Hi, I think I might know where I got wrong for choosing Statement (1) alone is sufficient but I can't fully explain my logical fallacy in my weighted average technique. Could you please help? Thank you
- Under my thinking about weighted average concept, we have the ratio of x/y (3/4) then we can have the ratio for the amount invested (4/3), from which we can determine the exact amount of each part invested from the total 60k: $60,000x4/7 for x% & $60,000x3/7 for y%
- Now, we can determine the variable x% under the weighted average (WA) of total interests earned $4,080
I've also tried to calculate the exact x% from the above "flip ratio" assumption of the WA. I got exactly 5.95%. Thank you for help.
KarishmaB
gauravk
VeritasPrepKarishma - I was trying to use weighted average with statement 1, can you pls help.
We are given that x/y = 3/4 and we can calculate the overall rate by using the 60,000 and the interest earned 4,080. using this won't we be able to get the ratio in which 60,000 would be invested at X and Y%?
Won't we enough data with equation 1 itself to solve it for X%?
TIA
Using weighted averages,
4080/60,000 = 6.8%
Using stmnt 1:
w1/w2 = (4x/3 - 6.8)/(6.8 - x)
Now here is the problem: We don't know w1/w2 using stmnt 1 alone. So we cannot calculate the value of x.
Using stmnt 2, we get the value of w1/w2 which is 3/2. But here we don't have the ratio of x and y.
So you need both statements to get
3/2 = (4x/3 - 6.8)/(6.8 - x)
And now you can get a unique value of x.
Answer (C)