economist wrote:

A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. But of this amount earned simple annual interest at the rate of x percent per year, and the rest earned simple annual interest at the rate of y percent per year. If the total interest earned by the $60,000 for that year was $4,080, what is the value of x? (1) x = (3/4) y (2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2. A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient. B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient. C. BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient. D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient. E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

................ From question, P × X% + (60000-p)y%=4080 ..................(1) {P = portion of amount that gained X% interest}

from st(1), x= (3/4)y , put it in equation (1) and we will have a negative value of P. so (1) not sufficient. [calculate it, because it could be positive, i have seen a lot of these types of problems]

from st(2), we know , 3m+2m=60,000 or, m = 12,000 .

so, 3 × 12,000 X% + 2 × 12,000 Y% = 4080 [st(2) is not sufficient to solve the problem}

Now use the value of y from st(1) and you will have X=6 . so its only possible by using both statements to evaluate X .

Thus Answer is (C). {this is nothing but a problem regarding calculation and within 2 minutes it's possible to calculate and answer this question} _________________

So, my final tally is in. I applied to three b schools in total this season: INSEAD – admitted MIT Sloan – admitted Wharton – waitlisted and dinged No...

A few weeks ago, the following tweet popped up in my timeline. thanks @Uber_Mumbai for showing me what #daylightrobbery means!I know I have a choice not to use it...

“This elective will be most relevant to learn innovative methodologies in digital marketing in a place which is the origin for major marketing companies.” This was the crux...