Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 19 Nov 2011
Posts: 6

A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 28 Jan 2012, 04:22
Question Stats:
57% (02:20) correct 43% (02:11) wrong based on 1870 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this amount earned simple annual interest at the rate of x percent per year, and the rest earned simple annual interest at the rate of y percent per year. If the total interest earned by the $60,000 for that year was $4,080, what is the value of x? (1) x = 3y/4 (2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
Originally posted by RadhaKrishnan on 28 Jan 2012, 04:05.
Last edited by Bunuel on 28 Jan 2012, 04:22, edited 1 time in total.
Added the OA




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59182

RadhaKrishnan wrote: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this amount earned simple annual interest at the rate of x percent per year, and the rest earned simple annual interest at the rate of y percent per year. If the total interest earned by the $60,000 for that year was $4,080, what is the value of x?
(1) x = 3y/4 (2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2. Let the amount invested at x% be \(a\), then the amount invested at y% would be \(60,000a\). Given: \(a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000a)\frac{y}{100}=4,080\) (we have 3 unknowns \(x\), \(y\), and \(a\)). Question: \(x=?\) (1) \(x=\frac{3}{4}y\) > \(y=\frac{4x}{3}\) > \(a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000a)\frac{4x}{3*100}=4,080\) > still 2 unknowns  \(x\) and \(a\). Not sufficient. (2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2 > \(\frac{a}{60,000a}=\frac{3}{2}\) > \(a=36,000\) > \(36,000*\frac{x}{100}+(60,00036,000)\frac{y}{100}=4,080\) > still 2 unknowns  \(x\) and \(y\). Not sufficient. (1)+(2) From (1) \(a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000a)\frac{4x}{3*100}=4,080\) and from (2) \(a=36,000\) > only 1 unknown  \(x\), hence we can solve for it. Sufficient. Answer: C.
_________________




Manager
Joined: 22 Sep 2011
Posts: 201

Re: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Jan 2012, 05:21
Thanks for the detailed explanation Bunuel.



Manager
Status: Do till 740 :)
Joined: 13 Jun 2011
Posts: 79
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GPA: 3.6
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)

Re: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Feb 2012, 19:58
Quote: Let the amount invested at x% be a, then the amount invested at y% would be 60,000a.
Given: a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000a)\frac{y}{100}=4,080 (we have 3 unknowns x, y, and a). Question: x=?
(1) x=\frac{3}{4}y > y=\frac{4x}{3} > a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000a)\frac{4x}{3*100}=4,080 > still 2 unknowns  x and a. Not sufficient.
(2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2 > \frac{a}{60,000a}=\frac{3}{2} > a=36,000 > 36,000*\frac{x}{100}+(60,00036,000)\frac{y}{100}=4,080 > still 2 unknowns  x and y. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) From (1) a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000a)\frac{4x}{3*100}=4,080 and from (2) a=36,000 > only 1 unknown  x, hence we can solve for it. Sufficient.
Hi bunuel, Your expert thoughts on a clarification I have got , when you have a equation in some problems there is only one solution and we can arrive on a unique value. such that no other values of x or y can satisy that equation. In the stmt above i spent 30 secs thinking if a unique solution would be available! how do we coem to a conclusion tat there is not unique solution and we can say its not sufficeint like stmt 2?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59182

Re: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Feb 2012, 01:43
shankar245 wrote: Quote: Let the amount invested at x% be a, then the amount invested at y% would be 60,000a.
Given: a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000a)\frac{y}{100}=4,080 (we have 3 unknowns x, y, and a). Question: x=?
(1) x=\frac{3}{4}y > y=\frac{4x}{3} > a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000a)\frac{4x}{3*100}=4,080 > still 2 unknowns  x and a. Not sufficient.
(2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2 > \frac{a}{60,000a}=\frac{3}{2} > a=36,000 > 36,000*\frac{x}{100}+(60,00036,000)\frac{y}{100}=4,080 > still 2 unknowns  x and y. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) From (1) a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000a)\frac{4x}{3*100}=4,080 and from (2) a=36,000 > only 1 unknown  x, hence we can solve for it. Sufficient.
Hi bunuel, Your expert thoughts on a clarification I have got , when you have a equation in some problems there is only one solution and we can arrive on a unique value. such that no other values of x or y can satisy that equation. In the stmt above i spent 30 secs thinking if a unique solution would be available! how do we coem to a conclusion tat there is not unique solution and we can say its not sufficeint like stmt 2? In statement (1) for any value of \(x\) there will exist some \(a\) to satisfy this equation (and vise versa), notice that \(a\) and \(x\) are not integers so we have no restriction on them whatsoever (mathematically we have an equation of a hyperbola and it has infinitely many solutions for x and a). The same for statement (2). Most of the time when there might be only one solution for two unknowns you'll have linear equation and a restriction that these unknowns can be integers only (Diophantine equation). For more on this type of questions check: eunicesoldseveralcakesifeachcakesoldforeither109602.htmlmarthaboughtseveralpencilsifeachpencilwaseithera100204.htmlarentalcaragencypurchasesfleetvehiclesintwosizesa105682.htmljoeboughtonlytwentycentstampsandthirtycentstamps106212.htmlacertainfruitstandsoldapplesfor070eachandbananas101966.htmljoannaboughtonly015stampsand029stampshowmany101743.htmlHope it helps.
_________________



Manager
Status: Do till 740 :)
Joined: 13 Jun 2011
Posts: 79
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GPA: 3.6
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)

Re: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Feb 2012, 05:09
[b]Lovely .[/b]



Intern
Status: Fighting Gravity..
Joined: 25 May 2012
Posts: 27
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V35 GMAT 2: 750 Q50 V41
GPA: 3.25
WE: Programming (Computer Software)

Re: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jun 2012, 07:54
One question... Why are we not considering the time for which each investment was made? isnt the formula for Interest earned = P x R X T/100 ?? Apologise if its a dumb question



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59182

Re: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jun 2012, 08:01
ankushgrover wrote: One question... Why are we not considering the time for which each investment was made? isnt the formula for Interest earned = P x R X T/100 ?? Apologise if its a dumb question Welcome to GMAT Club. Below is an answer for your question. We are told that "A total of $60,000 was invested for one year", so we can omit multiplying by 1. For more on this kind of problems please check: mathnumbertheorypercents91708.htmlHope it helps.
_________________



Intern
Status: Fighting Gravity..
Joined: 25 May 2012
Posts: 27
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V35 GMAT 2: 750 Q50 V41
GPA: 3.25
WE: Programming (Computer Software)

Re: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jun 2012, 08:24
But when we are breaking it into 2 parts 'a' and '60,000  a' , wouldn't it matter if i invested 'a' for 2 months or 10 months? The interest amount of 4080 can come for a specific duration only, right?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59182

Re: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jun 2012, 08:27
ankushgrover wrote: But when we are breaking it into 2 parts 'a' and '60,000  a' , wouldn't it matter if i invested 'a' for 2 months or 10 months? The interest amount of 4080 can come for a specific duration only, right? It follows from the stem that both \(a\) and \(60,000a\) were invested for one year. Hope it's clear.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 11 Sep 2012
Posts: 6
Location: Norway
Concentration: Healthcare, International Business
GMAT Date: 11192013
WE: Brand Management (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)

Re: A total of 6000 was invested
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Oct 2012, 07:36
Could someone please explain in detail why A (amount) is taken into the equation? In my mind, when we have x and y %'s this is what we need to calculate the partial amounts as well...? Bunuel wrote: Merging similar topics. TomB wrote: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. But of this amount earned simple annual interest at the rate of x percent per year, and the rest earned simple annual interest at the rate of y percent per year. If the total interest earned by the $60,000 for that year was $4,080, what is the value of x?
(1) x = (3/4) y (2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2.
according to stmnt (2) x=3/2, y=2/5.Let A= amount invested in x%,B=60000A is amount invested in y%.
A(x%)+b(y%)=4080 A(3/5)+(60000A)(2/5)=4080. if i solve this equation i am getting negative value. Is the above method correct . The red part is not correct. We are given that the ratio of two amounts is 3 to 2 not the ratio of interest rates. For complete solutions refer to the posts above. Hope it helps.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59182

Re: A total of 6000 was invested
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Oct 2012, 07:45
asveaass wrote: Could someone please explain in detail why A (amount) is taken into the equation? In my mind, when we have x and y %'s this is what we need to calculate the partial amounts as well...? The amount invested at x% is \(a\) and the amount invested at y% is \(60,000a\). We need to find the value of x. Can you please tell what confuses you here?
_________________



Intern
Joined: 20 Nov 2011
Posts: 33

Re: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jul 2013, 06:31
Hi guys.
I want to explain my moreabstract solution for this question. A kind of solution one require for answering a DS question in an efficient way.
First lets model what the question put in our table. Consider the part of investment that have x percent interest A and the other part (60kA). Now what we have is this: Ax+(60kA)y = 4080
Now lets begin from statement 1: It says that x=(3/4)y. If we put this equation into the original model then we got nothing. Why? because what we got is 1 equation with 2 unknown variables. so cross off statement 1.
Now statement 2: we got A/(60kA)=3/2. Like the first statement if we plug this equation into original one we still have 1 equation with 2 unknown variables. Now statement 2 is out too.
1+2: from statement 2 we can draw that the 60k investment has 5 part (because the ration of two parts was 3:2) then we can calculate that each part is 12k (60k/5). Now if we plug statement 1 into the original model we got 1 equation with 1 unknown parameter. Problem solved. The answer is C.
My main point here was to stress that for solving DS question try to avoid doing the problem with math concepts only. If you see that you reach to the point that the equation has an unique answer then pick the right answer choice and go ahead!



Manager
Joined: 12 Jan 2013
Posts: 142

Re: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Jan 2014, 06:54
RadhaKrishnan wrote: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this amount earned simple annual interest at the rate of x percent per year, and the rest earned simple annual interest at the rate of y percent per year. If the total interest earned by the $60,000 for that year was $4,080, what is the value of x?
(1) x = 3y/4 (2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2. We're given \(((a)*6000*\frac{x}{100}) + ((1  a) * 6000 * \frac{y}{100}) = 4080\) Where a and (1  a) indicate the fraction of 60,000 that's invested at x and y percent, respectively. What we really need is NOT the values of a, x, and y, we need a RELATIONSHIP between a and (1  a) and relationship between x and y 1) Only gives us relationship between x and y, we know nothing about a and (1  a), insufficient 2) Only gives us relationship of a and (1  a), we know nothing about the relationship between x and y 1 + 2 we're given both relationships, this is sufficient. Answer is C



Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2013
Posts: 227

Bunuel wrote: RadhaKrishnan wrote: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this amount earned simple annual interest at the rate of x percent per year, and the rest earned simple annual interest at the rate of y percent per year. If the total interest earned by the $60,000 for that year was $4,080, what is the value of x?
(1) x = 3y/4 (2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2. Let the amount invested at x% be \(a\), then the amount invested at y% would be \(60,000a\). Given: \(a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000a)\frac{y}{100}=4,080\) (we have 3 unknowns \(x\), \(y\), and \(a\)). Question: \(x=?\) (1) \(x=\frac{3}{4}y\) > \(y=\frac{4x}{3}\) > \(a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000a)\frac{4x}{3*100}=4,080\) > still 2 unknowns  \(x\) and \(a\). Not sufficient. (2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2 > \(\frac{a}{60,000a}=\frac{3}{2}\) > \(a=36,000\) > \(36,000*\frac{x}{100}+(60,00036,000)\frac{y}{100}=4,080\) > still 2 unknowns  \(x\) and \(y\). Not sufficient. (1)+(2) From (1) \(a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000a)\frac{4x}{3*100}=4,080\) and from (2) \(a=36,000\) > only 1 unknown  \(x\), hence we can solve for it. Sufficient. Answer: C. Hi Bunuel, This makes complete sense in retrospec but I tried to solve using the weighted avg formula: W1/W2 = A2Avg/AvgA1 I realize that the Avg is 6.8% but I was thrown off by the values of W1/W2 and A2, A1. Is w1 and w2 supposed to be the amount that accrues interest rate 1 and 2, or in this case, x and y? Thanks.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59182

russ9 wrote: Bunuel wrote: RadhaKrishnan wrote: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this amount earned simple annual interest at the rate of x percent per year, and the rest earned simple annual interest at the rate of y percent per year. If the total interest earned by the $60,000 for that year was $4,080, what is the value of x?
(1) x = 3y/4 (2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2. Let the amount invested at x% be \(a\), then the amount invested at y% would be \(60,000a\). Given: \(a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000a)\frac{y}{100}=4,080\) (we have 3 unknowns \(x\), \(y\), and \(a\)). Question: \(x=?\) (1) \(x=\frac{3}{4}y\) > \(y=\frac{4x}{3}\) > \(a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000a)\frac{4x}{3*100}=4,080\) > still 2 unknowns  \(x\) and \(a\). Not sufficient. (2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2 > \(\frac{a}{60,000a}=\frac{3}{2}\) > \(a=36,000\) > \(36,000*\frac{x}{100}+(60,00036,000)\frac{y}{100}=4,080\) > still 2 unknowns  \(x\) and \(y\). Not sufficient. (1)+(2) From (1) \(a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000a)\frac{4x}{3*100}=4,080\) and from (2) \(a=36,000\) > only 1 unknown  \(x\), hence we can solve for it. Sufficient. Answer: C. Hi Bunuel, This makes complete sense in retrospec but I tried to solve using the weighted avg formula: W1/W2 = A2Avg/AvgA1 I realize that the Avg is 6.8% but I was thrown off by the values of W1/W2 and A2, A1. Is w1 and w2 supposed to be the amount that accrues interest rate 1 and 2, or in this case, x and y? Thanks. \(4x = 3y\) \(\frac{y6.8}{6.8x}=\frac{3}{2}\). For more check: http://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2011/03 ... averages/and http://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2011/04 ... gebrutes/
_________________



Intern
Joined: 24 Oct 2014
Posts: 5

Re: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Feb 2015, 07:59
hi,
I perfectly understand the mathematical reasoning behind the solution why stmt 1 is not valid BUT:
we have a ratio given for x and y. My question is why I cannot say that A is valid because under the condition that X=3/4Y there is only one division of the 60,000 that with the given ratio between x and y would yield 4,080 dollars??



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59182

Re: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Feb 2015, 08:08
Oli1324 wrote: hi,
I perfectly understand the mathematical reasoning behind the solution why stmt 1 is not valid BUT:
we have a ratio given for x and y. My question is why I cannot say that A is valid because under the condition that X=3/4Y there is only one division of the 60,000 that with the given ratio between x and y would yield 4,080 dollars?? What makes you think that there will be only one unique solution? For different value of x, there will be different ways of divisions.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 05 Mar 2015
Posts: 27
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, General Management

Re: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Jan 2016, 10:43
Bunuel wrote: RadhaKrishnan wrote: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this amount earned simple annual interest at the rate of x percent per year, and the rest earned simple annual interest at the rate of y percent per year. If the total interest earned by the $60,000 for that year was $4,080, what is the value of x?
(1) x = 3y/4 (2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2. Let the amount invested at x% be \(a\), then the amount invested at y% would be \(60,000a\). Given: \(a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000a)\frac{y}{100}=4,080\) (we have 3 unknowns \(x\), \(y\), and \(a\)). Question: \(x=?\) (1) \(x=\frac{3}{4}y\) > \(y=\frac{4x}{3}\) > \(a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000a)\frac{4x}{3*100}=4,080\) > still 2 unknowns  \(x\) and \(a\). Not sufficient. (2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2 > \(\frac{a}{60,000a}=\frac{3}{2}\) > \(a=36,000\) > \(36,000*\frac{x}{100}+(60,00036,000)\frac{y}{100}=4,080\) > still 2 unknowns  \(x\) and \(y\). Not sufficient. (1)+(2) From (1) \(a\frac{x}{100}+(60,000a)\frac{4x}{3*100}=4,080\) and from (2) \(a=36,000\) > only 1 unknown  \(x\), hence we can solve for it. Sufficient. Answer: C. Hello Bunuel, Could you please explain if by asking to find X, we are asked to find the amount of money that was invested at x% or actual rate, denoted in this problem as X? I went ahead ad solved the last equation 4,080=36,000*(x/100)+(60,00036,000)*(4/3*x/100) and x=8,877......does it mean rate was 88.77%? It just cannot be right.
_________________
"You have to learn the rules of the game. And then you have to play better than anyone else". Albert Einstein



Intern
Joined: 01 Apr 2016
Posts: 11

Re: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Jun 2016, 09:50
Let first call T the part of amount invested with interest of x perct
4080 = (1+ x/100)*T + (1+ y/100)*(60000T) So we have 3 unknown ; T, x and y and 1 equation
(1) x = 3y/4
So we have 3 unknow 2 Independent equations INSUFF
(2) The ratio of the amount that earned interest at the rate of x percent per year to the amount that earned interest at the rate of y percent per year was 3 to 2. It means [(1+ x/100)*T ]/[ (1+ y/100)*(60000T) ]= 3/2 So we have 3 unknow 2 Independent equations INSUFF
(1+2) 3eq and 3 unknows SUFF !




Re: A total of $60,000 was invested for one year. Part of this
[#permalink]
01 Jun 2016, 09:50



Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 33 posts ]



